Hu Wenjie, Qin Yi, Dong Taoming, Lin Xueying, Chen Yuan, Zhang Wenxiong, Feng Tanggui
Department of Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Jingdezhen, Jingdezhen, China.
Department of thoracic surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
J Cancer. 2025 Jan 1;16(3):735-747. doi: 10.7150/jca.99319. eCollection 2025.
The prevailing belief is that third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (TGET) outperform first-generation EGFR-TKIs (FGET) in managing advanced-stage EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, this standpoint lacks substantiation in evidence-based medicine. Therefore, this meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy and adverse effects (AEs) of these two categories. We searched seven databases for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs), focusing on primary endpoints such as progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and central nervous system PFS (CNS-PFS). Additional factors considered included treatment responses and AEs. We analyzed 15 studies from 6 RCTs on six third-generation TKIs: Osimertinib, Lazertinib, Furmonertinib, Aumolertinib, Naquotinib, and Befotertinib. TGET showed better efficacy in PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.55 [0.41, 0.75]), CNS-PFS (HR: 0.48 [0.35, 0.66]), CNS-objective response rate (CNS-ORR, risk ratio [RR]: 1.40 [1.19, 1.65]), and duration of response (DOR, HR: 0.52 [0.38, 0.72]). Most subgroups confirmed the PFS advantage. With longer survival time, the superiority in PFS, OS, and CNS-PFS of TGETs became more evident. Both groups had similar OS (HR: 0.86), ORR, CNS-DOR, total AEs, and grade 3-5 AEs. However, TGETs had more severe AEs (RR: 1.17 [1.02, 1.35]). Additionally, there were more grade 3-4 cases of diarrhea, decreased platelet count, pulmonary embolism, fatigue, decreased neutrophil count, and rash, and fewer grade 3-4 increases in alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) in the TGET group. The top 5 AEs in the TGET group were diarrhea (36.32%), rash (30.24%), decreased platelet count (29.15%), elevated serum creatinine (23.63%), and decreased white blood cell count (22.02%). Except for Naquotinib, TGETs demonstrate superiority over FGETs in treating EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, showing improved survival and responses. However, the increased incidence of AEs necessitates careful consideration.
目前普遍认为,针对表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)的第三代酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)(TGET)在治疗晚期EGFR突变的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)方面优于第一代EGFR-TKIs(FGET)。然而,这一观点在循证医学中缺乏依据。因此,进行了这项荟萃分析以比较这两类药物的疗效和不良反应(AEs)。我们在七个数据库中检索了相关的随机对照试验(RCTs),重点关注无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和中枢神经系统无进展生存期(CNS-PFS)等主要终点。考虑的其他因素包括治疗反应和AEs。我们分析了来自6项RCTs的15项研究,涉及六种第三代TKIs:奥希替尼、拉泽替尼、伏美替尼、奥莫替尼、纳科替尼和贝福替尼。TGET在PFS(风险比[HR]:0.55[0.41,0.75])、CNS-PFS(HR:0.48[0.35,0.66])、中枢神经系统客观缓解率(CNS-ORR,风险比[RR]:1.40[1.19,1.65])和缓解持续时间(DOR,HR:0.52[0.38,0.72])方面显示出更好的疗效。大多数亚组证实了TGET在PFS方面的优势。随着生存时间延长,TGET在PFS、OS和CNS-PFS方面的优势更加明显。两组的OS(HR:0.86)、ORR、CNS-DOR、总AEs和3-5级AEs相似。然而,TGET的AEs更严重(RR:1.17[1.02,1.35])。此外,TGET组腹泻、血小板计数减少、肺栓塞、疲劳、中性粒细胞计数减少和皮疹的3-4级病例更多,丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)和天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)的3-4级升高病例更少。TGET组前5位的AEs分别为腹泻(36.32%)、皮疹(30.24%)、血小板计数减少(29.15%)、血清肌酐升高(23.63%)和白细胞计数减少(22.02%)。除纳科替尼外,TGET在治疗EGFR突变的局部晚期或转移性NSCLC方面优于FGET,显示出更好的生存和反应。然而,AEs发生率的增加需要仔细考虑。