Alqurashi Helal B, Masud Tahir, Gordon Adam Lee, Piasecki Mathew, O'Connor Dominic, Robinson Katie, Gladman John R F
School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Applied Medical Science, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Eur Geriatr Med. 2025 Apr;16(2):635-643. doi: 10.1007/s41999-024-01133-4. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is a potentially effective intervention to improve outcomes after a fragility fracture, but its feasibility in this group has not been established.
A feasibility study was conducted in two phases: 1) in the hospital only, and 2) hospital, rehabilitation centres, and participants' homes. Patients with fragility fracture were randomised to receive NMES for 6 weeks/discharge either to the right or left leg, with the other leg serving as control. Patients who had no mobility issues had contraindications to NMES and were unable to give consent were excluded. NMES was applied to quadriceps and tibialis anterior muscles for 30 min, 3 days/week. Sessions were progressed to achieve 60 min, 5-7 days/week. Feasibility outcomes included participant characteristics, recruitment rate, tolerability, and number of NMES sessions. Clinical outcomes included muscle strength, and ADL at six months.
Overall, 1052 patients were identified, of whom 113 (11%) were eligible, and 29 (3%) were recruited (median Clinical Frailty Score 3, median Barthel ADL score 93/100). The recruitment rate was 0.45/week in phase 1 and 0.9/week in phase 2. Fifty-three percent achieved the target of 24 NMES sessions. However, 5/29 withdrew due to intolerance of NMES. Leg muscle strength improved in both treated and untreated legs, with marginally greater improvement observed in the tibialis anterior of treated legs.
Although it would be feasible to evaluate the specific effect of NMES in fragility fracture patients in a multi-centre trial using home-based NMES, this would be possible only in a minority of mildly frail fragility fracture patients with little premorbid disability.
神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)是一种潜在有效的干预措施,可改善脆性骨折后的预后,但尚未确定其在该群体中的可行性。
进行了一项分两个阶段的可行性研究:1)仅在医院内,2)医院、康复中心和参与者家中。脆性骨折患者被随机分配接受为期6周/出院的NMES治疗,刺激右腿或左腿,另一条腿作为对照。排除无行动能力问题、有NMES禁忌症且无法给予知情同意的患者。将NMES应用于股四头肌和胫前肌,每次30分钟,每周3天。疗程逐步增加至每次60分钟,每周5 - 7天。可行性结果包括参与者特征、招募率、耐受性和NMES疗程数。临床结果包括肌肉力量和6个月时的日常生活活动能力。
总体而言,共识别出1052例患者,其中113例(11%)符合条件,29例(3%)被招募(临床衰弱评分中位数为3,巴氏日常生活活动能力评分中位数为93/100)。第1阶段的招募率为每周0.45例,第2阶段为每周0.9例。53%的患者达到了24次NMES疗程的目标。然而,29例中有5例因不耐受NMES而退出。治疗腿和未治疗腿的腿部肌肉力量均有所改善,治疗腿的胫前肌改善幅度略大。
尽管在多中心试验中使用家庭式NMES评估NMES对脆性骨折患者的具体效果是可行的,但这仅适用于少数病前残疾程度较轻的轻度衰弱脆性骨折患者。