Dziewit Piotr, Rajkowski Kamil, Płatek Paweł
Faculty of Mechatronics, Armament and Aerospace, Military University of Technology, 2 Gen. S. Kaliskiego Street, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland.
Materials (Basel). 2024 Dec 12;17(24):6076. doi: 10.3390/ma17246076.
Advances in the development of additive manufacturing materials (AM) and the low availability of studies on the impact response of AM specimens are the main reasons for this paper. Therefore, the influence of building orientation (vertical and horizontal) and the angle of the raster (15°/-75°, 30°/-60°, 45°/-45°, and 0°/90°) on the tensile and impact strength of AM specimens was investigated. The polylactic acid (PLA)-PolyMax, Mediflex and acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) filaments were chosen to provide a comprehensive characterization of AM materials with versatile mechanical properties. The experimental results of this study show that the tensile strength and toughness of PolyMax PLA specimens are comparable to ABS specimens, while Mediflex samples are characterized by their higher toughness, but lower impact force needed to break the samples. The Mediflex Charpy fracture surfaces exhibit a ductile character compared to those of brittle ABS and PLA. Furthermore, fracture surface morphology shows the allocation of voids, which helps us to understand differences in mechanical properties, and allows one to properly interpret the results of the geometrical accuracy of AM specimens with various printing settings.
增材制造材料(AM)发展的进步以及关于AM试样冲击响应研究的低可用性是撰写本文的主要原因。因此,研究了构建方向(垂直和水平)以及光栅角度(15°/-75°、30°/-60°、45°/-45°和0°/90°)对AM试样拉伸强度和冲击强度的影响。选择了聚乳酸(PLA)-PolyMax、Mediflex和丙烯腈-丁二烯-苯乙烯(ABS)长丝,以全面表征具有多种机械性能的AM材料。本研究的实验结果表明,PolyMax PLA试样的拉伸强度和韧性与ABS试样相当,而Mediflex样品的特点是韧性较高,但使样品断裂所需的冲击力较低。与脆性ABS和PLA相比,Mediflex夏比断裂表面呈现出韧性特征。此外,断口表面形态显示了孔隙的分布,这有助于我们理解机械性能的差异,并能够正确解释不同打印设置下AM试样几何精度的结果。