Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University of Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Value Health. 2019 Jan;22(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
The systematic use of evidence to inform healthcare decisions, particularly health technology assessment (HTA), has gained increased recognition. HTA has become a standard policy tool for informing decision makers who must manage the entry and use of pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and other technologies (including complex interventions) within health systems, for example, through reimbursement and pricing. Despite increasing attention to HTA activities, there has been no attempt to comprehensively synthesize good practices or emerging good practices to support population-based decision-making in recent years. After the identification of some good practices through the release of the ISPOR Guidelines Index in 2013, the ISPOR HTA Council identified a need to more thoroughly review existing guidance. The purpose of this effort was to create a basis for capacity building, education, and improved consistency in approaches to HTA-informed decision-making. Our findings suggest that although many good practices have been developed in areas of assessment and some other key aspects of defining HTA processes, there are also many areas where good practices are lacking. This includes good practices in defining the organizational aspects of HTA, the use of deliberative processes, and measuring the impact of HTA. The extent to which these good practices are used and applied by HTA bodies is beyond the scope of this report, but may be of interest to future researchers.
系统地使用证据来为医疗保健决策提供信息,特别是健康技术评估(HTA),已经得到了越来越多的认可。HTA 已成为为决策者提供信息的标准政策工具,决策者必须管理药品、医疗器械和其他技术(包括复杂干预措施)在卫生系统中的准入和使用,例如通过报销和定价。尽管近年来越来越关注 HTA 活动,但尚未有人试图全面综合良好做法或新兴良好做法,以支持基于人群的决策。在 2013 年发布 ISPOR 指南索引确定了一些良好做法之后,ISPOR HTA 理事会确定需要更彻底地审查现有的指南。这项工作的目的是为能力建设、教育和改进 HTA 知情决策方法的一致性奠定基础。我们的研究结果表明,尽管在评估领域和 HTA 流程的其他一些关键方面已经制定了许多良好做法,但在其他许多方面也缺乏良好做法。这包括在定义 HTA 的组织方面、使用审议程序以及衡量 HTA 的影响方面的良好做法。HTA 机构在多大程度上使用和应用这些良好做法超出了本报告的范围,但可能是未来研究人员感兴趣的问题。