Gökmen Şule, Topsakal Kübra Gülnur, Duran Gökhan Serhat, Görgülü Serkan
Department of Orthodontics, Gulhane Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Orthodontics, Gulhane Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2025 Apr;167(4):454-463. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.11.006. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
This study aimed to evaluate the stability of palatal rugae patterns after slow maxillary expansion (SME) treatment and the reliability of the rugae region as a reference region in digital superimposition.
The SME group comprised 21 subjects with Angle Class I or Class II dental malocclusion with unilateral or bilateral crossbite and constricted maxilla and were selected before the pubertal peak. Intraoral scans were captured via the intraoral scanner iTero Element software (version 1.13; Align Technology, San Jose, Calif) before treatment and after completion of 12 rotations of the screw in the expansion appliance. Patients rotated the screw once a week by the established protocol. The digital data of the impressions were analyzed using GOM Inspect 3D analysis software (version 2018; GOM GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany). Dimensional changes in rugae after SME were measured with MeshLab software (version 2022.02, the Visual Computing Lab of CNR-ISTI, Italy). For the statistical analysis, the Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess normality, whereas the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were applied for group comparisons.
According to digital superimposition data, the root mean square value of the rugae region in the SME group was found to be 0.195 ± 0.086 mm. The greatest dimensional change was found in the third rugae (1.70 ± 0.42 mm, P <0.001). Post-hoc pairwise comparisons revealed a statistically significant difference between the dimensional changes of the first and third rugae (P <0.05). No statistically significant difference was found as a result of pairwise comparisons of the right and left rugae points (P = 0.083 and P = 0.200, respectively).
The observed transverse dimensional changes in the rugae, particularly in the third rugae, indicate that caution should be exercised in using the rugae region as a reference in superpositions after SME treatment.
本研究旨在评估慢速上颌扩弓(SME)治疗后腭皱襞形态的稳定性,以及在数字叠加中腭皱襞区域作为参考区域的可靠性。
SME组包括21名安氏Ⅰ类或Ⅱ类牙颌面畸形患者,伴有单侧或双侧反牙合以及上颌狭窄,均在青春期高峰前入选。治疗前及扩弓矫治器的螺丝完成12次旋转后,使用iTero Element口腔扫描仪软件(版本1.13;Align Technology,加利福尼亚州圣何塞)采集口腔内扫描图像。患者按照既定方案每周旋转一次螺丝。使用GOM Inspect 3D分析软件(版本2018;GOM GmbH,德国不伦瑞克)分析印模的数字数据。使用MeshLab软件(版本2022.02,意大利国家研究委员会信息科学与技术研究所视觉计算实验室)测量SME后腭皱襞的尺寸变化。统计分析时,采用Shapiro-Wilk检验评估正态性,而Kruskal-Wallis检验和Mann-Whitney U检验用于组间比较。
根据数字叠加数据,SME组腭皱襞区域的均方根值为0.195±0.086mm。最大尺寸变化出现在第三腭皱襞(1.70±0.42mm,P<0.001)。事后成对比较显示第一和第三腭皱襞的尺寸变化之间存在统计学显著差异(P<0.05)。左右腭皱襞点的成对比较未发现统计学显著差异(分别为P=0.083和P=0.200)。
观察到的腭皱襞横向尺寸变化,特别是第三腭皱襞的变化,表明在SME治疗后使用腭皱襞区域作为叠加参考时应谨慎。