Suppr超能文献

痴呆行为和心理症状知识量表土耳其语版(BPSD-T)的效度和信度:护理人员的心理测量学评估

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia Knowledge Scale (BPSD-T): A Psychometric Evaluation Among Caregivers.

作者信息

Uysal Hasan Armağan, Güllüoğlu Halil, Poyraz Turan, Başaran Simay, Var Levent, Eşkut Neslihan

出版信息

Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2024;35(4):295-305. doi: 10.5080/u27614.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to validate the Turkish version of the Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia Knowledge Scale (BPSD-T) among caregivers. The goal was to assess the scale's psychometric properties, ensuring it accurately measures caregivers' knowledge of dementia-related behavioral and psychological symptoms in a Turkish context.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, the data were collected from 212 caregivers providing home-based care to dementia patients across Turkey. Participants completed a 12-item Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD) knowledge questionnaire along with a sociodemographic form. To examine the factor structure of the scale, both exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted. Sample adequacy for EFA was assessed using the Kaiser- Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure and Bartlett's test of sphericity. For CFA, model fit was evaluated using fit indices such as χ2/df, Goodness of Fit Index (GFI), Comparative Fit Index (CFI), Normed Fit Index (NFI), and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA). The internal consistency of the scale was assessed with Cronbach's alpha coefficient.

RESULTS

The findings showed that the BPSD-T has strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.85) and a robust factor structure. Factor loadings ranged from 0.396 to 0.744, supporting the construct validity of the scale. Item-total correlations ranged from 0.437 to 0.711, with the item "BPSD are the major source of caregiving burden" having the highest correlation (r=0.711). The results indicate that the BPSD-T is a reliable instrument for assessing caregivers' knowledge of behavioral and psychological symptoms associated with dementia.

CONCLUSION

The BPSD-T provides an effective means of identifying knowledge gaps among caregivers in Turkey and serves as a valuable tool for developing training programs aimed at improving the management of BPSD. This study contributes to the literature by validating the scale in a non-Western context, suggesting that enhancing caregivers' knowledge of BPSD can have positive impacts on clinical management and patient care. In this regard, the implementation of the BPSD-T may support the more effective management of behavioral and psychological symptoms in dementia patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在验证痴呆症行为和心理症状知识量表土耳其语版(BPSD-T)在护理人员中的有效性。目标是评估该量表的心理测量特性,确保其在土耳其背景下准确测量护理人员对痴呆症相关行为和心理症状的了解。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,数据收集自土耳其各地为痴呆症患者提供居家护理的212名护理人员。参与者完成了一份包含12个条目的痴呆症行为和心理症状(BPSD)知识问卷以及一份社会人口学表格。为了检验该量表的因子结构,进行了探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)。使用凯泽-迈耶-奥尔金(KMO)度量和巴特利特球形检验评估EFA的样本充足性。对于CFA,使用诸如χ2/df、拟合优度指数(GFI)、比较拟合指数(CFI)、规范拟合指数(NFI)和近似均方根误差(RMSEA)等拟合指数评估模型拟合度。用量表的内部一致性系数评估量表的内部一致性。

结果

研究结果表明,BPSD-T具有很强的内部一致性(克朗巴哈α系数=0.85)和稳健的因子结构。因子载荷范围为0.396至0.744,支持该量表的结构效度。项目与总分的相关性范围为0.437至0.711,其中“BPSD是护理负担的主要来源”这一项目的相关性最高(r=0.711)。结果表明,BPSD-T是评估护理人员对痴呆症相关行为和心理症状了解情况的可靠工具。

结论

BPSD-T为识别土耳其护理人员的知识差距提供了一种有效手段,并且是制定旨在改善BPSD管理的培训计划的宝贵工具。本研究通过在非西方背景下验证该量表为文献做出了贡献,表明增强护理人员对BPSD的了解可能对临床管理和患者护理产生积极影响。在这方面,实施BPSD-T可能有助于更有效地管理痴呆症患者的行为和心理症状。

相似文献

5
Development and psychometric testing of the Pediatric Atraumatic Care Attitude Scale (PACAS) in pediatric nurses.
J Pediatr Nurs. 2024 Nov-Dec;79:e31-e37. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2024.09.015. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
6
Adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of the alarm fatigue assessment questionnaire.
Enferm Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2024 Apr-Jun;35(2):114-123. doi: 10.1016/j.enfie.2023.09.001. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
7
Transcultural adaptation and validation of IMPACT-III and IMPACT-III-P in Spanish families: a multicenter study from SEGHNP.
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Aug;183(8):3417-3430. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05575-7. Epub 2024 May 21.
8
The validity and reliability of the type 2 diabetes and health promotion scale Turkish version: a methodological study.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2018 Mar;32(1):417-421. doi: 10.1111/scs.12483. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
9
The Adolescent Insomnia Questionnaire: the Turkish validity and reliability study.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2024 Aug 16;70(7):e20240247. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20240247. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

4
What does the general public understand about prevention and treatment of dementia? A systematic review of population-based surveys.
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 19;13(4):e0196085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196085. eCollection 2018.
5
Japanese-language Dementia Knowledge Assessment Scale: Psychometric performance, and health student and professional understanding.
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Oct;17(10):1746-1751. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12911. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
6
Dementia Knowledge Assessment Scale: Development and Preliminary Psychometric Properties.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Nov;63(11):2375-81. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13707. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
7
Translating Evidence-Based Dementia Caregiving Interventions into Practice: State-of-the-Science and Next Steps.
Gerontologist. 2015 Apr;55(2):210-26. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu123. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
10
Meta-analysis of nonpharmacological interventions for neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia.
Am J Psychiatry. 2012 Sep;169(9):946-53. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.11101529.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验