• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

频率标记电生理学所证明的最佳单词阅读率。

Optimal Word Reading Rate as Evidenced by Frequency-tagging Electrophysiology.

作者信息

Marchive Marion, Rossion Bruno, Lochy Aliette

机构信息

University of Luxembourg.

Université de Lorraine.

出版信息

J Cogn Neurosci. 2025 May 1;37(5):988-1008. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02286.

DOI:10.1162/jocn_a_02286
PMID:39785667
Abstract

Fast periodic visual stimulation (FPVS) coupled with EEG has been used for a decade to measure word-selective neural responses in (a)typical adults and developmental readers. Here, we used this FPVS-EEG approach to evaluate suitable and optimal stimulation frequency rates for prelexical and lexical word-selective responses and relate these rates to typical reading speed and interindividual variability in reading performance. EEG was recorded in 41 healthy adults who viewed words inserted periodically (1 Hz) at four different stimulation frequency rates (4 Hz, 6 Hz, 10 Hz, and 20 Hz). At all these stimulation rates but the highest (20 Hz), we found typical left-lateralized, word-selective, occipitotemporal responses, larger for the prelexical (words in nonwords) than lexical (words in pseudowords) contrast. Although significant responses were found at all frequency rates, these responses were negligible at 20 Hz, without any evidence of left lateralization at this frequency. The largest occipitotemporal response was found at a 4 Hz base rate in both hemispheres for the prelexical contrast, with increased left lateralization for the lexical discrimination. Moreover, word-selective responses for this discrimination (lexical), only at 4 Hz, were related to reading speed. The optimal 4 Hz rate finding is in line with the mean reading speed for expert readers as assessed during text reading. Overall, these findings further validate and optimize the FPVS-EEG approach for rapid implicit measurement of word-selective neural responses.

摘要

快速周期性视觉刺激(FPVS)与脑电图(EEG)相结合已被用于测量(非)典型成年人及发展性阅读者的词汇选择性神经反应长达十年。在此,我们使用这种FPVS-EEG方法来评估词前和词汇词选择性反应的合适及最佳刺激频率,并将这些频率与典型阅读速度及阅读表现的个体间差异联系起来。对41名健康成年人进行脑电图记录,他们以四种不同的刺激频率(4Hz、6Hz、10Hz和20Hz)观看以1Hz周期性插入的单词。在除最高频率(20Hz)之外的所有这些刺激频率下,我们发现了典型的左侧化、词汇选择性枕颞叶反应,词前(非单词中的单词)对比比词汇(假单词中的单词)对比的反应更大。尽管在所有频率下都发现了显著反应,但这些反应在20Hz时可忽略不计,在该频率下没有任何左侧化的证据。在两个半球中,词前对比在4Hz基础频率下发现了最大的枕颞叶反应,词汇辨别时左侧化增加。此外,仅在4Hz时,这种辨别(词汇)的词汇选择性反应与阅读速度相关。最佳的4Hz频率发现与文本阅读期间评估的专家阅读者的平均阅读速度一致。总体而言,这些发现进一步验证并优化了FPVS-EEG方法,用于快速隐式测量词汇选择性神经反应。

相似文献

1
Optimal Word Reading Rate as Evidenced by Frequency-tagging Electrophysiology.频率标记电生理学所证明的最佳单词阅读率。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2025 May 1;37(5):988-1008. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02286.
2
A robust index of lexical representation in the left occipito-temporal cortex as evidenced by EEG responses to fast periodic visual stimulation.脑电图对快速周期性视觉刺激的反应证明,左侧枕颞叶皮质存在强大的词汇表征指标。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Jan;66:18-31. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.007. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
3
Linguistic and attentional factors - Not statistical regularities - Contribute to word-selective neural responses with FPVS-oddball paradigms.语言和注意力因素而非统计规律对 FPVS-oddball 范式中的单词选择神经反应有贡献。
Cortex. 2024 Apr;173:339-354. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.01.007. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
4
Impaired neural discrimination of regular words from pseudowords in dyslexic adults as revealed by fast periodic visual stimulation.快速周期性视觉刺激揭示了阅读障碍成年人对真词和假词的神经辨别能力受损。
Neuropsychologia. 2025 Jun 6;212:109137. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2025.109137. Epub 2025 Apr 5.
5
Face-selective responses in combined EEG/MEG recordings with fast periodic visual stimulation (FPVS).利用快速周期视觉刺激(FPVS)进行的组合 EEG/MEG 记录中的面孔选择性反应。
Neuroimage. 2021 Nov 15;242:118460. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118460. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
6
The odd one out - Orthographic oddball processing in children with poor versus typical reading skills in a fast periodic visual stimulation EEG paradigm.与众不同者——在快速周期性视觉刺激脑电图范式下,阅读能力较差与正常儿童的正字法异常球处理。
Cortex. 2024 Mar;172:185-203. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.12.010. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
7
Selective visual representation of letters and words in the left ventral occipito-temporal cortex with intracerebral recordings.大脑皮层内记录显示左侧腹侧枕颞叶皮层对字母和单词的选择性视觉呈现。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Aug 7;115(32):E7595-E7604. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1718987115. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
8
Left-lateralized N170 effects of visual expertise in reading: evidence from Japanese syllabic and logographic scripts.阅读中视觉专长的左侧化N170效应:来自日语音节文字和表意文字的证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Oct;20(10):1878-91. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20125.
9
Neural Correlates of Word Recognition: A Systematic Comparison of Natural Reading and Rapid Serial Visual Presentation.单词识别的神经关联:自然阅读与快速序列视觉呈现的系统比较
J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Sep;28(9):1374-91. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00977. Epub 2016 May 11.
10
Impact of Learning to Read in a Mixed Approach on Neural Tuning to Words in Beginning Readers.采用混合方法学习阅读对初读者单词神经调谐的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 23;10:3043. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03043. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Word-selective EEG/MEG responses in the English language obtained with fast periodic visual stimulation (FPVS).通过快速周期性视觉刺激(FPVS)获得的英语中词选择性脑电图/脑磁图反应。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Jan 3;3. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00414. eCollection 2025.
2
Visual Stimulation Under 4 Hz, Not at 10 Hz, Generates the Highest-Amplitude Frequency-Tagged Responses of the Human Brain: Understanding the Effect of Stimulation Frequency.4赫兹而非10赫兹的视觉刺激能产生人脑最高振幅的频率标记反应:理解刺激频率的影响。
eNeuro. 2025 Jun 17;12(6). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0426-24.2025. Print 2025 Jun.