Cagetti Leonel Varela, Gonzague-Casabianca Laurence, Ferré Marjorie, Gilhodes Julia, Lambaudie Eric, Blache Guillaume, Jauffret Camille, Provansal Magalie, Sabatier Renaud, Tallet Agnès
Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Brachytherapy. 2025 Mar-Apr;24(2):248-257. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.11.010. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
To compare the clinical outcomes of two different schedules of modern image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) in patients underwent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) for locally advanced cervical cancer treated (LACC) METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data from medical records of all consecutive patients with histologically proven cervical cancer (FIGO 2018 stage IB-IVA) treated by HDR-BT after CCRT at our institution between 2016 and 2021 were reviewed.
Two hundred and 8 patients with LACC FIGO 2018 stages (IB 20.7%; II 26.5%, III 51%, IVA 1.9%) underwent brachytherapy at our institution. Depending on initial clinical features of disease and the clinical response to CCRT, HDR-BT was delivered with one implant (BT1i) or two implants (BT2i) in 39% and 61% of patients respectively. FIGO stages (≥IIB) were 63% vs. 78% for BT1i and BT2i patient group respectively. Combined brachytherapy technique [endocavitary/interstitial (IC/IS)] was required in 14.8% vs. 68.5% for BT1i and BT2i respectively. With a median follow-up of 32.5 months (95% confidence interval, [29.7-35.8]), local relapse was observed in sixteen patients: 8 patients (3.8%) had local (exclusive) relapse and 8 patients (3.8%) had locally persistent and progressive disease, without significant difference for each BT modality group (p = 0.27), even if BT2i group had more aggressive initial disease. The estimated 3-year disease free survival and overall survival for the entire population was 69% (95% confidence interval, [62-75%]) and 88% (95% confidence interval, [82-92%]) respectively. There was a significant difference in the incidence of global toxicity grade G≥2 in favour to the BT2i group (p = 0.026).
HDR brachytherapy delivered with a long time interval between fractions, two implants, and combined IC/IS brachytherapy is the best way to ensure local control and to perform IGABT with low toxicity, even in advanced stages of disease.
比较两种不同方案的现代图像引导自适应近距离放射治疗(IGABT)在接受同步放化疗(CCRT)和高剂量率(HDR)近距离放射治疗(BT)的局部晚期宫颈癌(LACC)患者中的临床疗效。方法与材料:回顾了2016年至2021年期间在本机构接受CCRT后接受HDR - BT治疗的所有连续组织学确诊宫颈癌(国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)2018分期为IB - IVA期)患者的病历数据。
208例FIGO 2018分期的LACC患者(IB期占20.7%;II期占26.5%,III期占51%,IVA期占1.9%)在本机构接受了近距离放射治疗。根据疾病的初始临床特征和对CCRT的临床反应,分别有39%和61%的患者接受了一次植入(BT1i)或两次植入(BT2i)的HDR - BT。BT1i组和BT2i组的FIGO分期(≥IIB)分别为63%和78%。BT1i组和BT2i组分别有14.8%和68.5%的患者需要联合近距离放射治疗技术[腔内/组织间(IC/IS)]。中位随访32.5个月(95%置信区间,[29.7 - 35.8]),16例患者出现局部复发:8例患者(3.8%)出现局部(仅局部)复发,8例患者(3.8%)出现局部持续和进展性疾病,各BT模式组之间无显著差异(p = 0.27),即使BT2i组初始疾病更具侵袭性。整个队列的估计3年无病生存率和总生存率分别为69%(95%置信区间,[62 - 75%])和88%(95%置信区间,[82 - 92%])。BT2i组在总体毒性≥2级的发生率上有显著差异(p = 0.026)。
分次间间隔时间长、两次植入以及联合IC/IS近距离放射治疗的HDR近距离放射治疗是确保局部控制并以低毒性进行IGABT的最佳方法,即使在疾病晚期也是如此。