• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小儿和青少年患者关节镜下Bankart修复术后复发性不稳定的危险因素:一项系统评价

Risk Factors for Recurrent Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Warner Tyler, Kay Jeffrey, McInnis Shane, Heyworth Benton E

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2025 May;53(6):1494-1504. doi: 10.1177/03635465241267022. Epub 2025 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1177/03635465241267022
PMID:39772713
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While risk factors for recurrent instability (RI) after arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) for anterior glenohumeral instability (aGHI) have been well established in adult populations, there is much less evidence in pediatric and adolescent patients, despite being the most affected epidemiologic subpopulation.

PURPOSE

To identify the clinical, demographic, radiologic, and operative risk factors for RI after ABR for aGHI in pediatric and adolescent patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

This systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). Three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Ovid [MEDLINE]) were searched from data inception to July 5, 2023, using the terms "pediatric,""shoulder instability," and "Bankart repair," allowing data on patients with age up to 19 years. The Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies tool was used to assess the quality of included studies.

RESULTS

Eleven studies met the criteria, with 767 patients (770 shoulders) with a mean age of 16.4 years (range, 12-19; 18% female). The pooled RI rate was 28%, and the revision aGHI surgery rate was 20%. The following risk factors were identified for RI after ABR, in descending order of frequency of identification, in terms of number of studies: younger age and greater glenoid bone loss, as well as the presence and/or greater size of a Hill-Sachs lesion (HSL) (2 studies each), followed by off-track HSL, >1 dislocation before index surgery, overhead and/or contact sports participation, larger anterior labral tear size, loss of glenoid retroversion, greater number of anchors used, lower postoperative patient-reported outcome scores (PROs), nonunion after bony Bankart repair, and absence of concomitant remplissage (1 study each).

CONCLUSION

In pediatric and adolescent patients with aGHI, the most common risk factors identified for RI after ABR were younger age, greater glenoid bone loss, and the presence and greater size of an HSL. Other risk factors included >1 dislocation before index surgery, participation in overhead and/or contact sports, larger anterior labral tear size, loss of glenoid retroversion, greater number of anchors used, lower postoperative PROs, nonunion after bony Bankart repair, and absence of concomitant remplissage.

摘要

背景

虽然成人前盂肱关节不稳(aGHI)行关节镜下Bankart修复术(ABR)后复发性不稳(RI)的危险因素已得到充分证实,但在儿童和青少年患者中证据要少得多,尽管他们是受影响最严重的流行病学亚人群。

目的

确定儿童和青少年患者aGHI行ABR术后RI的临床、人口统计学、影像学和手术危险因素。

研究设计

系统评价;证据等级,4级。

方法

本系统评价按照PRISMA指南(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)进行。从数据起始至2023年7月5日,在三个数据库(PubMed、Embase和Ovid [MEDLINE])中进行检索,使用“儿科”“肩部不稳”和“Bankart修复”等检索词,纳入年龄最大为19岁患者的数据。采用非随机研究方法学指标工具评估纳入研究的质量。

结果

11项研究符合标准,共767例患者(770个肩部),平均年龄16.4岁(范围12 - 19岁;18%为女性)。汇总的RI发生率为28%,翻修aGHI手术率为20%。确定了ABR术后RI的以下危险因素,按研究中出现频率从高到低排序:年龄较小、肩胛盂骨丢失较多、存在Hill - Sachs损伤(HSL)及HSL较大(各2项研究),其次是偏离轨道的HSL、初次手术前脱位>1次、从事过头和/或接触性运动、前盂唇撕裂较大、肩胛盂后倾丧失、使用的锚钉数量较多、术后患者报告结局评分(PRO)较低、骨性Bankart修复术后不愈合以及未同时进行 remplissage(各1项研究)。

结论

在患有aGHI的儿童和青少年患者中,ABR术后RI最常见的危险因素是年龄较小、肩胛盂骨丢失较多、存在HSL及HSL较大。其他危险因素包括初次手术前脱位>1次、从事过头和/或接触性运动、前盂唇撕裂较大、肩胛盂后倾丧失、使用的锚钉数量较多、术后PRO较低、骨性Bankart修复术后不愈合以及未同时进行 remplissage。

