Oh Geon, Lee Jeongshim, Kim Hunjung, Cheon Wonjoong, Shin Dong-Seok, Seo Jaehyeon, Sung Jiwon, Shin Dongho, Yoon Myonggeun, Chung Jin-Beom, Lee Boram
Department of Bioengineering, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Med Phys. 2025 Apr;52(4):2533-2550. doi: 10.1002/mp.17614. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy using Iridium-192 as a radiation source is widely employed in cancer treatment to deliver concentrated radiation doses while minimizing normal tissue exposure. In this treatment, the precision with which the sealed radioisotope source is delivered significantly impacts clinical outcomes.
This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of a new four-dimensional (4D) in vivo source tracking and treatment verification system for HDR brachytherapy using a patient-specific approach.
A hardware system was developed for the experiments, featuring a high-resolution compact gamma camera with a redesigned diverging collimator, enhanced detector, and precision control system. The collimator was redesigned to improve spatial resolution by reducing the hole size and increasing the hole array, while reducing the pixel size of the detector and increasing the number of pixels. The performance was evaluated using Monte Carlo simulations, which demonstrated significant improvements in spatial resolution. Experiments were conducted in a controlled setup using a phantom to simulate clinical conditions. The phantom was positioned at various distances from the gamma camera (327.30, 377.30, and 427.30 mm) and imaged at multiple angles. The accuracy of the system was tested in four different cases: three with fixed distances and one employing a multi-focusing method. The multi-focusing method allows the gamma camera to adjust its focus based on the anatomical characteristics of individual patients, thereby enhancing source-tracking accuracy. The performance of the system was evaluated under these four different scenarios. The Euclidean distance and three-dimensional gamma analysis were used to evaluate tracking accuracy and dose distribution.
The redesigned collimator demonstrated significant improvements (compared to the previous design) in the spatial resolution of the gamma camera, showing 34.21% and 23.46% enhancements in the horizontal and vertical profiles, respectively. These improvements in gamma camera resolution are crucial for enhancing the tracking system's accuracy. The experimental results demonstrated varying degrees of accuracy across different cases, reflecting the performance of the system under different conditions. The average Euclidean distance errors were Case 1 (327.30 mm): 1.358 mm; Case 2 (377.30 mm): 1.731 mm; Case 3 (427.30 mm): 1.973 mm; and Case 4 (multi-focusing): 1.527 mm. The gamma pass rates for the four cases were:- Case 1: 86.39%; Case 2: 75.28%; Case 3: 72.22%; and Case 4: 81.67% (1 mm/1%). For the 2 mm/2% criterion, the gamma pass rates were 97.11, 94.72, 92.38, and 96.78% for Cases 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Case 4 (multi-focusing) showed an improvement over Case 3, with a 22.6% reduction in the average Euclidean distance error and a 13.1% increase in the gamma pass rate (1 mm/1%).
These results demonstrate that the new 4D in vivo source tracking and treatment verification system for HDR brachytherapy is feasible and has potential clinical benefits.
使用铱 - 192作为辐射源的高剂量率(HDR)近距离放射治疗在癌症治疗中被广泛应用,以提供集中的辐射剂量,同时将正常组织暴露降至最低。在这种治疗中,密封放射性同位素源的递送精度对临床结果有显著影响。
本研究旨在评估一种新的四维(4D)体内源跟踪和治疗验证系统用于HDR近距离放射治疗的可行性,该系统采用针对患者的方法。
开发了一个用于实验的硬件系统,其特点是配备了高分辨率紧凑型伽马相机,该相机具有重新设计的发散准直器、增强型探测器和精密控制系统。准直器经过重新设计,通过减小孔尺寸和增加孔阵列来提高空间分辨率,同时减小探测器的像素尺寸并增加像素数量。使用蒙特卡罗模拟对性能进行评估,结果表明空间分辨率有显著提高。在使用体模模拟临床条件的受控设置中进行实验。体模放置在距伽马相机不同距离处(327.30、377.30和427.30毫米),并在多个角度成像。在四种不同情况下测试系统的准确性:三种情况为固定距离,一种采用多聚焦方法。多聚焦方法允许伽马相机根据个体患者的解剖特征调整其焦点,从而提高源跟踪准确性。在这四种不同场景下评估系统的性能。使用欧几里得距离和三维伽马分析来评估跟踪准确性和剂量分布。
重新设计的准直器在伽马相机的空间分辨率方面(与先前设计相比)有显著提高,水平和垂直剖面分别提高了34.21%和23.46%。伽马相机分辨率的这些提高对于提高跟踪系统的准确性至关重要。实验结果表明不同情况下的准确性程度不同,反映了系统在不同条件下的性能。平均欧几里得距离误差分别为:情况1(327.30毫米):1.358毫米;情况2(377.30毫米):1.731毫米;情况3(427.30毫米):1.973毫米;情况4(多聚焦):1.527毫米。四种情况的伽马通过率分别为:情况1:86.39%;情况2:75.28%;情况3:72.22%;情况4:81.67%(1毫米/1%)。对于2毫米/2%标准,情况1、2、3和4的伽马通过率分别为97.11%、94.72%、92.38%和96.78%。情况4(多聚焦)比情况3有所改进,平均欧几里得距离误差降低了22.6%,伽马通过率(1毫米/1%)提高了13.1%。
这些结果表明,用于HDR近距离放射治疗的新的4D体内源跟踪和治疗验证系统是可行的,并且具有潜在的临床益处。