Botwright Siobhan, Sittimart Manit, Chavarina Kinanti Khansa, Bayani Diana Beatriz, Merlin Tracy, Surgey Gavin, Suharlim Christian, Espinoza Manuel A, Culyer Anthony J, Oortwijn Wija, Teerawattananon Yot
Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand; University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Value Health. 2024 Oct 22. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.09.001.
Health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines are intended to support successful implementation of HTA by enhancing consistency and transparency in concepts, methods, process, and use, thereby enhancing the legitimacy of the decision-making process. This report lays out good practices and practical recommendations for developing or updating HTA guidelines to ensure successful implementation.
The task force was established in 2022 and comprised experts and academics from various geographical regions, each with substantial experience in developing HTA guidelines for national health policymaking. Literature reviews and key-informant interviews were conducted to inform these good practices. Stakeholder consultations, open peer reviews, and expert opinions validated the recommendations. A series of teleconferences among task force members was held to iteratively refine the report.
The recommendations cover 6 key aspects throughout the guideline development cycle: (1) setting objectives, scope, and principles of the guideline, (2) building a team for a quality guideline, (3) defining a stakeholder engagement plan, (iv) developing content and utilizing available resources, (v) putting in place appropriate institutional arrangements, and (vi) monitoring and evaluating guideline success.
This report presents a set of resources and context-appropriate practices for developing or updating HTA guidelines. Across all contexts, the recommendations emphasize transparency, building trust among stakeholders, and fostering a culture of ongoing learning and improvement. The report recommends timing development and revision of guidelines according to the HTA landscape and pace of HTA institutionalization. Because HTA is increasingly used to inform different kinds of decision making in a variety of country contexts, it will be important to continue to monitor lessons learned to ensure the recommendations remain relevant and effective.
卫生技术评估(HTA)指南旨在通过提高概念、方法、流程及应用方面的一致性和透明度来支持HTA的成功实施,从而增强决策过程的合法性。本报告阐述了制定或更新HTA指南以确保成功实施的良好做法和实用建议。
该特别工作组于2022年成立,成员包括来自不同地理区域的专家和学者,他们在为国家卫生政策制定制定HTA指南方面均有丰富经验。通过文献综述和关键信息访谈来了解这些良好做法。利益相关者咨询、公开同行评审和专家意见对这些建议进行了验证。特别工作组成员举行了一系列电话会议,对报告进行反复完善。
这些建议涵盖了指南制定周期的6个关键方面:(1)确定指南的目标、范围和原则;(2)组建一个高质量指南的团队;(3)制定利益相关者参与计划;(4)制定内容并利用现有资源;(5)建立适当的制度安排;(6)监测和评估指南的成功情况。
本报告提供了一套用于制定或更新HTA指南的资源和适合具体情况的做法。在所有情况下,这些建议都强调透明度、在利益相关者之间建立信任以及培养持续学习和改进的文化。报告建议根据HTA的形势和HTA制度化的步伐来安排指南的制定和修订时间。由于HTA越来越多地被用于为各种国家背景下的不同类型决策提供信息,持续监测经验教训以确保这些建议仍然相关且有效将很重要。