Fostick Leah, Zwilling Moti, Babkoff Harvey
Department of Communication Disorders, Auditory Perception Lab in the Name of Laurent Levy, Ariel University, 40700, Ariel, Israel.
Department of Economics and Business Administration, Ariel University, 40700, Ariel, Israel.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 7;15(1):1062. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84082-z.
Large individual differences can be observed in studies reporting spectral TOJ. In the present study, we aimed to explore these individual differences and explain them by employing Warren and Ackroff (1976) framework of direct identification of components and their order (direct ICO) and holistic pattern recognition (HPR). In Experiment 1, results from 177 participants replicated the large variance in participants' performance and suggested three response patterns, validated using the K-Means clustering algorithm. In Experiment 2, the introduction of three tone-pairs to 90 participants, as opposed to a single pair, markedly decreased the propensity of participants to utilize HPR. Experiment 3 assessed 85 participants and demonstrated that diotic presentations significantly reduced the prevalence of HPR utilization. These results confirmed that direct ICO is used mainly when stimuli are difficult to group, and when grouping is possible, HPR is used. The results also show that these strategies are flexible and change according to the experimental manipulation. Spectral TOJ provides an opportunity to observe individual differences in auditory perception and facilitates the investigation of the diverse psychoacoustic cues underlying its performance.
在报告频谱时间顺序判断(TOJ)的研究中,可以观察到个体之间存在很大差异。在本研究中,我们旨在探讨这些个体差异,并通过采用沃伦和阿克罗夫(1976)的直接识别成分及其顺序(直接成分识别顺序,direct ICO)和整体模式识别(HPR)框架来解释这些差异。在实验1中,177名参与者的结果重复了参与者表现中的巨大差异,并提出了三种反应模式,使用K均值聚类算法进行了验证。在实验2中,与单一音对相比,向90名参与者引入三个音对显著降低了参与者使用HPR的倾向。实验3评估了85名参与者,结果表明双耳呈现显著降低了HPR使用的发生率。这些结果证实,当刺激难以分组时,主要使用直接成分识别顺序,而当可以分组时,则使用HPR。结果还表明,这些策略是灵活的,并会根据实验操作而改变。频谱TOJ为观察听觉感知中的个体差异提供了机会,并有助于研究其表现背后的各种心理声学线索。