Sridharan Kannan, Sivaramakrishnan Gowri
Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain.
Bahrain Defence Force Royal Medical Services, Riffa, Kingdom of Bahrain.
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2025 Jan 7;17(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13098-024-01570-y.
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) and drugs interfering with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) are frequently co-prescribed in type 2 diabetes management. Both drug classes have been independently associated with angioedema, raising concerns about potential interaction risks. This study aimed to evaluate the safety signals and interaction patterns for angioedema associated with DPP-4is alone and in combination with RAAS-interfering drugs.
We conducted a comprehensive pharmacovigilance analysis using the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (USFDA AERS) database. Disproportionality analyses employing both frequentist (Reporting Odds Ratio, Proportional Reporting Ratio) and Bayesian approaches were performed. Drug-drug interactions were assessed using multiplicative drug-drug interaction model. Additionally, we reviewed published case reports of DPP-4i-associated angioedema.
Analysis of 29,163,222 reports identified 588 cases of DPP-4i-associated angioedema. Significant safety signals were detected for DPP-4i monotherapies, while combinations with RAAS-interfering drugs demonstrated stronger signals through both frequentist and Bayesian analyses. Significant interaction signals were observed for sitagliptin/irbesartan, sitagliptin/valsartan, linagliptin/valsartan and alogliptin/lisinopril combinations. Alogliptin/lisinopril and sitagliptin/irbesartan combinations showed the highest risk profiles. Angioedema occurred predominantly in elderly patients (> 65 years) and females. Sixteen case reports corroborated the findings from the database assessment. Clinical outcomes were comparable between monotherapy and combination therapy groups.
This pharmacovigilance analysis reveals significant safety signals for angioedema with specific DPP-4i combinations with RAAS-interfering drugs, suggesting potential drug-drug interactions. These findings emphasize the need for careful patient monitoring, particularly in vulnerable populations, when prescribing these combinations. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and establish definitive causal relationships.
二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP-4i)和干扰肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统(RAAS)的药物在2型糖尿病管理中经常联合使用。这两类药物都与血管性水肿独立相关,引发了对潜在相互作用风险的担忧。本研究旨在评估单独使用DPP-4i以及与干扰RAAS的药物联合使用时与血管性水肿相关的安全信号和相互作用模式。
我们使用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(USFDA AERS)数据库进行了全面的药物警戒分析。采用频率学派(报告比值比、比例报告比)和贝叶斯方法进行不成比例分析。使用乘法药物-药物相互作用模型评估药物-药物相互作用。此外,我们回顾了已发表的与DPP-4i相关的血管性水肿病例报告。
对29,163,222份报告的分析确定了588例与DPP-4i相关的血管性水肿病例。DPP-4i单药治疗检测到显著的安全信号,而与干扰RAAS的药物联合使用通过频率学派和贝叶斯分析均显示出更强的信号。西他列汀/厄贝沙坦、西他列汀/缬沙坦、利格列汀/缬沙坦和阿格列汀/赖诺普利组合观察到显著的相互作用信号。阿格列汀/赖诺普利和西他列汀/厄贝沙坦组合显示出最高的风险特征。血管性水肿主要发生在老年患者(>65岁)和女性中。16例病例报告证实了数据库评估的结果。单药治疗组和联合治疗组的临床结局相当。
这项药物警戒分析揭示了特定DPP-4i与干扰RAAS的药物联合使用时与血管性水肿相关的显著安全信号,提示潜在的药物-药物相互作用。这些发现强调在开具这些联合用药时,需要对患者进行仔细监测,尤其是在易感人群中。有必要进行进一步的前瞻性研究以验证这些发现并建立明确的因果关系。