• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

罕见病药物卫生技术评估价值评估框架的制定:来自巴西一项德尔菲研究的见解

Development of a value assessment framework for Health Technology Assessment in rare diseases drugs: insights from a Delphi study in Brazil.

作者信息

Biglia Luiza Vasconcelos, Felippini Arturo, Ribeiro Tatiane Bomfim, Lima Tácio de Mendonça, Aguiar Patricia Melo

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Faculty of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2025 Jan 9;41(1):e6. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324004835.

DOI:10.1017/S0266462324004835
PMID:39783027
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11811954/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to propose and validate a value assessment framework for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) for rare diseases drugs in Brazil.

METHODS

A scoping review was performed to identify criteria used by HTA agencies in countries with public healthcare systems when evaluating orphan drugs. Based on the findings, a criteria framework for rare disease drugs was proposed for Brazil. Content validity was conducted over three rounds using Delphi technique and content validity ratio (CVR) approach was employed to evaluate the ratings from the eighteen stakeholders (experts and patients).

RESULTS

Twenty-nine HTA criteria for rare disease drugs were identified to compose the Brazilian framework. After three Delphi rounds, the final value framework comprised fifteen criteria categorized into four domains: disease-related factors, treatment-related factors, social and political factors, and economic factors. Among the most well-rated criteria by the CVR, considering the relevance attribute, were "relevance of outcomes for a rare disease," "impact on patient's quality of life," "price negotiation," and "adjusted cost-effectiveness threshold." On the other hand, "budget impact threshold," "innovative nature of treatment," and "willingness to accept greater uncertainty in clinical evidence" received negative evaluations and were excluded from the final framework.

CONCLUSIONS

A value assessment framework validated by key stakeholders of rare diseases in Brazil could contribute to improve HTA transparency, decision making, and efficiency of the healthcare system, and inspire the development of a local guidance for rare-disease HTA.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在提出并验证巴西罕见病药物卫生技术评估(HTA)的价值评估框架。

方法

进行了一项范围综述,以确定公共医疗体系国家的HTA机构在评估孤儿药时使用的标准。基于这些发现,为巴西提出了罕见病药物标准框架。采用德尔菲技术进行三轮内容效度评估,并运用内容效度比率(CVR)方法评估18名利益相关者(专家和患者)的评分。

结果

确定了29条罕见病药物HTA标准以构成巴西框架。经过三轮德尔菲法后,最终的价值框架包括15条标准,分为四个领域:疾病相关因素、治疗相关因素、社会和政治因素以及经济因素。在CVR评分最高的标准中,从相关性属性来看,有“罕见病结局的相关性”“对患者生活质量的影响”“价格谈判”以及“调整后的成本效益阈值”。另一方面,“预算影响阈值”“治疗的创新性”以及“愿意接受临床证据中更大的不确定性”得到负面评价,并被排除在最终框架之外。

