Suppr超能文献

基础医学教育认证标准中的公平性:一项范围综述方案

Equity in Basic Medical Education accreditation standards: a scoping review protocol.

作者信息

Shaheen Neelofar, Mahboob Usman, Sethi Ahsan, Irfan Muhammad

机构信息

Institute of Health Professions Education and Research, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan

Department of Health Professions Education and Research, Peshawar Medical College, Riphah International University, Peshawar, Pakistan.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 7;15(1):e086661. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086661.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Accreditation in Health Professions Education is a pivotal process to ensure the quality of medical institutions and health professionals. ' is an umbrella term reflecting the principles of justice and support to disadvantaged entities according to their needs. While commonly applied to various domains in medical education, there is potential to determine how ' is considered or discussed while practically implementing accreditation standards for Basic Medical Education (BME) globally.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The scoping review protocol has been drafted in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Protocol (PRISMA-P) checklist. We will conduct a planned scoping review according to the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines for scoping review and adhere to the PRISMA-Scoping Review extension (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. A systematic literature search, from inception to May 2024, will be conducted across search engines and databases including Google Scholar, PubMed, Web of Science, Wiley Online Library and ProQuest, in collaboration with a qualified librarian. Peer-reviewed research articles, commentaries, opinion papers and reviews that explicitly or implicitly discuss equity in reference to accreditation standards will be eligible for inclusion. A qualitative inductive thematic analysis will be employed to systematically identify categories and themes from the extracted data and draw conclusions.The review team anticipates the development of a conceptual map that will evolve during the synthesis of the literature, as a description of the term ' in the implementation of BME accreditation standards. We also anticipate finding any methodological or theoretical framework that is used in the literature to discuss the concept of ' in the implementation of BME accreditation standards.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This scoping review aims to systematically map the literature on the burgeoning domain of accreditation in BME. The scoping review entails the collection and synthesis of literature and does not require ethical approval as per local regulations, as it does not involve primary data collection or interaction with human participants. The research findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, social media platforms, and academic presentations at workshops and conferences.

摘要

引言

卫生专业教育认证是确保医疗机构和卫生专业人员质量的关键过程。“公平”是一个总括性术语,反映了根据弱势群体的需求给予其公正和支持的原则。虽然该术语通常应用于医学教育的各个领域,但在全球范围内实际实施基础医学教育(BME)认证标准时,有可能确定如何考虑或讨论“公平”。

方法与分析

范围综述方案已按照系统评价与Meta分析方案首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)清单起草。我们将根据乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(JBI)范围综述指南进行计划中的范围综述,并遵循PRISMA范围综述扩展版(PRISMA-ScR)清单。将与一名合格的图书馆员合作,在包括谷歌学术、PubMed、科学网、威利在线图书馆和ProQuest在内的搜索引擎和数据库中进行从创刊到2024年5月的系统文献检索。明确或隐含地讨论与认证标准相关的公平问题的同行评议研究文章、评论、意见书和综述将符合纳入条件。将采用定性归纳主题分析从提取的数据中系统地识别类别和主题并得出结论。综述团队预计将绘制一幅概念图,该图将在文献综合过程中不断演变,作为对BME认证标准实施中“公平”一词的描述。我们还预计会找到文献中用于讨论BME认证标准实施中“公平”概念的任何方法或理论框架。

伦理与传播

本范围综述旨在系统梳理BME认证这一新兴领域的文献。范围综述需要收集和综合文献,根据当地法规,由于不涉及原始数据收集或与人类参与者的互动,因此不需要伦理批准。研究结果将通过同行评议出版物、社交媒体平台以及在研讨会和会议上的学术报告进行传播。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fe9/11748772/eca3f3ba1151/bmjopen-15-1-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验