• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

远程医疗在门诊姑息治疗环境中的应用:是否存在差异?

Telemedicine Utilization in the Ambulatory Palliative Care Setting: Are There Disparities?

机构信息

Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine (J.L.F.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA; Department of Population Health Science and Policy (A.B., M.M.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Institute for Healthcare Delivery, New York, New York, USA; Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (A.B., B.L., M.M.), New York, New York, USA; Department of Population Health Science and Policy (B.L.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Institute for Translational Epidemiology, New York, New York, USA; Ann B. Barshinger Cancer Institute (B.M.S.), University of Pennsylvania Health System, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, USA; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine (C.B.S.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine (J.L.F.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA; Department of Population Health Science and Policy (A.B., M.M.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Institute for Healthcare Delivery, New York, New York, USA; Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (A.B., B.L., M.M.), New York, New York, USA; Department of Population Health Science and Policy (B.L.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Institute for Translational Epidemiology, New York, New York, USA; Ann B. Barshinger Cancer Institute (B.M.S.), University of Pennsylvania Health System, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, USA; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine (C.B.S.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Mar;63(3):423-429. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.09.019. Epub 2021 Oct 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.09.019
PMID:34644615
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8854351/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Given a shortage of specialty palliative care clinicians and geographic variation in availability, telemedicine has been proposed as one way to improve access to palliative care services for patients with cancer. However, the enduring digital divide raises questions about whether unequal access will exacerbate healthcare disparities.

OBJECTIVES

To examine factors associated with utilization of telemedicine as compared to in-person visits by patients with cancer in the ambulatory palliative care setting.

METHODS

We collected data on patients seen in Supportive Oncology clinic by palliative care clinicians with an in-person or telemedicine visit from March 1 to December 30, 2020. A logistic regression with generalized estimating equation was fit to assess the association between visit type and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 491 patients and 1783 visits were identified, including 1061 (60%) in-person visits and 722 (40%) telemedicine visits. Female patients were significantly more likely to utilize telemedicine than male patients (OR 1.46; 95% CI 1.11-1.90). Spanish-speaking patients (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.17-0.61), those without insurance (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.15-0.52), and those without an activated patient portal (Inactivated: OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.26-0.82; Pending Activation: OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.18-0.48) were less likely to utilize telemedicine.

CONCLUSION

Our study reveals disparities in telemedicine utilization in the ambulatory palliative care setting for patients with cancer who are male, Spanish-speaking, uninsured, or do not have an activated patient portal. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, we can better meet the palliative care needs of patients with cancer through telemedicine only if equity is kept at the forefront of our discussions.

摘要

背景

鉴于专科姑息治疗临床医生短缺以及地域间可及性的差异,远程医疗已被提议作为改善癌症患者获得姑息治疗服务的一种方式。然而,持续存在的数字鸿沟引发了这样的问题,即不平等的获取途径是否会加剧医疗保健方面的差异。

目的

在姑息治疗门诊环境中,调查癌症患者利用远程医疗与门诊就诊的相关因素。

方法

我们收集了 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 12 月 30 日期间,姑息治疗临床医生通过门诊或远程医疗方式为支持性肿瘤学门诊就诊的患者进行的就诊数据。采用广义估计方程的逻辑回归分析来评估就诊类型与患者特征之间的关联。

结果

共确定了 491 名患者和 1783 次就诊,其中 1061 次(60%)为门诊就诊,722 次(40%)为远程医疗就诊。与男性患者相比,女性患者更倾向于利用远程医疗就诊(OR 1.46;95%CI 1.11-1.90)。西班牙语患者(OR 0.32,95%CI 0.17-0.61)、无保险者(OR 0.28,95%CI 0.15-0.52)和未激活患者门户者(未激活:OR 0.46,95%CI 0.26-0.82;待激活:OR 0.29,95%CI 0.18-0.48)较少利用远程医疗。

结论

我们的研究揭示了在姑息治疗门诊环境中,癌症患者利用远程医疗存在差异,这些差异与患者的性别、西班牙语使用情况、保险状况和患者门户激活情况有关。在 COVID-19 大流行之后,只有将公平性放在讨论的首位,我们才能通过远程医疗更好地满足癌症患者的姑息治疗需求。

