Hoffmann Sebastian, Hoffmann Tabea, Potkrajcic Vlatko, Deinzer Christoph K W, Benzler Katrin, Zender Lars, Daigeler Adrien, Thiel Johannes Tobias
Department of Hand, Plastic, Reconstructive and Burn Surgery, BG Trauma Center Tuebingen, University of Tuebingen, Schnarrenbergstraße 95, Tuebingen, 72076, Germany.
Department of Marketing, Faculty of Economics and Business, University Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Jan 8;23(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03632-x.
To assess the tolerability of multimodal therapy in soft tissue sarcoma patients, particularly with regard to their quality of life and level of distress.
A retrospective cohort study enrolled individuals receiving sarcoma therapy at the sarcoma center of the University of Tuebingen between 2017 and 2022. Participants completed an online survey that included the EORTC's questionnaire (QLQ-C30), coupled with the distress thermometer and demographic inquiries. The primary emphasis was on comparing three distinct modalities: Radiation, Chemotherapy and Surgery. The data were analysed performing one-way ANOVA.
A total of 237 patients were included in the study. There was a significant difference (p < 0.001) in quality of life according to the EORTC scores (high score = high quality of life) between the different treatments: chemotherapy (mean: 26.8 [standard deviation: 19.5]), radiotherapy (51.0 [21.5]), and surgery (46.9 [28.3]). Similarly, a statistically significant discrepancy (p < 0.001) was found in average distress levels (high score = high level of distress) corresponding to each treatment type: radiation (5.0 [2.7]), surgery (6.0 [2.9]), and chemotherapy (7.4 [2.4]). The rates of patients willing to undergo the same treatment varied across groups, with the highest percentage observed in the surgery group (94.2%), followed by radiation (87.4%), and chemotherapy (73.5%).
Patients receiving multimodal therapy for soft tissue often find chemotherapy particularly demanding. Impairment of both quality of life and physical well-being is more likely and tends to be more severe compared with radiation or surgery. These observations should be taken into consideration when consenting patients and offering treatment plans.
评估多模式疗法对软组织肉瘤患者的耐受性,尤其是在生活质量和痛苦程度方面。
一项回顾性队列研究纳入了2017年至2022年间在图宾根大学肉瘤中心接受肉瘤治疗的患者。参与者完成了一项在线调查,其中包括欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)的问卷(QLQ-C30),以及痛苦温度计和人口统计学询问。主要重点是比较三种不同的治疗方式:放疗、化疗和手术。数据采用单因素方差分析进行分析。
共有237名患者纳入研究。根据EORTC评分(高分=高质量生活),不同治疗方式之间的生活质量存在显著差异(p<0.001):化疗(平均值:26.8[标准差:19.5])、放疗(51.0[21.5])和手术(46.9[28.3])。同样,在每种治疗方式对应的平均痛苦水平(高分=高痛苦程度)上发现了统计学上的显著差异(p<0.001):放疗(5.0[2.7])、手术(6.0[2.9])和化疗(7.4[2.4])。愿意接受相同治疗的患者比例在不同组之间有所不同,手术组观察到的比例最高(94.2%),其次是放疗(87.4%)和化疗(73.5%)。
接受软组织多模式治疗的患者通常发现化疗特别难以承受。与放疗或手术相比,生活质量和身体健康的损害更有可能发生,而且往往更严重。在征得患者同意并提供治疗方案时应考虑这些观察结果。