Moreira Maria Fernanda Souza, de Azevedo Brenda Eduarda Fabris, Beretta Mileni Vanti, Busnello Fernanda Michielin
Graduate Program in Nutritional Sciences, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre (UFCSPA),Porto Alegre 90050-170, RS, Brazil.
Undergraduate Program in Nutrition, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre 90050-170, RS, Brazil.
Nutrients. 2024 Dec 20;16(24):4388. doi: 10.3390/nu16244388.
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a counseling approach based on Mindful Eating on the eating behavior of individuals living with overweight and obesity.
A 16-week randomized clinical trial was conducted to compare an online group intervention (IG) with individual online nutritional counseling (TAU). Volunteers ( = 61), aged 18 or older with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m, were randomly assigned to the two groups and invited to participate in eight biweekly sessions. Eating behavior was assessed using the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ-21), and anthropometric measures were collected through self-report. Comparison between the groups was performed using generalized linear models and Poisson models with robust variance estimators. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the group-by-time interaction. The study was approved by the UFCSPA Ethics Committee.
At baseline, the eating behavior domain with the highest mean score was emotional eating (EE) in both groups. At the end of the study, all domains decreased, while an increase in cognitive restraint (CR) was observed in the TAU group, showing a difference between the groups (-23.1; 95%CI -37.7 to -8.5; = 0.004). A group-by-time interaction difference was noted only in the CR domain, explained by the change in the TAU group for the CR comparison before and after treatment and by the difference between the IG and TAU groups at the end of the treatment period.
A Mindful Eating approach may aid in managing dysfunctional cognitive restraint, a key component for sustainable excess weight treatment. The protocol can be found on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05845411).
本研究旨在评估基于正念饮食的咨询方法对超重和肥胖个体饮食行为的影响。
进行了一项为期16周的随机临床试验,以比较在线团体干预(IG)与个体在线营养咨询(常规治疗)。志愿者(n = 61)年龄在18岁及以上,BMI≥25 kg/m²,被随机分配到两组,并被邀请参加八次每两周一次的课程。使用三因素饮食问卷(TFEQ - 21)评估饮食行为,并通过自我报告收集人体测量指标。使用广义线性模型和具有稳健方差估计器的泊松模型对两组进行比较。进行敏感性分析以评估组×时间交互作用。该研究已获得UFCSPA伦理委员会的批准。
在基线时,两组中平均得分最高的饮食行为领域是情绪化饮食(EE)。在研究结束时,所有领域均有所下降,而在常规治疗组中观察到认知克制(CR)增加,两组之间存在差异(-23.1;95%CI -37.7至-8.5;P = 0.004)。仅在CR领域注意到组×时间交互作用差异,这可以通过常规治疗组治疗前后CR比较的变化以及治疗期结束时IG组和常规治疗组之间的差异来解释。
正念饮食方法可能有助于管理功能失调的认知克制,这是可持续超重治疗的关键组成部分。该方案可在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT05845411)上找到。