• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估ChatGPT在哮喘常识方面的准确性和可靠性:对人工智能在公共卫生教育中的应用的启示。

Assessing ChatGPT's accuracy and reliability in asthma general knowledge: implications for artificial intelligence use in public health education.

作者信息

Ghozali Muhammad Thesa

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Management, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.

出版信息

J Asthma. 2025 Jun;62(6):975-983. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2025.2450482. Epub 2025 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1080/02770903.2025.2450482
PMID:39773167
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) into public health education represents a pivotal advancement in medical knowledge dissemination, particularly for chronic diseases such as asthma. This study assesses the accuracy and comprehensiveness of ChatGPT, a conversational AI model, in providing asthma-related information.

METHODS

Employing a rigorous mixed-methods approach, healthcare professionals evaluated ChatGPT's responses to the Asthma General Knowledge Questionnaire for Adults (AGKQA), a standardized instrument covering various asthma-related topics. Responses were graded for accuracy and completeness and analyzed using statistical tests to assess reproducibility and consistency.

RESULTS

ChatGPT showed notable proficiency in conveying asthma knowledge, with flawless success in the etiology and pathophysiology categories and substantial accuracy in medication information (70%). However, limitations were noted in medication-related responses, where mixed accuracy (30%) highlights the need for further refinement of ChatGPT's capabilities to ensure reliability in critical areas of asthma education. Reproducibility analysis demonstrated a consistent 100% rate across all categories, affirming ChatGPT's reliability in delivering uniform information. Statistical analyses further underscored ChatGPT's stability and reliability.

CONCLUSION

These findings underscore ChatGPT's promise as a valuable educational tool for asthma while emphasizing the necessity of ongoing improvements to address observed limitations, particularly regarding medication-related information.

摘要

背景

将人工智能(AI)整合到公共卫生教育中是医学知识传播的一项关键进展,尤其是对于哮喘等慢性疾病而言。本研究评估了对话式人工智能模型ChatGPT在提供哮喘相关信息方面的准确性和全面性。

方法

采用严格的混合方法,医疗保健专业人员评估了ChatGPT对《成人哮喘常识问卷》(AGKQA)的回答,AGKQA是一种涵盖各种哮喘相关主题的标准化工具。对回答的准确性和完整性进行评分,并使用统计测试进行分析,以评估可重复性和一致性。

结果

ChatGPT在传达哮喘知识方面表现出显著的熟练程度,在病因和病理生理学类别中取得了完美的成功,在药物信息方面具有较高的准确性(70%)。然而,在与药物相关的回答中发现了局限性,其中混合准确性(30%)突出表明需要进一步完善ChatGPT的能力,以确保在哮喘教育的关键领域具有可靠性。可重复性分析表明所有类别中的一致率为100%,肯定了ChatGPT在提供统一信息方面的可靠性。统计分析进一步强调了ChatGPT的稳定性和可靠性。

结论

这些发现强调了ChatGPT作为哮喘有价值的教育工具的前景,同时强调了持续改进以解决观察到的局限性的必要性,特别是关于与药物相关的信息。

相似文献

1
Assessing ChatGPT's accuracy and reliability in asthma general knowledge: implications for artificial intelligence use in public health education.评估ChatGPT在哮喘常识方面的准确性和可靠性:对人工智能在公共卫生教育中的应用的启示。
J Asthma. 2025 Jun;62(6):975-983. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2025.2450482. Epub 2025 Jan 11.
2
ChatGPT's Attitude, Knowledge, and Clinical Application in Geriatrics Practice and Education: Exploratory Observational Study.ChatGPT在老年医学实践与教育中的态度、知识及临床应用:探索性观察研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 3;9:e63494. doi: 10.2196/63494.
3
Assessing the Quality and Reliability of ChatGPT's Responses to Radiotherapy-Related Patient Queries: Comparative Study With GPT-3.5 and GPT-4.评估ChatGPT对放疗相关患者问题回答的质量和可靠性:与GPT-3.5和GPT-4的比较研究
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Apr 16;11:e63677. doi: 10.2196/63677.
4
ChatGPT's performance in German OB/GYN exams - paving the way for AI-enhanced medical education and clinical practice.ChatGPT在德国妇产科考试中的表现——为人工智能强化医学教育和临床实践铺平道路。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Dec 13;10:1296615. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1296615. eCollection 2023.
5
Health profession students' perceptions of ChatGPT in healthcare and education: insights from a mixed-methods study.健康专业学生对ChatGPT在医疗保健和教育领域的看法:一项混合方法研究的见解
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 21;25(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06702-0.
6
Ability of ChatGPT to Replace Doctors in Patient Education: Cross-Sectional Comparative Analysis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.ChatGPT在患者教育中替代医生的能力:炎症性肠病的横断面比较分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 31;27:e62857. doi: 10.2196/62857.
7
Assessing the Accuracy of Generative Conversational Artificial Intelligence in Debunking Sleep Health Myths: Mixed Methods Comparative Study With Expert Analysis.评估生成式对话人工智能在破除睡眠健康误区方面的准确性:采用专家分析的混合方法比较研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Apr 16;8:e55762. doi: 10.2196/55762.
8
Navigating ChatGPT's alignment with expert consensus on pediatric OSA management.探讨 ChatGPT 在儿科阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)管理方面与专家共识的一致性。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Nov;186:112131. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112131. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
9
Artificial Intelligence in Cardiac Rehabilitation: Assessing ChatGPT's Knowledge and Clinical Scenario Responses.心脏康复中的人工智能:评估ChatGPT的知识及临床情景应答
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2025 Apr;53(3):173-177. doi: 10.5543/tkda.2025.57195.
10
Assessing question characteristic influences on ChatGPT's performance and response-explanation consistency: Insights from Taiwan's Nursing Licensing Exam.评估问题特征对 ChatGPT 表现和回应解释一致性的影响:来自台湾护理执照考试的见解。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 May;153:104717. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104717. Epub 2024 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Asthma: A Review of a New Frontier in Patient Care.人工智能在哮喘管理中的应用:患者护理新前沿综述
J Asthma Allergy. 2025 Aug 16;18:1179-1191. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S535264. eCollection 2025.