Gunther Carolyn, Lin Chyongchiou J, Schier Heather, Knopp Miriam, Chang Mei-Wei, Kennel Julie, Sharn Amy R, Westrick Miranda, Ilic Sanja, Breitenstein Susan M, Grimes Joyce, Foster Kyra, Schwierking Sierra, May Leah
Martha S. Pitzer for Women, Children, and Youth, College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Department of Nutrition and Healthcare Management, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Calorina, USA.
Child Obes. 2025 Apr;21(3):282-296. doi: 10.1089/chi.2024.0370. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
There is need to identify evidence-based early childhood obesity prevention programs that are feasible and demonstrate cost-effectiveness for a broader health impact. This scale-out study leveraged community-engaged principles to compare the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of three delivery modes of a childhood obesity prevention family meals program (Simple Suppers) that demonstrated positive impacts on child and caregiver diet/nutritional health-related outcomes in a previous experimental trial tested among elementary-aged children. This three-arm (in-person, online, hybrid) pre-(T0) and post-(T1)-test study included families recruited from Head Start. Forty-five families (45 caregivers; 55 children) completed the study. The program was adapted to families with younger children (3-5 years). During the 8-week program, participants received weekly group education and meals through in-person, online, or hybrid format. Feasibility outcomes were attendance, acceptability (post-test survey; focus groups), fidelity, and cost (food; staff). Participant outcomes were related to diet/nutritional health. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare T0 to T1 differences in participant outcomes across delivery modes. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Cost-effectiveness was calculated as the net-cost of the program by changes in outcomes. Overall attendance was 51.2%, and higher for in-person (72.0%) and hybrid (59.7%). Program satisfaction rate was highest for hybrid (93.0%), as well as program fidelity (96.7%). Focus group results revealed areas of program improvement, behavior change, and program approval. Cost was lowest for hybrid ($17.09/family). Children in the hybrid group had a reduced waist circumference ( = 0.02) versus in-person and online groups. The hybrid mode of Simple Suppers demonstrated the greatest scaling potential for a broader public health impact.