相似文献

1
Risk Factors for Recurrent Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients: A Systematic Review.小儿和青少年患者关节镜下Bankart修复术后复发性不稳定的危险因素:一项系统评价
Am J Sports Med. 2025 May;53(6):1494-1504. doi: 10.1177/03635465241267022. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
2
The Addition of Remplissage to Arthroscopic Bankart Repair and Effect on Recurrent Instability in Shoulders With Critical Humeral Bone Loss.在关节镜下Bankart修复术中增加充填术及其对伴有严重肱骨骨质缺损的肩关节复发性不稳定的影响。
Am J Sports Med. 2025 Jul;53(8):1799-1805. doi: 10.1177/03635465251340082. Epub 2025 May 26.
3
Higher return to sport and lower revision rates when performing arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage for anterior shoulder instability with a Hill-Sachs lesion: a meta-analysis.Bankart 修补术联合 remplissage 治疗合并 Hill-Sachs 损伤的复发性肩关节前脱位:一项 Meta 分析
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Aug;33(8):1836-1846. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.01.045. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
4
Age, participation in competitive sports, bony lesions, ALPSA lesions, > 1 preoperative dislocations, surgical delay and ISIS score > 3 are risk factors for recurrence following arthroscopic Bankart repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 4584 shoulders.年龄、参与竞技体育、骨损伤、ALPSA 损伤、术前脱位次数>1、手术延迟和 ISIS 评分>3 是关节镜下 Bankart 修复术后复发的危险因素:4584 例肩关节的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Dec;29(12):4004-4014. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06704-7. Epub 2021 Aug 22.
5
The Pittsburgh Instability Tool Score Predicts Outcomes After Arthroscopic Anterior Shoulder Stabilization in Patients With Subcritical Bone Loss.匹兹堡不稳定工具评分可预测亚临界骨量丢失患者关节镜下前肩稳定术后的结局。
Arthroscopy. 2025 May 23. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.04.023.
6
Clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic bony Bankart repair using the 'door-locking' technique: excellent bone healing with a low complication rate.采用“门锁”技术进行关节镜下骨性Bankart修复的临床和影像学结果:骨愈合良好,并发症发生率低。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025 Jan 3. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.011.
7
Outcomes of the Latarjet Procedure Compared With Bankart Repair for Recurrent Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability.Latarjet 手术与 Bankart 修复治疗复发性创伤性肩关节前不稳定的疗效比较。
J Athl Train. 2018 Feb;53(2):181-183. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-232-16. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
8
Long-term Outcomes of a Contemporary Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Technique in Patients With Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-up.当代关节镜下Bankart修复技术治疗创伤性前肩不稳患者的长期疗效:至少10年随访
Am J Sports Med. 2025 Aug;53(10):2298-2305. doi: 10.1177/03635465251351293. Epub 2025 Jul 7.
9
No Difference in Outcomes After Remplissage or Open Bankart Repair Plus Inferior Capsular Shift in Collision and Contact Athletes With Subcritical Glenoid Bone Loss ≤10% and Off-Track Hill-Sachs Lesion.对于临界以下肩胛盂骨丢失≤10%且存在脱轨Hill-Sachs损伤的碰撞和接触性运动员,在进行 remplissage 或开放性Bankart修复加下关节囊移位术后,结果无差异。
Arthroscopy. 2025 Jul;41(7):2271-2279. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.11.097. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
10
Editorial Commentary: Open Bankart Procedure for Anterior Shoulder Instability Is Recommended for Contact Athletes With Bony Bankart Fractures or Approximately 10% Glenoid Bone Loss.编者按:对于有骨性Bankart骨折或约10%关节盂骨丢失的接触性运动员,推荐采用开放性Bankart手术治疗前肩不稳。
Arthroscopy. 2025 Jul;41(7):2280-2282. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.02.001. Epub 2025 Feb 11.