Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware J E
Ann Intern Med. 1985 Apr;102(4):520-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-102-4-520.
An intervention was developed to increase patient involvement in care. Using a treatment algorithm as a guide, patients were helped to read their medical record and coached to ask questions and negotiate medical decisions with their physicians during a 20-minute session before their regularly scheduled visit. In a randomized controlled trial we compared this intervention with a standard educational session of equal length in a clinic for patients with ulcer disease. Six to eight weeks after the trial, patients in the experimental group reported fewer limitations in physical and role-related activities (p less than 0.05), preferred a more active role in medical decision-making, and were as satisfied with their care as the control group. Analysis of audiotapes of physician-patient interactions showed that patients in the experimental group were twice as effective as control patients in obtaining information from physicians (p less than 0.05). Results of the intervention included increased involvement in the interaction with the physician, fewer limitations imposed by the disease on patients' functional ability, and increased preference for active involvement in medical decision-making.
开发了一种干预措施以提高患者对医疗护理的参与度。以治疗算法为指导,在患者定期就诊前的20分钟时段内,帮助他们阅读自己的病历,并指导他们提问以及与医生协商医疗决策。在一项随机对照试验中,我们将这种干预措施与溃疡病诊所中时长相同的标准教育课程进行了比较。试验六至八周后,实验组的患者在身体和与角色相关的活动方面报告的限制较少(p小于0.05),更倾向于在医疗决策中发挥更积极的作用,并且对医疗护理的满意度与对照组相同。对医患互动录音带的分析表明,实验组的患者从医生那里获取信息的效率是对照组患者的两倍(p小于0.05)。干预措施的结果包括患者在与医生互动中的参与度提高、疾病对患者功能能力造成的限制减少,以及患者对积极参与医疗决策的偏好增加。