Obel Lasse M, Diederichsen Axel C P, Kristensen Joachim S S, Gerke Oke, Larsen Katrine L, Liisberg Mads, Krasniqi Lytfi, Steffensen Flemming H, Frost Lars, Lambrechtsen Jess, Busk Martin, Urbonaviciene Grazina, Egstrup Kenneth, Karon Marek, Rasmussen Lars M, Lindholt Jes S
Elite Centre for Individualized Medicine in Arterial Disease, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Elite Centre for Individualized Medicine in Arterial Disease, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025 Mar 4;85(8):818-831. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.10.096. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
Prospective data on the clinical course of the ascending thoracic aorta are lacking.
This study sought to estimate growth rates of the ascending aorta and to evaluate occurrences of adverse aortic events (AAEs)-that is, thoracic aortic ruptures, type A aortic dissections, and thoracic aortic-related deaths.
In this prospective cohort study from the population-based, multicenter, randomized DANCAVAS (Danish Cardiovascular Screening trials) I and II, participants underwent cardiovascular risk assessments including electrocardiogram-gated, noncontrast computed tomography (CT) scans. The clinical database was supplemented with outcome data from Danish health care registries. Exclusion criteria were connective tissue disorders, bicuspid aortic valves, and survivors of a prior AAE. To estimate growth rates, participants with consecutive CT scans were followed from inclusion to last scan. To evaluate AAEs, the entire cohort was followed from inclusion to AAE; elective ascending aortic surgery; death; or December 31, 2021.
In 2,026 individuals (77.3% men; mean age: 69.2 ± 3.1 years; median follow-up: 4.5 years [Q1-Q3: 3.4-4.7 years]), 4,897 CT scans were obtained, encompassing 1,374 individuals with baseline ascending aortas of <40.0 mm (68.3% men), 388 with baseline ascending aortas between 40.0 and 44.9 mm (94.5% men), 188 with baseline ascending aortas between 45.0 and 49.9 mm (98.4% men), and 76 men with baseline ascending aortas of ≥50 mm. The mean ascending aortic growth rates in men and women were 0.07 ± 0.5 mm/year and 0.13 ± 0.3 mm/year (P = 0.012), respectively. Growth rates did not increase with larger diameters, and no differences were observed between small (<39.9 mm; 0.11 ± 0.5 mm/year) and large (≥50 mm; 0.07 ± 0.6 mm/year) (P = 0.60) aortas. In men with dilated aortas between 45.0 and 49.9 mm, 3.2% progressed to ≥50.0 mm over 4.6 years (Q1-Q3: 4.0-5.6 years). Among all 14,962 nonsyndromic participants (95.0% men; mean age: 67.7 ± 3.7 years; median follow-up: 5.0 years [Q1-Q3: 4.1-5.8 years]), 23 (0.2%) encountered AAEs (31/100,000 person-years), and 26 (0.2%) underwent elective ascending aortic surgery. In size groups of <40.0, 40.0 to 44.9, 45.0 to 49.9, and ≥50.0 mm, proportions of AAEs were 10 of 11,382 (0.1%), 5 of 2,997 (0.2%), 7 of 493 (1.4%), and <3 of 90, respectively. Adjusted HRs for AAE were 1.24 (95% CI: 1.16-1.33; P < 0.001) for each 1-mm increase in diameter and 5.43 (95% CI: 1.99-14.82; P = 0.001) for a family history of aortic aneurysms.
In men aged 60 to 74 years, growth of the ascending aorta was slow, questioning the currently recommended (bi)annual surveillance scan intervals. Additionally, 95% of AAE case patients presented with diameters of <50.0 mm upon the event, highlighting the need for individualized risk stratifications in addition to diameter. Larger prospective studies in aneurysmal women are warranted.
缺乏关于升主动脉临床病程的前瞻性数据。
本研究旨在估计升主动脉的生长速率,并评估不良主动脉事件(AAE)的发生情况,即胸主动脉破裂、A型主动脉夹层和胸主动脉相关死亡。
在这项基于人群的多中心随机DANCAVAS(丹麦心血管筛查试验)I和II前瞻性队列研究中,参与者接受了包括心电图门控非增强计算机断层扫描(CT)在内的心血管风险评估。临床数据库补充了丹麦医疗保健登记处的结局数据。排除标准为结缔组织疾病、二叶式主动脉瓣和既往AAE幸存者。为了估计生长速率,对连续进行CT扫描的参与者从纳入研究至最后一次扫描进行随访。为了评估AAE,对整个队列从纳入研究至发生AAE、择期升主动脉手术、死亡或2021年12月31日进行随访。
在2026名个体中(77.3%为男性;平均年龄:69.2±3.1岁;中位随访时间:4.5年[第一四分位数-第三四分位数:3.4-4.7年]),共获得4897次CT扫描,其中1374名个体的基线升主动脉直径<40.0mm(68.3%为男性),388名个体的基线升主动脉直径在40.0至44.9mm之间(94.5%为男性),188名个体的基线升主动脉直径在45.0至49.9mm之间(98.4%为男性),76名男性的基线升主动脉直径≥50mm。男性和女性的升主动脉平均生长速率分别为0.07±0.5mm/年和0.13±0.3mm/年(P=0.012)。生长速率并不随直径增大而增加,小主动脉(<39.9mm;0.11±0.5mm/年)和大主动脉(≥50mm;0.07±0.6mm/年)之间未观察到差异(P=0.60)。在升主动脉直径在45.0至49.9mm之间的男性中,3.2%在4.6年(第一四分位数-第三四分位数:4.0-5.6年)内进展至≥50.0mm。在所有14962名非综合征参与者中(95.0%为男性;平均年龄:67.7±3.7岁;中位随访时间:5.0年[第一四分位数-第三四分位数:4.1-5.8年]),23例(0.2%)发生AAE(31/100,000人年),26例(0.2%)接受了择期升主动脉手术。在直径<40.0mm、40.0至44.9mm、45.0至49.9mm和≥50.0mm的分组中,AAE的比例分别为11382例中的10例(0.1%)、2997例中的5例(0.2%)、493例中的7例(1.4%)和90例中的<3例。直径每增加1mm,AAE的校正风险比为1.24(95%置信区间:1.16-1.33;P<0.001),有主动脉瘤家族史者为5.43(95%置信区间:1.99-14.82;P=0.001)。
在60至74岁男性中,升主动脉生长缓慢,对目前推荐的(每)半年监测扫描间隔提出质疑。此外,95%的AAE病例患者在事件发生时主动脉直径<50.0mm,这突出表明除直径外还需要进行个体化风险分层。有必要对患动脉瘤的女性进行更大规模的前瞻性研究。