• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一组埃及儿童样本中使用牙齿和手腕X光片进行年龄估计。

Age estimation using dental and hand-wrist radiography among a sample of Egyptian children.

作者信息

Abd Elmaguid Kaka Rania, Ismail Mohamed Haiba Marwa, Abd Elmoneim Sheta Abeer, Hassan Salama Naglaa, Mostafa Enany Nagwa

机构信息

Forensic Medicine and Clinical Toxicology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 7;15(1):1056. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83638-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-83638-3
PMID:39775028
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11707342/
Abstract

The current study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of Willems, Cameriere's and Greulich and Pyle method in age estimation among a sample of Egyptian children aged 8-16 years based on analysis of 140 panoramic dental X-ray and hand-wrist radiographs (70 girls and 70 boys). Using Willems method, the mean dental age underestimated chronological age by (0.20 ± 0.91 years) for boys and by (0.24 ± 1.33 year) for girls; these differences were not statistically significant. Also, Cameriere's method underestimated chronological age in both sexes by mean difference of (1.10 ± 1.22 year) in boys and (1.13 ± 1.31 year) in girls; these differences were statistically significant. Regarding Greulich and Pyle atlas, the mean of skeletal age was overestimated when compared to the real age in boys with a mean difference (0.04 ± 0.86 year). In girls; the age was underestimated by a mean difference of (0.15 ± 1.32 years) when compared to chronological age; these differences were not statistically significant. Comparing the two dental methods, the mean absolute error using Willems method was less than one year (0.94 and 0.96 years) in boys and girls respectively, while in Cameriere's method, it was more than one year in both groups. Moreover; the mean absolute error using Greulich and Pyle atlas was less than two years (1.02 and 1.38 years) in boys and girls respectively. Since Willems and the atlas methods were more accurate, the combination of both of them could be used for age estimation in the Egyptian population.

摘要

本研究旨在基于对140张全景牙科X光片和手腕X光片(70名女孩和70名男孩)的分析,评估威廉姆斯法、卡梅里埃法以及格罗利希和派尔法在8至16岁埃及儿童样本年龄估计中的准确性。使用威廉姆斯法,男孩的平均牙龄比实际年龄低估了(0.20±0.91岁),女孩低估了(0.24±1.33岁);这些差异无统计学意义。此外,卡梅里埃法在两性中均低估了实际年龄,男孩的平均差异为(1.10±1.22岁),女孩为(1.13±1.31岁);这些差异具有统计学意义。关于格罗利希和派尔图谱,与男孩的实际年龄相比,骨骼年龄的平均值被高估,平均差异为(0.04±0.86岁)。在女孩中,与实际年龄相比,年龄被低估,平均差异为(0.15±1.32岁);这些差异无统计学意义。比较两种牙科方法,使用威廉姆斯法时,男孩和女孩的平均绝对误差分别小于1年(0.94和

