Suppr超能文献

特异性免疫疗法联合生物制剂治疗变应性鼻炎和哮喘的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析

Efficacy and Safety of Specific Immunotherapy Combined with Biologics in Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Guan Dayu, Liu Yijun, Gu Yue, Zheng Bowen, Sun Rong, Shen Yang, Yang Yucheng

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China,

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2025 Jan 7:1-19. doi: 10.1159/000543023.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Allergic diseases are common clinical diseases. Although allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) and biologics have been widely recognized, the clinical efficacy, safety, advantages, and disadvantages of the combined application have not yet been sufficiently recognized. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of AIT combined with biologics in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched to identify studies investigating AIT combined with biologics for treating allergic rhinitis and asthma. The relevant outcome indicators, including incidences of emergency drug use, severe nasal symptoms, severe adverse effects (AEs), local reactions at the site of administration, headache, and general AEs, were collected and extracted. Routine and network meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan-5.4 and STATA-MP-14 to assess efficacy and safety.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs and a retrospective study involving 1,494 patients aged 5-65 years with allergic rhinitis and asthma were included in this review. (1) Routine meta-analysis revealed that AIT combined with biologics was significantly better than control treatment (placebo, AIT, or biologics) in terms of the incidence of emergency drug use, severe nasal symptoms, and severe AEs (p = 0.0002; p = 0.01; p = 0.02). However, the differences in the incidence of local reactions at the site of administration, headache, and general AEs were not significant. (2) In the network meta-analysis, compared with AIT or placebo alone, AIT combined with biologics observably reduced the incidence of emergency drug use and severe nasal symptoms (OR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.14-0.73; OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.26-0.63). Furthermore, AIT combined with biologics yielded an evidently lower incidence of serious adverse reactions than AIT alone (OR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.23-0.74).

CONCLUSION

The combined application of AIT and biologics has promising prospects in the clinical treatment of allergic rhinitis and asthma due to the improvement of both clinical efficacy and safety (trial registration: Systemic Review Registration; PROSPERO #CRD42024496277).

摘要

引言

过敏性疾病是常见的临床疾病。尽管变应原特异性免疫疗法(AIT)和生物制剂已得到广泛认可,但联合应用的临床疗效、安全性、优缺点尚未得到充分认识。我们旨在研究AIT联合生物制剂治疗过敏性鼻炎和哮喘患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

系统检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science,以确定研究AIT联合生物制剂治疗过敏性鼻炎和哮喘的研究。收集并提取相关结局指标,包括急救药物使用发生率、严重鼻部症状、严重不良反应(AE)、给药部位局部反应、头痛和一般AE。使用RevMan-5.4和STATA-MP-14进行常规和网状荟萃分析,以评估疗效和安全性。

结果

本综述纳入了8项随机对照试验和1项回顾性研究,涉及1494例年龄在5至65岁之间的过敏性鼻炎和哮喘患者。(1)常规荟萃分析显示,AIT联合生物制剂在急救药物使用发生率、严重鼻部症状和严重AE方面显著优于对照治疗(安慰剂、AIT或生物制剂)(p = 0.0002;p = 0.01;p = 0.02)。然而,给药部位局部反应、头痛和一般AE的发生率差异不显著。(2)在网状荟萃分析中,与单独使用AIT或安慰剂相比,AIT联合生物制剂显著降低了急救药物使用和严重鼻部症状的发生率(OR = 0.32,95%CI 0.14 - 0.73;OR = 0.41,95%CI:0.26 - 0.63)。此外,AIT联合生物制剂的严重不良反应发生率明显低于单独使用AIT(OR = 0.42,95%CI:0.23 - 0.74)。

结论

由于临床疗效和安全性均有所提高,AIT与生物制剂的联合应用在过敏性鼻炎和哮喘的临床治疗中具有广阔前景(试验注册:系统评价注册;PROSPERO #CRD42024496277)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验