Kale Yogesh J, Misal Sagar, Dadpe Mahesh, Dahake Prasanna T, Kendre Shrikant B
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Maharashtra Institute of Dental Sciences & Research (MIDSR), Latur, Maharashtra, India.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Nov;17(11):1252-1257. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2755. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the apical microleakage of zinc oxide (ZOE) eugenol and Endoflas as obturating materials using different root canal irrigants in primary teeth.
A total of 80 extracted primary anterior teeth were divided randomly into four groups with different irrigants and obturating materials used. Group I [ZOE + sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl)], group II [ZOE + NaOCI + ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)], group III (Endoflas FS + NaOCI), group IV (Endoflas FS + NaOCI + EDTA). Cleaning and shaping of the root canals were done using specified irrigants, followed by obturation with ZOE eugenol and Endoflas as per the respective groups. Specimens were then immersed in 2% methylene blue dye solution and stored for 24 hours. The specimens were split longitudinally into two halves and observed under a stereomicroscope. Apical microleakage was measured from the apex to the most coronal extent of dye penetration.
The highest dye penetration was recorded for teeth filled with ZOE, group I (ZOE + NaOCl), with mean values of 1.924 ± 0.925. Endoflas group IV (Endoflas + NaOCI + EDTA) showed the lowest dye penetration with mean values of 0.901 ± 0.255. There was a statistically significant difference between the ZOE and Endoflas groups ( < 0.001). The result showed a statistically nonsignificant difference between the two Endoflas groups ( = 1.000). Minimum microleakage was found in group IV (Endoflas + NaOCI + EDTA).
Endoflas FS exhibits less apical microleakage than ZOE eugenol as an obturating material in primary teeth. Hence, Endoflas could be a potential alternative to ZOE eugenol with better sealing ability as an obturating material in primary teeth. Also, the addition of EDTA to irrigation protocol has shown a statistically nonsignificant improvement in microleakage reduction with both obturating materials.
Kale YJ, Misal S, Dadpe M, Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Zinc Oxide Eugenol and Endoflas as Obturating Materials Using Different Root Canal Irrigants in Primary Teeth: An Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(11):1252-1257.
本研究旨在评估和比较氧化锌丁香油酚(ZOE)和Endoflas作为乳牙根管充填材料,在使用不同根管冲洗剂时的根尖微渗漏情况。
共80颗拔除的乳前牙随机分为四组,使用不同的冲洗剂和充填材料。第一组[ZOE + 次氯酸钠(NaOCl)],第二组[ZOE + NaOCl + 乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)],第三组(Endoflas FS + NaOCl),第四组(Endoflas FS + NaOCl + EDTA)。使用特定冲洗剂进行根管清理和成形,然后根据相应分组用ZOE丁香油酚和Endoflas进行充填。接着将标本浸入2%亚甲蓝染液中并保存24小时。将标本纵向劈成两半,在体视显微镜下观察。测量根尖微渗漏从根尖到染料渗透的最冠方范围。
第一组(ZOE + NaOCl),即充填ZOE的牙齿,染料渗透最高,平均值为1.924 ± 0.925。第四组Endoflas(Endoflas + NaOCl + EDTA)染料渗透最低,平均值为0.901 ± 0.255。ZOE组和Endoflas组之间存在统计学显著差异(< 0.001)。结果显示两组Endoflas组之间无统计学显著差异(= 1.000)。第四组(Endoflas + NaOCl + EDTA)微渗漏最小。
作为乳牙充填材料,Endoflas FS的根尖微渗漏比ZOE丁香油酚少。因此,Endoflas作为乳牙充填材料,可能是ZOE丁香油酚的一种潜在替代品,具有更好的封闭能力。此外,在冲洗方案中添加EDTA,对于两种充填材料,在减少微渗漏方面显示出统计学上无显著改善。
Kale YJ, Misal S, Dadpe M, 乳牙中使用不同根管冲洗剂时氧化锌丁香油酚和Endoflas作为充填材料的微渗漏比较评估:一项研究。《国际临床儿科牙科学杂志》2024;17(11):1252 - 1257。