Suppr超能文献

维奈克拉联合阿扎胞苷治疗新诊断年轻急性髓系白血病患者的单中心经验

Single-center experience of venetoclax combined with azacitidine in young patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.

作者信息

Xu Xuezhu, Liu Rui, Chen Hongli, Yang Ruoyu, Gao Gongzhizi, He Aili, Wang Fangxia

机构信息

Department of Hematology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

Xi'an Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Hematological Diseases, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

出版信息

Ther Adv Hematol. 2025 Jan 6;16:20406207241311776. doi: 10.1177/20406207241311776. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medical resources, especially blood products, were in short supply during the COVID-19. Less intensive therapy with hypomethylating agents/venetoclax (VEN) seems an effective treatment option for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

OBJECTIVES

To retrospectively analyze the efficacy and safety of VEN combined with azacitidine (AZA) in young adult patients with newly diagnosed (ND) AML.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective study.

METHODS

The clinical data of 25 AML patients treated with the VEN + AZA regimen from January 2021 to December 2023 at our center were collected, compared with a randomized historical study cohort that was administered intensive chemotherapy (IC) from January 2018 to December 2019.

RESULTS

No rate of complete remission/complete remission with incomplete count recovery differences observed between the two arms reached statistical significance. Compared to traditional IC, minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative remission was achieved more quickly in patients treated with VEN + AZA regimens (after cycle 1: 8% in the IC group vs 56% in the VEN group, = 0.0004; after cycle 2: 16% in the IC group vs 72% in the VEN group, = 0.0001), especially in those AML patients who had a poor prognosis. The dependency of transfusion of red blood cell (RBC) and platelets during induction treatment was significantly lower in the VEN + AZA group (RBC: = 0.0269; platelet: = 0.0054). Compared with the standard IC, the incidence rate of non-hematological adverse events in VEN + AZA group was significantly decreased (infection: 100% vs 20%, = 0.0001; gastrointestinal side effects: 48% vs 12%, = 0.0055). The total hospitalization cost of the VEN group was significantly less than that of the IC group ( = 0.0395).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our study indicated that VEN + AZA with a higher MRD-negative remission rate and less toxic appeared to be a therapy option for young patients with ND AML. However, further well-designed studies with larger numbers of patients are needed to confirm the benefits of VEN + AZA in this population.

摘要

背景

在新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)疫情期间,医疗资源,尤其是血液制品供应短缺。对于急性髓系白血病(AML)患者,使用低甲基化药物/维奈克拉(VEN)进行强度较低的治疗似乎是一种有效的治疗选择。

目的

回顾性分析VEN联合阿扎胞苷(AZA)治疗新诊断(ND)AML青年患者的疗效和安全性。

设计

这是一项回顾性研究。

方法

收集2021年1月至2023年12月在本中心接受VEN + AZA方案治疗的25例AML患者的临床资料,并与2018年1月至2019年12月接受强化化疗(IC)的随机历史研究队列进行比较。

结果

两组之间完全缓解/血细胞计数未完全恢复的完全缓解率差异未达到统计学意义。与传统IC相比,接受VEN + AZA方案治疗的患者达到微小残留病(MRD)阴性缓解的速度更快(第1周期后:IC组为8%,VEN组为56%,P = 0.0004;第2周期后:IC组为16%,VEN组为72%,P = 0.0001),尤其是在预后较差的AML患者中。VEN + AZA组诱导治疗期间红细胞(RBC)和血小板的输血依赖性显著降低(RBC:P = 0.0269;血小板:P = 0.0054)。与标准IC相比,VEN + AZA组非血液学不良事件的发生率显著降低(感染:100%对20%,P = 0.0001;胃肠道副作用:48%对12%,P = 0.0055)。VEN组的总住院费用显著低于IC组(P = 0.0395)。

结论

总之,我们的研究表明,VEN + AZA具有较高的MRD阴性缓解率且毒性较小,似乎是ND AML青年患者的一种治疗选择。然而,需要进一步设计更完善、样本量更大的研究来证实VEN + AZA在该人群中的益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/899f/11705358/2d42835139a3/10.1177_20406207241311776-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验