• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与关键利益相关者共同开展一项适应性儿科重症监护病房平台试验:一项定性研究。

Developing an adaptive paediatric intensive care unit platform trial with key stakeholders: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Mitchell Tracy Karen, Menzies Julie C, Ramnarayan Padmanabhan, Gould Doug William, Deja Elizabeth, Marsh Shelley, Ainsworth Jennifer, Preston Jennifer, Sedgwick Hannah, Tibbins Carly, Mouncey Paul R, Peters Mark J, Woolfall Kerry

机构信息

Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 7;15(1):e085142. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085142.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085142
PMID:39773799
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11749188/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Platform trials were used successfully in adult populations during the COVID-19 pandemic. By testing multiple treatments within a single trial, platform trials can help identify the most effective treatments (and any interactions between treatments) for patients more quickly and with less burden for patients and their families. The aim of this qualitative research was to inform the design of the first adaptive platform trial for paediatric intensive care in the UK with young people, parents/carers and paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) staff.

DESIGN

Qualitative semistructured focus group study. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

Young people, parents/carers, and PICU medical, nursing and research staff.

SETTING

The UK.

RESULTS

A total of 86 participants (18 young people; 15 parents/carers; 53 PICU staff) took part in 1 of 10 focus groups between May and September 2023. Participants viewed the proposed PICU platform trial and use of research without prior consent to be acceptable. Findings provide insight into how the PICU platform trial should be designed and operationalised, including having a broad and inclusive population eligible for inclusion onto the platform trial, with different inclusion and exclusion criteria for each domain; starting the trial with no more than three domains and prioritising the outcomes of and (all participants). Optimal governance structure and suggestions about how any challenges to the success of the full trial can be overcome are also presented.

CONCLUSIONS

Young people, parents/carers and PICU staff viewed the proposed PICU platform trial to be acceptable. These key stakeholders supported us with the design of an adaptive platform trial for PICU that has a rigorous methodology, yet can be operationalised in a family-centred way, to provide high-quality evidence that can support clinical decision-making and guide the treatment of critically ill children. Our findings have informed the PICU platform trial protocol.

摘要

目的

在新冠疫情期间,平台试验在成年人群体中得到了成功应用。通过在单一试验中测试多种治疗方法,平台试验能够更快速地为患者确定最有效的治疗方法(以及治疗之间的任何相互作用),同时减轻患者及其家庭的负担。这项定性研究的目的是为英国首个针对儿科重症监护的适应性平台试验的设计提供参考,该试验涉及年轻人、父母/照顾者以及儿科重症监护病房(PICU)工作人员。

设计

定性半结构化焦点小组研究。采用反思性主题分析法对数据进行分析。

参与者

年轻人、父母/照顾者以及PICU的医疗、护理和研究人员。

地点

英国。

结果

2023年5月至9月期间,共有86名参与者(18名年轻人;15名父母/照顾者;53名PICU工作人员)参加了10个焦点小组中的1个。参与者认为拟议的PICU平台试验以及未经事先同意使用研究方法是可以接受的。研究结果为PICU平台试验应如何设计和实施提供了见解,包括拥有广泛且包容性强的人群有资格纳入平台试验,每个领域有不同的纳入和排除标准;试验开始时不超过三个领域,并优先考虑所有参与者的结果。还提出了最佳治理结构以及关于如何克服全面试验成功面临的任何挑战的建议。