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e6e/11707342/7f54e6bccd74/41598_2024_83638_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e6e/11707342/d72ac6bfec68/41598_2024_83638_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e6e/11707342/7f54e6bccd74/41598_2024_83638_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e6e/11707342/d72ac6bfec68/41598_2024_83638_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e6e/11707342/7f54e6bccd74/41598_2024_83638_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Age estimation using dental and hand-wrist radiography among a sample of Egyptian children.在一组埃及儿童样本中使用牙齿和手腕X光片进行年龄估计。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 7;15(1):1056. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83638-3.
2
A comparison of the accuracy of Willems' and Cameriere's methods based on panoramic radiography.基于全景片的 Willems 法和 Cameriere 法准确性的比较。
Forensic Sci Int. 2019 Sep;302:109912. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109912. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
3
Dental maturity assessment in Serbian population: A comparison of Cameriere's European formula and Willems' method.塞尔维亚人群的牙齿成熟度评估:卡梅里埃欧洲公式与威廉姆斯方法的比较
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Jul;288:331.e1-331.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.04.019. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
4
Accuracy of the London Atlas, Haavikko's Method and Cameriere's European Formula of dental age estimation in Turkish children.伦敦图谱、哈维科氏法和卡梅里耶欧洲公式在土耳其儿童牙龄评估中的准确性。
Leg Med (Tokyo). 2022 Feb;54:101991. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2021.101991. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
5
Accuracy of methods of age estimation in predicting dental age of preadolescents in South Indian children.南印度儿童青春期前儿童牙龄预测中年龄估计方法的准确性。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2016 Oct;43:21-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
6
The reliability of Cameriere's method in Turkish children: a preliminary report.卡梅里埃方法在土耳其儿童中的可靠性:初步报告。
Forensic Sci Int. 2015 Apr;249:319.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.01.031. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
7
Evaluation of Cameriere and Willems age estimation methods in panoramic radiographs of Brazilian children.评价卡米雷尔和威廉姆斯在巴西儿童全景片中的年龄估计方法。
J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2020 Dec 30;38(3):8-15.
8
Age estimation of children based on open apex measurement in the developing permanent dentition: an Egyptian formula.基于恒牙发育中开骀测量的儿童年龄估计:埃及公式。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Apr;27(4):1529-1539. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04773-7. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
9
Age Estimation in Mixed-dentition Children, Using Cameriere's European Formula and Demirjian's Method: A Comparative Pilot Study.使用卡梅里耶欧洲公式和德米尔坚方法对混合牙列期儿童进行年龄估计:一项比较性初步研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Mar 1;21(3):310-316.
10
Evaluating the agreement of skeletal age assessment based on hand-wrist and cervical vertebrae radiography.评估基于手-腕和颈椎射线摄影的骨骼年龄评估的一致性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Dec;144(6):838-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.07.015.

引用本文的文献

1
Dental age estimation using open apices in Egyptian children from Mediterranean region.利用地中海地区埃及儿童的开放根尖进行牙龄估计。
Oral Radiol. 2025 Sep 13. doi: 10.1007/s11282-025-00854-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of different machine learning approaches to predict dental age using Demirjian's staging approach.比较不同机器学习方法预测使用 Demirjian 分期法的牙龄。
Int J Legal Med. 2021 Mar;135(2):665-675. doi: 10.1007/s00414-020-02489-5. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
2
Assessment of dental age estimation methods applied to Brazilian children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.评估应用于巴西儿童的牙龄估计方法:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021 Feb 1;50(2):20200128. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20200128. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
3
Comparison of three methods to estimate dental age in children.
比较三种方法估算儿童牙龄。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Jul;24(7):2469-2475. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03109-2. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
4
A Comparison of 3 Established Skeletal Age Estimation Methods in an African Group From Benin and an Italian Group From Southern Italy.三种成熟度评估方法在贝宁非洲人群和意大利南部意大利人群中的比较。
Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2019 Jun;40(2):125-128. doi: 10.1097/PAF.0000000000000472.
5
The Demirjian versus the Willems method for dental age estimation in different populations: A meta-analysis of published studies.不同人群中用于牙齿年龄估计的德米尔坚法与威廉姆斯法:已发表研究的荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 8;12(11):e0186682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186682. eCollection 2017.
6
A comparison of the validity of the Demirjian, Willems, Nolla and Häävikko methods in determination of chronological age of 5-15 year-old Indian children.比较德米尔坚法、威廉姆斯法、诺拉法和哈伊维科法在确定5至15岁印度儿童实际年龄方面的有效性。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2017 Aug;50:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2017.07.007. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
7
Dental age estimation in Egyptian children, comparison between two methods.埃及儿童的牙齿年龄估计:两种方法的比较
J Forensic Leg Med. 2010 Oct;17(7):363-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2010.05.008. Epub 2010 Jul 15.
8
Age estimation in children by measurement of open apices in teeth.通过测量儿童牙齿的开放根尖来估计年龄。
Int J Legal Med. 2006 Jan;120(1):49-52. doi: 10.1007/s00414-005-0047-9. Epub 2005 Nov 10.
9
Dental age estimation in Belgian children: Demirjian's technique revisited.比利时儿童的牙齿年龄估计:重新审视德米尔坚方法。
J Forensic Sci. 2001 Jul;46(4):893-5.
10
Age estimation: the state of the art in relation to the specific demands of forensic practise.年龄估计:与法医实践的特定需求相关的最新技术水平
Int J Legal Med. 2000;113(3):129-36. doi: 10.1007/s004140050283.