Khambhati Jay, Sobieszczyk Piotr, Eisenhauer Andrew C, Todoran Thomas M, Kinlay Scott
Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, West Roxbury, MA, United States of America; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2024 Dec 29. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.017.
Older patients may be denied endovascular revascularization of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) for peripheral artery disease (PAD) due to concerns of worse limb outcomes than younger patients.
We assessed adverse outcomes in patients after an index revascularization stratified by age (age < 65, 65-75 years, and > 75 years) from two centers between 2003 and 2011 and followed a median 9 (25 %-75 %: 7, 11) years. Outcomes included major adverse limb events (MALE) or minor repeat revascularization, death, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). We used cause-specific and competing-risks analyses with clustering by patient to determine the hazard ratios (HR), sub-hazard ratios (SHR), 95 % confidence intervals (95%CI) for outcomes according to older age.
There were 253 limbs revascularized in 202 patients with a high use of lipid lowering therapy (91 %) and aspirin anti-platelet therapy (96 %). In oldest age group (>75 years), 71 limbs were revascularized and patients were less likely to be active smokers and had poorer tibial runoff than younger patients. In competing risks multivariable models, patients >75 years old had similar risks over 10 years of MALE or minor revascularization (SHR = 0.92, 95%CI = 0.53, 1.62) and MACCE (SHR = 1.12, 95%CI = 0.58, 2.18) to younger patients. All-cause death was more common in older patients (HR = 1.99, 95%CI = 1.25, 3.17).
After adjusting for the competing risk of death, patients >75 years had similar incidence of adverse limb outcomes and MACCE to younger patients after endovascular revascularization of the femoral artery. Consequently, older patients should be considered for endovascular revascularization when indicated.
由于担心老年患者的肢体预后比年轻患者差,老年患者可能会被拒绝接受针对外周动脉疾病(PAD)的股浅动脉(SFA)血管内血运重建治疗。
我们评估了2003年至2011年间来自两个中心的患者在初次血运重建后按年龄分层(年龄<65岁、65 - 75岁和>75岁)的不良结局,并进行了中位数为9(25% - 75%:7,11)年的随访。结局包括主要不良肢体事件(MALE)或轻微重复血运重建、死亡以及主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)。我们采用特定病因和竞争风险分析,并按患者进行聚类,以确定不同年龄组结局的风险比(HR)、亚风险比(SHR)和95%置信区间(95%CI)。
202例患者的253条肢体接受了血运重建,降脂治疗(91%)和阿司匹林抗血小板治疗(96%)的使用率很高。在年龄最大的组(>75岁)中,71条肢体接受了血运重建,与年轻患者相比,该组患者当前吸烟的可能性较小,胫后血管灌注较差。在竞争风险多变量模型中,>75岁的患者在10年内发生MALE或轻微重复血运重建(SHR = 0.92,95%CI = 0.53,1.62)以及MACCE(SHR = 1.12,95%CI = 0.58,2.18)的风险与年轻患者相似。全因死亡在老年患者中更为常见(HR = 1.99,95%CI = 1.25,3.17)。
在调整死亡的竞争风险后,>年龄75岁的患者在接受股动脉血管内血运重建后,不良肢体结局和MACCE的发生率与年轻患者相似。因此,在有指征时,应考虑对老年患者进行血管内血运重建治疗。