结论

年轻人、父母/照顾者和PICU工作人员认为拟议的PICU平台试验是可以接受的。这些关键利益相关者支持我们设计一个针对PICU的适应性平台试验,该试验具有严谨的方法,但可以以家庭为中心的方式实施,以提供高质量的证据来支持临床决策并指导危重症儿童的治疗。我们的研究结果为PICU平台试验方案提供了参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/026c/11749188/42d865850166/bmjopen-15-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/026c/11749188/b0fe5ad0d5ca/bmjopen-15-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/026c/11749188/42d865850166/bmjopen-15-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/026c/11749188/b0fe5ad0d5ca/bmjopen-15-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/026c/11749188/42d865850166/bmjopen-15-1-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing an adaptive paediatric intensive care unit platform trial with key stakeholders: a qualitative study.与关键利益相关者共同开展一项适应性儿科重症监护病房平台试验:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 7;15(1):e085142. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085142.
2
"We want to include him in that journey": A qualitative descriptive study of parental experiences and considerations for sibling inclusion in the paediatric ICU.“我们希望他能参与这段旅程”:一项关于儿科 ICU 中兄弟姐妹参与的父母体验和考虑的定性描述性研究。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2024 Aug;83:103696. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103696. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
3
Routine gastric residual volume measurement to guide enteral feeding in mechanically ventilated infants and children: the GASTRIC feasibility study.常规胃残余量测量指导机械通气婴儿和儿童的肠内喂养:GASTRIC 可行性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 May;24(23):1-120. doi: 10.3310/hta24230.
4
Nurses' perceptions of working with families in the paediatric intensive care unit.护士在儿科重症监护病房中与家庭合作的看法。
Nurs Crit Care. 2017 Jul;22(4):195-202. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12142. Epub 2015 May 29.
5
Implementing early rehabilitation and mobilisation for children in UK paediatric intensive care units: the PERMIT feasibility study.在英国儿科重症监护病房实施儿童早期康复和活动:PERMIT 可行性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2023 Nov;27(27):1-155. doi: 10.3310/HYRW5688.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Different temperature thresholds for antipyretic intervention in critically ill children with fever due to infection: the FEVER feasibility RCT.不同体温阈值用于感染性发热危重症患儿退热干预的可行性随机对照研究(FEVER 研究)
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Feb;23(5):1-148. doi: 10.3310/hta23050.
8
Parental experiences of end of life care decision-making for children with life-limiting conditions in the paediatric intensive care unit: a qualitative interview study.儿科重症监护病房中患有危及生命疾病的儿童的父母在临终关怀决策方面的体验:一项定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 9;9(5):e028548. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028548.
9
Parents' and young people's involvement in designing a trial of ventilator weaning.父母和年轻人参与呼吸机撤机试验的设计。
Nurs Crit Care. 2016 May;21(3):e10-8. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12221. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
10
Use of selective gut decontamination in critically ill children: PICnIC a pilot RCT and mixed-methods study.使用选择性肠道去污染在危重症儿童中的应用: PICnIC 一项先导 RCT 和混合方法研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Feb;28(8):1-84. doi: 10.3310/HDKV1008.

引用本文的文献

1
Current Consent Models Perpetuate Ignorance in Pediatric Critical Care.当前的同意模式使儿科重症监护中的无知长期存在。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2025 May 1;26(5):e748-e750. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003730. Epub 2025 Mar 14.

本文引用的文献

1
An evaluation of dexmedetomidine in combination with midazolam in pediatric sedation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.右美托咪定联合咪达唑仑在儿科镇静中的评估:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Jun 21;24(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02570-1.
2
Stakeholders' perspectives on clinical trial acceptability and approach to consent within a limited timeframe: a mixed methods study.利益相关者对临床试验可接受性和在有限时间内达成同意的方法的看法:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 2;14(1):e077023. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077023.
3
Selective digestive tract decontamination to prevent healthcare associated infections in critically ill children: the PICNIC multicentre randomised pilot clinical trial.
选择性消化道去污染预防危重症儿童医源性感染的 PICNIC 多中心随机对照 pilot 临床研究
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 7;13(1):21668. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46232-7.
4
How to Compose Platform Trials.如何设计平台试验。
Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Sep;9(5):715-718. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.10.016. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
5
Mixed-methods feasibility study to inform a randomised controlled trial of proton pump inhibitors to reduce strictures following neonatal surgery for oesophageal atresia.混合方法可行性研究,为质子泵抑制剂减少新生儿食管闭锁手术后狭窄的随机对照试验提供信息。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 20;13(4):e066070. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066070.
6
Platform trials: the future of medical research?平台试验:医学研究的未来?
Lancet Respir Med. 2023 Mar;11(3):232-233. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00052-8. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
7
The United Kingdom Paediatric Critical Care Society Study Group: The 20-Year Journey Toward Pragmatic, Randomized Clinical Trials.英国儿科重症监护学会研究组:迈向实用随机临床试验的 20 年历程。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2022 Dec 1;23(12):1067-1075. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003099. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
8
Economic Evaluation of Cost and Time Required for a Platform Trial vs Conventional Trials.平台试验与传统试验的成本和所需时间的经济评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2221140. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.21140.
9
Operational complexity versus design efficiency: challenges of implementing a phase IIa multiple parallel cohort targeted treatment platform trial in advanced breast cancer.操作复杂性与设计效率:在晚期乳腺癌中实施 IIa 期多平行队列靶向治疗平台试验的挑战。
Trials. 2022 May 7;23(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06312-x.
10
Lopinavir-ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine for critically ill patients with COVID-19: REMAP-CAP randomized controlled trial.洛匹那韦利托那韦和羟氯喹治疗 COVID-19 重症患者:REMAP-CAP 随机对照试验。
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Aug;47(8):867-886. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06448-5. Epub 2021 Jul 12.