Rocha Bruna M M, McGovern Josh, Paiva Carlos E, Dolan Ross D, Paiva Bianca S R, Preto Daniel D, Laird Barry J, Maia Yara C P, McMillan Donald C
Molecular Biology and Nutrition Research Group, School of Medicine, Federal University of Uberlandia, Uberlandia38405-320, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Academic Unit of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, New Lister Building, Royal Infirmary, GlasgowG31 2ER, Scotland, UK.
Br J Nutr. 2025 Jan 28;133(2):246-252. doi: 10.1017/S0007114524003271. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
An assessment of systemic inflammation and nutritional status may form the basis of a framework to examine the prognostic value of cachexia in patients with advanced cancer. The objective of the study was to examine the prognostic value of the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria, including BMI, weight loss (WL) and systemic inflammation (as measured by the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS)), in advanced cancer patients. Three criteria were examined in a combined cohort of patients with advanced cancer, and their relationship with survival was examined using Cox regression methods. Data were available on 1303 patients. Considering BMI and the mGPS, the 3-month survival rate varied from 74 % (BMI > 28 kg/m) to 61 % (BMI < 20 kg/m) and from 84 % (mGPS 0) to 60 % (mGPS 2). Considering WL and the mGPS, the 3-month survival rate varied from 81 % (WL ± 2·4 %) to 47 % (WL ≥ 15 %) and from 93 % (mGPS 0) to 60 % (mGPS 2). Considering BMI/WL grade and mGPS, the 3-month survival rate varied from 86 % (BMI/WL grade 0) to 59 % (BMI/WL grade 4) and from 93 % (mGPS 0) to 63 % (mGPS 2). When these criteria were combined, they better predicted survival. On multivariate survival analysis, the most highly predictive factors were BMI/WL grade 3 (HR 1·454, = 0·004), BMI/WL grade 4 (HR 2·285, < 0·001) and mGPS 1 and 2 (HR 1·889, HR 2·545, all < 0·001). In summary, a high BMI/WL grade and a high mGPS as outlined in the BMI/WL grade/mGPS framework were consistently associated with poorer survival of patients with advanced cancer. It can be readily incorporated into the routine assessment of patients.
对全身炎症和营养状况的评估可能构成一个框架的基础,以检验恶病质在晚期癌症患者中的预后价值。本研究的目的是检验营养不良全球领导力倡议标准(包括体重指数(BMI)、体重减轻(WL)和全身炎症(通过改良格拉斯哥预后评分(mGPS)衡量))在晚期癌症患者中的预后价值。在晚期癌症患者的合并队列中检查了这三个标准,并使用Cox回归方法检查了它们与生存率的关系。有1303例患者的数据。考虑BMI和mGPS时,3个月生存率从74%(BMI>28kg/m)到61%(BMI<20kg/m),从84%(mGPS 0)到60%(mGPS 2)不等。考虑WL和mGPS时,3个月生存率从81%(WL±2·4%)到47%(WL≥15%),从93%(mGPS 0)到60%(mGPS 2)不等。考虑BMI/WL分级和mGPS时,3个月生存率从86%(BMI/WL分级0)到59%(BMI/WL分级4),从93%(mGPS 0)到63%(mGPS 2)不等。当这些标准结合使用时,它们能更好地预测生存率。在多变量生存分析中,预测性最强的因素是BMI/WL分级3(风险比1·454,P = 0·004)、BMI/WL分级4(风险比2·285,P<0·001)以及mGPS 1和2(风险比1·889、风险比2·545,均P<0·001)。总之,BMI/WL分级/mGPS框架中概述的高BMI/WL分级和高mGPS与晚期癌症患者较差的生存率始终相关。它可以很容易地纳入患者的常规评估中。