结论

一个经巴西罕见病关键利益相关者验证的价值评估框架有助于提高HTA的透明度、决策制定以及医疗体系的效率,并激发制定罕见病HTA的本地指南。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ca/11811954/2b1e899f1a44/S0266462324004835_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ca/11811954/2b1e899f1a44/S0266462324004835_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82ca/11811954/2b1e899f1a44/S0266462324004835_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a value assessment framework for Health Technology Assessment in rare diseases drugs: insights from a Delphi study in Brazil.罕见病药物卫生技术评估价值评估框架的制定:来自巴西一项德尔菲研究的见解
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2025 Jan 9;41(1):e6. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324004835.
2
HTA criteria adopted in different models of public healthcare systems for orphan drugs: A scoping review.不同公共医疗体系模型中采用的罕见病药物 HTA 标准:范围综述。
Health Policy. 2024 Jun;144:105080. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105080. Epub 2024 May 6.
3
Systematic review on the evaluation criteria of orphan medicines in Central and Eastern European countries.中东欧国家罕见病药物评估标准的系统评价
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016 Jun 4;11(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0455-6.
4
Dealing with Uncertainty and Accounting for Social Value Judgments in Assessments of Orphan Drugs: Evidence from Four European Countries.处理罕见病药物评估中的不确定性并考虑社会价值判断:来自四个欧洲国家的证据
Value Health. 2017 Jul-Aug;20(7):919-926. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.03.005. Epub 2017 May 3.
5
Methods and criteria for the assessment of orphan drugs: a scoping review.评估孤儿药的方法和标准:范围综述。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2022 Jun 22;38(1):e59. doi: 10.1017/S0266462322000393.
6
Paying for the Orphan Drug System: break or bend? Is it time for a new evaluation system for payers in Europe to take account of new rare disease treatments?支付孤儿药系统费用:是坚持还是妥协?是否到了欧洲的支付方采用新的评估体系来考虑新的罕见病治疗方法的时候了?
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012 Sep 26;7:74. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-7-74.
7
Why do health technology assessment coverage recommendations for the same drugs differ across settings? Applying a mixed methods framework to systematically compare orphan drug decisions in four European countries.为何针对相同药物的卫生技术评估覆盖建议在不同地区存在差异?应用混合方法框架对四个欧洲国家的罕见病药物决策进行系统比较。
Eur J Health Econ. 2017 Jul;18(6):715-730. doi: 10.1007/s10198-016-0823-0. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
8
International experiences in multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) for evaluating orphan drugs: a scoping review.用于评估孤儿药的多标准决策分析(MCDA)的国际经验:一项范围综述。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2019 Aug;19(4):409-420. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2019.1633918. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
9
Issues, Challenges and Opportunities for Economic Evaluations of Orphan Drugs in Rare Diseases: An Umbrella Review.罕见病孤儿药经济学评价的问题、挑战与机遇:伞式综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Jun;42(6):619-631. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01370-2. Epub 2024 Apr 14.
10
HTA programme response to the challenges of dealing with orphan medicinal products: Process evaluation in selected European countries.HTA 项目应对孤儿药挑战的反应:选定欧洲国家的过程评估。
Health Policy. 2019 Feb;123(2):140-151. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.03.009. Epub 2017 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Connecting minds and catalyzing collaboration: the interest groups of health technology assessment international.连接思想,促进合作:国际卫生技术评估兴趣小组
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2025 Jul 7;41(1):e43. doi: 10.1017/S0266462325100287.

本文引用的文献

1
Health technology assessment framework for artificial intelligence-based technologies.人工智能技术的健康技术评估框架。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Nov 21;40(1):e61. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000308.
2
HTA criteria adopted in different models of public healthcare systems for orphan drugs: A scoping review.不同公共医疗体系模型中采用的罕见病药物 HTA 标准:范围综述。
Health Policy. 2024 Jun;144:105080. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105080. Epub 2024 May 6.
3
Development of a Value Assessment Framework for Pediatric Health Technologies Using Multicriteria Decision Analysis: Expanding the Value Lens for Funding Decision Making.
采用多准则决策分析制定儿科健康技术的价值评估框架:为资金决策拓宽价值视角。
Value Health. 2024 Jul;27(7):879-888. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.03.012. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
4
Assessing the Value of Provider-Facing Digital Health Technologies Used in Chronic Disease Management: Toward a Value Framework Based on Multistakeholder Perceptions.评估用于慢性病管理的面向提供者的数字健康技术的价值:基于多利益相关者感知的价值框架。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Jan;44(1):28-41. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231206803. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
5
Health Policies for Rare Disease Patients: A Scoping Review.罕见病患者健康政策:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 17;19(22):15174. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215174.
6
Promoting innovation while controlling cost: The UK's approach to health technology assessment.在控制成本的同时促进创新:英国的卫生技术评估方法。
Health Policy. 2022 Mar;126(3):224-233. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.01.013. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
7
Incorporation of drugs for rare diseases in Brazil: is it possible to have full access to these patients?将罕见病药物纳入巴西医保体系:这些患者能否全面获得这些药物?
Cien Saude Colet. 2021 Nov;26(11):5547-5560. doi: 10.1590/1413-812320212611.26722020. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
8
Transforming uncertainties into legitimate regulation? NICE and CONITEC agencies' decisions on rare diseases.将不确定性转化为合法监管?NICE 和 CONITEC 机构在罕见病方面的决策。
Cien Saude Colet. 2021 Nov;26(11):5533-5546. doi: 10.1590/1413-812320212611.34542020. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
9
Value-based tiered pricing for universal health coverage: an idea worth revisiting.基于价值的全民健康覆盖分层定价:一个值得重新审视的想法。
Gates Open Res. 2020 Apr 24;4:16. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13110.3. eCollection 2020.
10
Challenges in Research and Health Technology Assessment of Rare Disease Technologies: Report of the ISPOR Rare Disease Special Interest Group.罕见病技术的研究和卫生技术评估面临的挑战:ISPOR 罕见病特别兴趣小组的报告。
Value Health. 2018 May;21(5):493-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Apr 11.