Moreno Arianna R, Fisher Andrew D, Long Brit J, Douin David J, Wright Franklin L, Rizzo Julie A, April Michael D, Cohen Mitchell J, Getz Todd M, Schauer Steven G
Department of Emergency Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Fort Sam Houston, TX.
Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM.
Crit Care Med. 2025 Jan 1;53(1):e109-e116. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006477. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
To determine the association of whole blood and other blood products (components, prothrombin complex concentrate, and fibrinogen concentrate) with the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) among blood recipients.
Retrospective cohort study.
American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database between 2020 and 2021.
Patients 15 years old or older in the TQIP database between 2020 and 2022 who received at least one blood product.
We compared characteristics and blood product administration between patients who developed ARDS versus those who did not.
There were 134,863 that met inclusion for this analysis. Within the included population, 1% (1927) was diagnosed with ARDS. The no ARDS group had a lower portion of serious injuries to the head/neck (31% vs. 46%), thorax (51% vs. 78%), abdomen (34% vs. 48%), and extremities (37% vs. 47%). The median composite Injury Severity Score was 21 (11-30) in the no ARDS group vs. 30 (22-41) in the ARDS group. Unadjusted survival of discharge was 74% in the no ARDS group vs. 61% in the ARDS group. In our multivariable model, we found that whole blood (unit odds ratio [uOR], 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.07), male sex (odds ratio, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.28-1.63), arrival shock index (uOR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06), and composite Injury Severity Score (uOR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.03-1.04) were associated with the development of ARDS. These persisted on sensitivity testing.
We found an association between whole blood and the development of ARDS among trauma patients who received blood transfusions. Contrary to previous studies, we found no association between ARDS and fresh frozen plasma administration. The literature would benefit from further investigation via prospective study designs.
确定全血及其他血液制品(成分血、凝血酶原复合物浓缩剂和纤维蛋白原浓缩剂)与输血受者发生急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)之间的关联。
回顾性队列研究。
2020年至2021年美国外科医师学会创伤质量改进项目(TQIP)数据库。
2020年至2022年TQIP数据库中15岁及以上且接受至少一种血液制品的患者。
我们比较了发生ARDS的患者与未发生ARDS的患者的特征及血液制品输注情况。
共有134,863例符合本分析的纳入标准。在纳入人群中,1%(1927例)被诊断为ARDS。未发生ARDS组中,头部/颈部(31%对46%)、胸部(51%对78%)、腹部(34%对48%)和四肢(37%对47%)严重损伤的比例较低。未发生ARDS组的综合损伤严重程度评分中位数为21(11 - 30),而ARDS组为30(22 - 41)。未发生ARDS组出院时的未调整生存率为74%,而ARDS组为61%。在我们的多变量模型中,我们发现全血(单位比值比[uOR],1.05;95%置信区间[CI],1.02 - 1.07)、男性(比值比,1.44;95% CI,1.28 - 1.63)、入院时休克指数(uOR,1.03;95% CI,1.01 - 1.06)和综合损伤严重程度评分(uOR,1.03;95% CI,1.03 - 1.04)与ARDS的发生有关。这些在敏感性测试中持续存在。
我们发现全血与接受输血的创伤患者发生ARDS之间存在关联。与先前的研究相反,我们发现ARDS与输注新鲜冰冻血浆之间无关联。通过前瞻性研究设计进行进一步调查将使该领域的文献受益。