Suppr超能文献

新辅助化疗后病理完全缓解对胃癌生存的影响:一项倾向评分匹配分析

Impact of pathological complete response on survival in gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a propensity score matching analysis.

作者信息

Chen Yonghe, He Jiasheng, Zheng Jiabo, Lin Yi, Wang Huashe, Lian Lei, Peng Junsheng

机构信息

Department of General Surgery (Gastrointestinal Surgery, Unit 1), The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 26 Yuancun Erheng Road, Guangzhou, 510655, China.

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, China.

出版信息

BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Jan 9;25(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03594-8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The survival benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients are inconsistent. This study aims to investigate how different tumor regression grades (TRG) influence the survival gains associated with NAC treatment.

METHODS

This study compared the treatment outcomes of patients who underwent CSC (neoadjuvant chemotherapy - surgery - adjuvant chemotherapy) with those receiving traditional SC (surgery - adjuvant chemotherapy) treatment. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to minimize potential biases arising from differences in baseline characteristics and intervention factors between the treatment groups. After PSM, the CSC cohort was stratified according to TRGs, and their survival outcomes were compared to assess the impact of TRGs on survival gains associated with NAC.

RESULTS

Before PSM, a total of 506 patients were enrolled: 291 in the CSC cohort and 215 in the SC cohort. The CSC cohort had a lower 3-year survival rate (3Y-SR) than the SC cohort (64.6% vs. 76%). In the CSC cohort, patients who achieved pathological complete response (pCR, 12.1%, 26/215) demonstrated significantly improved 3Y-SR (95.5%). After PSM, 110 patients were matched in each cohort. The 3Y-SR was similar between the CSC cohort (68.3%) and the SC cohort (63.6%). In the CSC cohort, 12.7% (14/110) of patients achieved pCR. Subgroup analysis revealed that the pCR subgroup (3Y-SR 100%) was the only subgroup within the CSC cohort that maintained significantly improved survival compared to the SC cohort. Better tumor differentiation was the only pre-treatment factor significantly associated with achieving pCR (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective study, LAGC patients who achieved pCR after NAC demonstrated significantly better survival outcomes compared to other response groups. The study found tumor differentiation was a potential predictor of pCR.

摘要

目的

新辅助化疗(NAC)对局部晚期胃癌(LAGC)患者的生存获益并不一致。本研究旨在探讨不同的肿瘤退缩分级(TRG)如何影响与NAC治疗相关的生存获益。

方法

本研究比较了接受CSC(新辅助化疗 - 手术 - 辅助化疗)的患者与接受传统SC(手术 - 辅助化疗)治疗的患者的治疗结果。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来尽量减少治疗组之间基线特征和干预因素差异引起的潜在偏差。PSM后,根据TRG对CSC队列进行分层,并比较其生存结果,以评估TRG对与NAC相关的生存获益的影响。

结果

PSM前,共纳入506例患者:CSC队列291例,SC队列215例。CSC队列的3年生存率(3Y-SR)低于SC队列(64.6%对76%)。在CSC队列中,达到病理完全缓解(pCR,12.1%,26/215)的患者3Y-SR显著提高(95.5%)。PSM后,每个队列匹配了110例患者。CSC队列(68.3%)和SC队列(63.6%)的3Y-SR相似。在CSC队列中,12.7%(14/110)的患者达到pCR。亚组分析显示,pCR亚组(3Y-SR 100%)是CSC队列中唯一与SC队列相比生存仍显著改善的亚组。较好的肿瘤分化是与达到pCR显著相关的唯一治疗前因素(p < 0.001)。

结论

在这项回顾性研究中,NAC后达到pCR的LAGC患者与其他反应组相比生存结果显著更好。研究发现肿瘤分化是pCR的一个潜在预测因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca5c/11720295/b3359811ff6e/12876_2025_3594_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验