Suppr超能文献

AO/OTA骨折分类是否决定不稳定型桡骨远端骨折手术治疗的麻醉方式?——一项对127例采用全身麻醉与区域麻醉治疗的患者的回顾性队列研究。

Does the AO/OTA fracture classification dictate the anesthesia modality for the surgical management of unstable distal radius fractures? - A retrospective cohort study in 127 patients managed by general vs. regional anesthesia.

作者信息

Halvachizadeh Sascha, Dreifuss Merav, Rauer Thomas, Kaiser Anne, Ubmann Dirk, Pape Hans-Christoph, Allemann Florin

机构信息

Department of Trauma, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich, 8091, Switzerland.

University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 71, Zürich, 8006, Switzerland.

出版信息

Patient Saf Surg. 2025 Jan 9;19(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13037-024-00423-x.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Regional anesthesia increases in popularity in orthopaedic surgery. It is usually applied in elective surgeries of the extremities. The aim of this study was to assess indication of the use of general anesthesia in the surgical treatment of distal radius fractures.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgical fixation for distal radius fractures between January 1st, 2020, and December 31st, 2021, were included. Exclusion criteria encompassed incomplete 12-month follow-up, transferred or multiply injured patients, those with prior upper limb fractures, or admission for revision surgeries. Patients were categorized by anesthesia type: GA or plexus block anesthesia (PA). Primary outcomes comprised tourniquet utilization and duration of surgery, while secondary outcomes encompassed complications (e.g., complex regional pain syndrome [CRPS], local wound infection, implant removal necessity) and range of motion at three, six, and twelve months post-surgery. Fractures were classified using the AO/OTA system.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 127 patients, with 90 (70.9%) in Group GA and 37 (29.1%) in Group PA. Mean patient age was 56.95 (± 18.59) years, with comparable demographics and fracture distribution between groups. Group GA exhibited higher tourniquet usage (96.7% vs. 83.8%, p = 0.029) and longer surgery durations (85.17 ± 37.8 min vs. 65.0 ± 23.0 min, p = 0.013). Complication rates were comparable, Group GA 12.2% versus Group PA 5.4% p = 0.407, OR 2.44; 95%CI 0.51 to 11.58, p = 0.343). Short-term functional outcomes favored Group PA at three months (e.g., Pronation: 81.1° ± 13.6 vs. 74.3° ± 17.5, p = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

Solely classifying distal radius fractures does not dictate anesthesia choice. Complexity of injury, anticipated surgery duration, less use of tourniquet, and rehabilitation duration may guide regional anesthesia utilization over GA in distal radius fracture fixation.

摘要

引言

区域麻醉在骨科手术中的应用越来越广泛。它通常用于四肢的择期手术。本研究的目的是评估在桡骨远端骨折手术治疗中使用全身麻醉的指征。

方法

纳入2020年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间接受桡骨远端骨折手术固定的患者。排除标准包括随访不足12个月、转诊或多处受伤的患者、既往有上肢骨折的患者或因翻修手术入院的患者。患者按麻醉类型分类:全身麻醉(GA)或臂丛神经阻滞麻醉(PA)。主要结局包括止血带使用情况和手术持续时间,次要结局包括并发症(如复杂性区域疼痛综合征[CRPS]、局部伤口感染、是否需要取出植入物)以及术后3个月、6个月和12个月时的活动范围。骨折采用AO/OTA系统分类。

结果

本研究共纳入127例患者,其中GA组90例(70.9%),PA组37例(29.1%)。患者平均年龄为56.95(±18.59)岁,两组患者的人口统计学特征和骨折分布具有可比性。GA组的止血带使用率更高(96.7%对83.8%,p=0.029),手术持续时间更长(85.17±37.8分钟对65.0±23.0分钟,p=0.013)。并发症发生率相当,GA组为12.2%,PA组为5.4%,p=0.407,OR 2.44;95%CI为0.51至11.58,p=0.343)。短期功能结局在术后3个月时PA组更优(例如,旋前:81.1°±13.6对74.3°±17.5,p=0.046)。

结论

仅根据桡骨远端骨折的分类并不能决定麻醉方式的选择。损伤的复杂性、预期的手术持续时间、较少使用止血带以及康复时间可能会指导在桡骨远端骨折固定中优先使用区域麻醉而非全身麻醉。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5f9/11716251/c87c5fe867ab/13037_2024_423_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验