• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大量听力图的分析方法。

Methods of analysis of large numbers of audiograms.

作者信息

Verschuure J, van den Wijngaart W S, Brocaar M P, Nagels M M

出版信息

Audiology. 1985;24(1):2-14. doi: 10.3109/00206098509070092.

DOI:10.3109/00206098509070092
PMID:3977780
Abstract

The analysis of large numbers of audiograms raises the question if and how we can reduce the amount of data without discarding essential information. The present paper compares two ways of data reduction: principal-component analysis and curve fitting. The methods are tested on the audiograms of a large family suffering from a dominant hereditary, progressive hearing loss, beginning in the high frequencies. It is shown that principal-component analysis rejects information on the shape of the audiogram, as do all methods generally referred to as factor analysis. The information concerned is essential for our understanding of the patient's ability to discriminate speech. Curve-fitting procedures are shown to be effective in data reduction.

摘要

对大量听力图的分析提出了这样一个问题

我们是否能够以及如何在不丢弃重要信息的情况下减少数据量。本文比较了两种数据简化方法:主成分分析和曲线拟合。这些方法在一个患有显性遗传性进行性听力损失(始于高频)的大家族的听力图上进行了测试。结果表明,主成分分析会舍弃听力图形状的信息,所有通常称为因子分析的方法也是如此。所涉及的信息对于我们理解患者辨别语音的能力至关重要。结果表明,曲线拟合程序在数据简化方面是有效的。

相似文献

1
Methods of analysis of large numbers of audiograms.大量听力图的分析方法。
Audiology. 1985;24(1):2-14. doi: 10.3109/00206098509070092.
2
A follow-up study in a family with dominant progressive inner ear deafness.一项针对显性进行性内耳性耳聋家族的随访研究。
Acta Otolaryngol. 1983 May-Jun;95(5-6):620-6. doi: 10.3109/00016488309139453.
3
Follow-up study in a family with dominant progressive hereditary sensorineural hearing impairment. I. Analysis of hearing deterioration.一个显性进行性遗传性感音神经性听力损失家系的随访研究。I. 听力减退分析。
Audiology. 1985;24(4):233-40. doi: 10.3109/00206098509070107.
4
[A software tool for pure-tone audiometry: Classification of audiograms for inclusion of patients in clinical trials. German version].
HNO. 2015 Dec;63(12):857-62. doi: 10.1007/s00106-015-0093-7.
5
A software tool for pure‑tone audiometry. Classification of audiograms for inclusion of patients in clinical trials. English version.一种用于纯音听力测定的软件工具。用于在临床试验中纳入患者的听力图分类。英文版。
HNO. 2016 Mar;64 Suppl 1:S1-6. doi: 10.1007/s00106-015-0089-3.
6
Low-frequency sensorineural loss: clinical evaluation and implications for hearing aid fitting.低频感音神经性听力损失:临床评估及其对助听器验配的意义
Ear Hear. 1994 Feb;15(1):71-81.
7
Heterogeneity of dominant high-frequency sensorineural deafness.显性高频感音神经性聋的异质性
Clin Genet. 1988 Jun;33(6):424-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1988.tb03475.x.
8
[Characteristics of sensorineural hearing loss secondary to inner ear acoustic trauma].[内耳声学创伤继发感音神经性听力损失的特征]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2008 May-Jun;136(5-6):221-5. doi: 10.2298/sarh0806221s.
9
Mobile tablet audiometry in fluctuating autoimmune ear disease.波动性自身免疫性耳部疾病中的移动平板听力测定法
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Mar 7;46(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40463-017-0195-1.
10
Noncongenital hereditary hearing loss in children. Prospective documentation.儿童非先天性遗传性听力损失。前瞻性记录。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991 Mar;117(3):332-5. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1991.01870150100015.

引用本文的文献

1
Easy as 1-2-3: Development and Evaluation of a Simple yet Valid Audiogram-Classification System.易如1-2-3:一种简单而有效的听力图分类系统的开发与评估
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241260041. doi: 10.1177/23312165241260041.
2
High-frequency audiometry in the evaluation of critical noise intensity.用于评估临界噪声强度的高频听力测定法。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1989;61(5):347-51. doi: 10.1007/BF00409391.
3
Methodological implications of interaural correlation: count heads not ears.双耳相关性的方法学意义:数人头而非耳朵。
Percept Psychophys. 1990 Sep;48(3):291-4. doi: 10.3758/bf03211533.
4
In defense of the right and left audiograms: a reply to Coren (1989) and Coren and Hakstian (1990).为左右耳听力图辩护:对科伦(1989年)以及科伦和哈克斯蒂安(1990年)的回应
Percept Psychophys. 1992 Jul;52(1):107-10. doi: 10.3758/bf03206763.