Huang Xinyue, Zhang Ruonan, Yu Xueqian, Sun Wenting, Zhang Lu, Hua Fang, Chen Zhi
State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Department of Cariology and Endodontics School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jan 7;29(1):50. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06127-x.
To summarize and analyze existing evidence regarding the clinical performance of high-viscosity glass-ionomer-based materials (HVGIs) and bulk-fill resin-based composites (BFs) in patients with occlusal or proximal cavities in permanent teeth.
A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science (WOS) (last update: April 19th, 2024). Randomized control trials (RCTs), retrospective and prospective comparative cohorts were included. Manual searching was performed for twelve relevant dental journals. The primary outcome was the retention of the restoration. The evaluation of included studies, data extraction, and study selection were completed by two independent reviewers. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2) and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used to assess the quality of included studies. A quantitative meta-analysis was conducted, and the overall quality of the evidence was evaluated.
Five RCTs and one retrospective study were included, of which one had a high risk of bias and the others had an unclear risk of bias. In meta-analyses, HVGIs were associated with a less favorable outcome on retention both at one (p = 0.013) and two-year follow-ups (p < 0.0001) compared with BFs. The quality of the evidence was very low.
Very low certainty evidence suggested that BFs presented favorable clinical performance on retention and marginal adaptation in Class I and II restorations in permanent teeth comparing HVGIs. Nevertheless, HVGIs with a resin-based coating showed acceptable clinical behavior.
For patients with a high caries risk, HVGIs serve as a direct restorative alternative for the posterior permanent teeth; however, they should be carefully considered as bulk-fill composite resin alternatives for long-term restoration.
PROSPERO (CRD42024535999).
总结并分析关于高粘度玻璃离子基材料(HVGIs)和大块充填树脂基复合材料(BFs)在恒牙咬合面或邻面龋洞患者中临床性能的现有证据。
使用PubMed、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science(WOS)(最后更新日期:2024年4月19日)进行文献检索。纳入随机对照试验(RCTs)、回顾性和前瞻性比较队列研究。对12种相关牙科期刊进行手工检索。主要结局是修复体的保留情况。由两名独立 reviewers 完成对纳入研究的评估、数据提取和研究选择。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具(RoB 2)和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估纳入研究的质量。进行定量荟萃分析,并评估证据的整体质量。
纳入了5项RCTs和1项回顾性研究,其中1项存在高偏倚风险,其他研究的偏倚风险不明确。在荟萃分析中,与BFs相比,HVGIs在1年(p = 0.013)和2年随访时(p < 0.0001)的保留结局均较差。证据质量非常低。
极低确定性证据表明,与HVGIs相比,BFs在恒牙I类和II类修复体的保留和边缘适应性方面表现出良好的临床性能。然而,具有树脂基涂层的HVGIs表现出可接受的临床行为。
对于高龋风险患者,HVGIs可作为后牙恒牙的直接修复替代材料;然而,作为长期修复的大块充填复合树脂替代材料时应谨慎考虑。
PROSPERO(CRD42024535999)