McLeod Julie, Estcourt Claudia S, MacDonald Jennifer, Gibbs Jo, Woode Owusu Melvina, Mapp Fiona, Gallego Marquez Nuria, McInnes-Dean Amelia, Saunders John M, Blandford Ann, Flowers Paul
School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, England, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 8;20(1):e0315049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315049. eCollection 2025.
The ability to access and navigate online sexual health information and support is increasingly needed in order to engage with wider sexual healthcare. However, people from underserved populations may struggle to pass though this "digital doorway". Therefore, using a behavioural science approach, we first aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to i) seeking online sexual health information and ii) seeking online sexual health support. Subsequently, we aimed to generate theory-informed recommendations to improve these access points.
The PROGRESSPlus framework guided purposive recruitment (15.10.21-18.03.22) of 35 UK participants from diverse backgrounds, including 51% from the most deprived areas and 26% from minoritised ethnic groups. Using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis, we identified barriers and facilitators to seeking online sexual health information and support. A Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) analysis then identified recommendations to better meet the needs of underserved populations.
We found diverse barriers and facilitators. Barriers included low awareness of and familiarity with online information and support; perceptions that online information and support were unlikely to meet the needs of underserved populations; overwhelming volume of information sources; lack of personal relevancy; chatbots/automated responses; and response wait times. Facilitators included clarity about credibility and quality; inclusive content; and in-person assistance. Recommendations included: Education and Persuasion e.g., online and offline promotion and endorsement by healthcare professionals and peers; Training and Modelling e.g., accessible training to enhance searching skills and credibility appraisal; and Environmental Restructuring and Enablement e.g., modifications to ensure online information and support are simple and easy to use, including video/audio options for content.
Given that access to many sexual health services is now digital, our analyses produced recommendations pivotal to increasing access to wider sexual healthcare among underserved populations. Implementing these recommendations could reduce inequalities associated with accessing and using online sexual health service.
为了获得更广泛的性健康护理,人们越来越需要具备访问和浏览在线性健康信息及支持的能力。然而,服务不足人群可能难以跨越这一“数字门槛”。因此,我们首先采用行为科学方法,旨在确定阻碍和促进因素,以探讨:一是寻求在线性健康信息的阻碍和促进因素;二是寻求在线性健康支持的阻碍和促进因素。随后,我们旨在提出基于理论的建议,以改善这些接入点。
PROGRESSPlus框架指导了有目的的招募工作(2021年10月15日至2022年3月18日),招募了35名来自不同背景的英国参与者,其中51%来自最贫困地区,26%来自少数族裔群体。通过半结构化访谈和主题分析,我们确定了寻求在线性健康信息和支持的阻碍和促进因素。然后,通过行为改变轮(BCW)分析确定了更好满足服务不足人群需求的建议。
我们发现了各种各样的阻碍和促进因素。阻碍包括对在线信息和支持的认识和熟悉程度低;认为在线信息和支持不太可能满足服务不足人群的需求;信息来源过多;缺乏个人相关性;聊天机器人/自动回复;以及回复等待时间。促进因素包括对可信度和质量的明确;包容性内容;以及面对面的帮助。建议包括:教育与说服,例如医疗保健专业人员和同行进行线上和线下推广及认可;培训与示范,例如提供易于获取的培训以提高搜索技能和可信度评估能力;环境重构与赋能,例如进行改进以确保在线信息和支持简单易用,包括提供内容的视频/音频选项。
鉴于现在许多性健康服务都已数字化,我们的分析提出了一些建议,这些建议对于增加服务不足人群获得更广泛性健康护理的机会至关重要。实施这些建议可以减少在获取和使用在线性健康服务方面的不平等现象。