Quinn Kieran L, Stukel Thérèse A, Detsky Allan, Chung Hannah, Anwar Mohammed Rashidul, Bhatia Sacha, Downar James, Hung Vivian, Isenberg Sarina, Kurahashi Allison, Lee Douglas S, Stall Nathan, Tanuseputro Peter, Bell Chaim M
Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
ICES, Toronto and Ottawa, ON, Canada.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 8;20(1):e0313766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313766. eCollection 2025.
The expanded use of virtual care may worsen pre-existing disparities in use and delivery of end-of-life care among certain groups of people. We measured the use of virtual care in the last three months of life before and after the introduction of virtual care fee codes that funded care delivery at the start of COVID-19 on March 14, 2020, and identified changes in the characteristics of people using it.
We used linked clinical and administrative datasets to study use of virtual care in the last three months of life among 411,564 adults who died between January 25, 2018, and November 30, 2022. Modified Poisson regression was used to measure the association of the use of virtual care in the last three months of life with the pandemic study period and its association with each person- and physician-level factor.
14,261 people (8%) used virtual care in the last three months of life before the pandemic, and 161,000 people (69%) used it during the pandemic (relative risk [RR] 8.76; 95% CI 8.48-9.05). Several individual patient characteristics were associated with statistically significant increases in the use of virtual care after March 14, 2020 (following the introduction of virtual care fee codes), compared to before such as among older adults, ethnic minorities, multiple chronic comorbid health conditions and higher frailty groups.
The introduction of new fee codes broadening technology and funding for end-of-life care at the start of pandemic combined with pandemic-related effects was associated with a substantial increase in the use of virtual care near the end of life among certain groups and a general leveling of pre-existing disparities in its use. Virtual end-of-life care delivery may strengthen person-centredness for individuals with limited ability to attend in-person appointments and by providers who may not have previously engaged in such care.
虚拟护理的广泛应用可能会加剧某些人群在临终护理使用和提供方面预先存在的差异。我们测量了在2020年3月14日新冠疫情开始时为护理提供提供资金的虚拟护理费用代码引入前后,生命最后三个月中虚拟护理的使用情况,并确定了使用虚拟护理人群的特征变化。
我们使用了关联的临床和行政数据集,研究了2018年1月25日至2022年11月30日期间死亡的411,564名成年人在生命最后三个月中虚拟护理的使用情况。采用修正泊松回归来测量生命最后三个月中虚拟护理的使用与大流行研究期间的关联,以及与每个个体和医生层面因素的关联。
在大流行之前,有14,261人(8%)在生命的最后三个月使用了虚拟护理,在大流行期间有161,000人(69%)使用了虚拟护理(相对风险[RR]8.76;95%置信区间8.48 - 9.05)。与2020年3月14日(引入虚拟护理费用代码之后)之前相比,一些个体患者特征与虚拟护理使用的统计学显著增加相关,例如老年人、少数民族、患有多种慢性合并症的健康状况以及更高脆弱性群体。
在大流行开始时引入新的费用代码,拓宽了临终护理的技术和资金,再加上与大流行相关的影响,与某些群体在生命末期虚拟护理使用的大幅增加以及其使用中预先存在的差异的总体持平有关。虚拟临终护理的提供可能会增强那些亲自就诊能力有限的个体以及可能以前未参与此类护理的提供者的以人为本的理念。