Suppr超能文献

患者使用电子咨询替代其他全科医生服务:横断面调查研究。

Patients' Use of e-Consultations as an Alternative to Other General Practitioner Services: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

作者信息

Kristiansen Eli, Atherton Helen, Austad Bjarne, Bergmo Trine Strand, Norberg Børge Lønnebakke, Salisbury Chris, Zanaboni Paolo

机构信息

Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 8;27:e55158. doi: 10.2196/55158.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

e-Consultations, defined as asynchronous text-based messaging, have transformed how patients interact with their general practitioner (GP). While e-consultations can improve patient access to GP care, concerns about increased workload for GPs are raised.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to address three research questions: (1) For what purpose and with what expectations do patients initiate e-consultations? (2) If e-consultations had not been available, what alternative actions would the patient have taken? and (3) How are the alternative actions associated with patient and e-consultation characteristics?

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted through a web-based survey on Helsenorge. Helsenorge is the national citizen portal for digital health services in Norway, including e-consultations with the GP. All users who sent e-consultations through Helsenorge were invited to participate between January and February 2023. The survey addressed questions on users' expectations and experience with e-consultations. The association between patient and e-consultation characteristics and alternative actions to e-consultations were analyzed using multinomial logistic regression.

RESULTS

Overall, 13,011 users answered the survey. The most common reason for initiating an e-consultation was requesting a sick certificate (4940/13,011, 38%). Overall, 68.7% (8802/13,011) of respondents expected an answer within 24 hours, and 17.7% (2310/13,011) anticipated that the GP would ask them to attend a physical examination. If e-consultations had not been available, 45.5% (5917/13,011) of respondents would have booked a GP appointment, and 44.9% (5846/13,011) would have called the front desk. Users who expected a quicker response (odds ratio [OR] 1.64, 95% CI 1.46-1.85) and were less concerned about their health issues (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.18-1.40) were more likely to call the front desk. Only 2.5% (323/13,011) of respondents would have contacted out-of-hours services. Users with longer travel time to the GP office (OR 6.08, 95% CI 3.46-10.66) and with a new health problem (OR 2.71, 95% CI 2.09-3.51) were more likely to choose this option. In addition, 4.7% (609/13,011) of the users would not have sought help if e-consultations had not been available. Younger patients (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.38-3.37) and those with a longer travel time to the GP office (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.27-3.80) or a new health issue (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.43-2.12) had higher odds for not seeking help.

CONCLUSIONS

e-Consultations were often the patients' first choice of access route, and users expected a fast response. e-Consultations were mostly perceived as an alternative to GP appointments or calling the front desk. Patients with lower availability to the GP office had higher odds of using e-consultations as an alternative to out-of-hours service or waiting and not seeking GP care. Guidance for patient use should be developed to ensure appropriate and safe use. Further research should assess the effect of e-consultations on health outcomes and efficiency.

摘要

背景

电子咨询被定义为基于文本的异步消息传递,它改变了患者与全科医生(GP)互动的方式。虽然电子咨询可以改善患者获得全科医疗服务的机会,但人们也对全科医生工作量增加表示担忧。

目的

本研究旨在解决三个研究问题:(1)患者发起电子咨询的目的和期望是什么?(2)如果没有电子咨询,患者会采取什么替代行动?(3)这些替代行动与患者及电子咨询特征有何关联?

方法

通过在Helsenorge上进行的网络调查开展了一项横断面研究。Helsenorge是挪威数字健康服务的国家公民门户,包括与全科医生的电子咨询。2023年1月至2月期间,所有通过Helsenorge发送电子咨询的用户都被邀请参与。该调查涉及用户对电子咨询的期望和体验问题。使用多项逻辑回归分析患者和电子咨询特征与电子咨询替代行动之间的关联。

结果

总体而言,13011名用户回答了调查。发起电子咨询最常见的原因是索要病假证明(4940/13011,38%)。总体而言,68.7%(8802/13011)的受访者期望在24小时内得到回复,17.7%(2310/13011)预计全科医生会要求他们进行体格检查。如果没有电子咨询,45.5%(5917/13011)的受访者会预约全科医生门诊,44.9%(5846/13011)会打电话到前台。期望更快回复(优势比[OR]1.64,95%置信区间1.46 - 1.85)且对自身健康问题不太担心的用户(OR 1.29,95%置信区间1.18 - 1.40)更有可能打电话到前台。只有2.5%(323/13011)的受访者会联系非工作时间服务。前往全科医生办公室路途时间较长的用户(OR 6.08,95%置信区间3.46 - 10.66)以及有新健康问题的用户(OR 2.71,95%置信区间2.09 - 3.51)更有可能选择此选项。此外,如果没有电子咨询,4.7%(609/13011)的用户不会寻求帮助。年轻患者(OR 2.16,95%置信区间1.38 - 3.37)以及前往全科医生办公室路途时间较长的患者(OR 2.19,95%置信区间1.27 - 3.80)或有新健康问题的患者(OR 1.74,95%置信区间1.43 - 2.12)不寻求帮助的几率更高。

结论

电子咨询通常是患者首选的就诊途径,用户期望快速得到回复。电子咨询大多被视为替代全科医生门诊预约或打电话到前台的方式。前往全科医生办公室不太方便的患者更有可能将电子咨询作为非工作时间服务的替代方式,或者选择等待且不寻求全科医疗服务。应制定患者使用指南,以确保合理、安全地使用。进一步的研究应评估电子咨询对健康结果和效率的影响。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验