相似文献

1
Telemedicine Utilization in the Ambulatory Palliative Care Setting: Are There Disparities?远程医疗在门诊姑息治疗环境中的应用:是否存在差异?
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Mar;63(3):423-429. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.09.019. Epub 2021 Oct 10.
2
Patient Use and Clinical Practice Patterns of Remote Cardiology Clinic Visits in the Era of COVID-19.新冠疫情时期远程心脏病学诊所就诊的患者使用情况和临床实践模式。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e214157. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.4157.
3
Disparities in telemedicine utilization among surgical patients during COVID-19.新冠疫情期间手术患者远程医疗利用的差异。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 8;16(10):e0258452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258452. eCollection 2021.
4
Sociodemographic Disparities in Ambulatory Pediatric Telemedicine Utilization During COVID-19.COVID-19 期间门诊儿科远程医疗使用中的社会人口统计学差异
Telemed J E Health. 2024 Jan;30(1):57-66. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0005. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
5
Disparities in Telemedicine Success and Their Association With Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Thoracic Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠肺炎大流行期间,胸科癌症患者远程医疗效果的差异及其与不良结局的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2220543. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.20543.
6
Disparities in telemedicine access for Spanish-speaking patients during the COVID-19 crisis.西班牙语患者在 COVID-19 危机期间远程医疗机会的差距。
Pediatr Dermatol. 2021 Jul;38(4):947-949. doi: 10.1111/pde.14489. Epub 2020 Dec 27.
7
Virtualized clinical studies to assess the natural history and impact of gut microbiome modulation in non-hospitalized patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 a randomized, open-label, prospective study with a parallel group study evaluating the physiologic effects of KB109 on gut microbiota structure and function: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled study.用于评估非住院轻中度 COVID-19 患者肠道微生物组调节的自然史和影响的虚拟化临床研究:一项随机、开放标签、前瞻性研究,平行组研究评估 KB109 对肠道微生物组结构和功能的生理影响:一项随机对照研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Apr 2;22(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05157-0.
8
Rapid Conversion of a Palliative Care Outpatient Clinic to Telehealth.快速将姑息治疗门诊转为远程医疗。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Jan;17(1):e62-e67. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00557. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
9
Disparities in Telemedicine Access: A Cross-Sectional Study of a Newly Established Infrastructure during the COVID-19 Pandemic.远程医疗获取机会的差异:COVID-19 大流行期间新建立的基础设施的横断面研究。
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 May;12(3):445-458. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1730026. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
10
Sociodemographic disparities in the use of cardiovascular ambulatory care and telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,心血管门诊护理和远程医疗使用的社会人口统计学差异。
Am Heart J. 2023 Sep;263:169-176. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.06.011. Epub 2023 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital Health Technology Use Among Spanish Speakers in the US: A Scoping Review.美国说西班牙语人群对数字健康技术的使用:一项范围综述
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2510386. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.10386.
2
Advancing cancer care through digital access in the USA: a state-of-the-art review of patient portals in oncology.通过美国的数字接入推进癌症护理:肿瘤学患者门户网站的最新综述
BMJ Oncol. 2025 Jan 7;4(1):e000432. doi: 10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000432. eCollection 2025.
3
More than 3 years of teleconsultations: A retrospective cohort study in specialized outpatient palliative care.超过3年的远程会诊:一项针对专科门诊姑息治疗的回顾性队列研究。
Palliat Med. 2025 Apr;39(4):499-506. doi: 10.1177/02692163251321717. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
4
Telehealth adoption in palliative care: a systematic review of patient barriers and facilitators.姑息治疗中远程医疗的应用:患者障碍与促进因素的系统评价
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Feb 26;24(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01698-2.
5
"Telehealth Allows for Flexibility and More Equity": Provider Perspectives on Telehealth for Outpatient Palliative Care for Underserved Patients.“远程医疗提供灵活性与更多公平性”:医疗服务提供者对为服务不足患者提供门诊姑息治疗的远程医疗的看法
J Palliat Med. 2025 May;28(5):655-660. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2024.0525. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
6
Use of virtual care near the end of life before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A population-based cohort study.COVID-19大流行之前及期间临终时虚拟护理的使用:一项基于人群的队列研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 8;20(1):e0313766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313766. eCollection 2025.
7
Transforming patient-centered cancer care using telehealth: the MATCHES Center.利用远程医疗改变以患者为中心的癌症护理:MATCHES 中心。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2024 Jun 26;2024(64):76-82. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgae004.
8
Clinician Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators for Delivering Early Integrated Palliative Care via Telehealth.临床医生对通过远程医疗提供早期综合姑息治疗的障碍和促进因素的看法。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 9;15(22):5340. doi: 10.3390/cancers15225340.
9
The association between telemedicine, advance care planning, and unplanned hospitalizations among high-risk patients with cancer.远程医疗、预先医疗照护计划与癌症高危患者非计划性住院之间的关联。
Cancer. 2024 Feb 15;130(4):636-644. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35116. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
10
Strategies to Make Telemedicine a Friend, Not a Foe, in the Provision of Accessible and Equitable Cancer Care.在提供可及且公平的癌症护理方面,让远程医疗成为助力而非阻碍的策略。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Oct 24;15(21):5121. doi: 10.3390/cancers15215121.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers to telehealth access among homebound older adults.居家老年患者远程医疗服务利用障碍。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Sep;69(9):2404-2411. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17163. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
2
Palliative Care Specialist Access is Associated With Rankings of Hospital Quality.姑息治疗专家的可及性与医院质量排名相关。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Jul;62(1):149-152. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.02.013. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
3
The Digital Divide: Do Older Adults with Serious Illness Access Telemedicine?数字鸿沟:患有严重疾病的老年人能否使用远程医疗?
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Mar;37(4):984-986. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06629-4. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
4
Telehealth Use Among Safety-Net Organizations in California During the COVID-19 Pandemic.加利福尼亚州在 COVID-19 大流行期间的医疗服务利用情况
JAMA. 2021 Mar 16;325(11):1106-1107. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0282.
5
Variation In Telemedicine Use And Outpatient Care During The COVID-19 Pandemic In The United States.美国 COVID-19 大流行期间远程医疗使用和门诊护理的变化。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Feb;40(2):349-358. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01786.
6
Differences in the use of telephone and video telemedicine visits during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,电话和视频远程医疗就诊的使用差异。
Am J Manag Care. 2021 Jan;27(1):21-26. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88573.
7
Patient Characteristics Associated With Telemedicine Access for Primary and Specialty Ambulatory Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic.与 COVID-19 大流行期间初级和专科门诊远程医疗访问相关的患者特征。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2031640. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.31640.
8
Rapid Conversion of a Palliative Care Outpatient Clinic to Telehealth.快速将姑息治疗门诊转为远程医疗。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Jan;17(1):e62-e67. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00557. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
9
Trends in Outpatient Care Delivery and Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the US.美国新冠疫情期间门诊医疗服务与远程医疗的趋势
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Mar 1;181(3):388-391. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5928.
10
Prevalence and Characteristics of Telehealth Utilization in the United States.美国远程医疗使用的现状和特征。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2022302. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.22302.