Breton Zélia, Stern Emilie, Pinault Mathilde, Lhuillery Delphine, Petit Erick, Panel Pierre, Alexaline Maïa
Lyv Healthcare, Nantes, France.
Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Inserm, 94805, Villejuif, France.
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Feb 28;9:e58262. doi: 10.2196/58262.
After experiencing symptoms for an average of 7 years before diagnosis, patients with endometriosis are usually left with more questions than answers about managing their symptoms in the absence of a cure. To help women with endometriosis after their diagnosis, we developed a digital program combining user research, evidence-based medicine, and clinical expertise. Structured around cognitive behavioral therapy and the quality of life metrics from the Endometriosis Health Profile score, the program was designed to guide participants for 3 months.
This cohort study was designed to measure the impact of a digital health program on the symptoms and quality of life levels of women with endometriosis.
In total, 63% (92/146) of the participants were included in the pilot study, recruited either free of charge through employer health insurance or via individual direct access. A control group of 404 women with endometriosis who did not follow the program, recruited through social media and mailing campaigns, was sampled (n=149, 36.9%) according to initial pain levels to ensure a similar pain profile to participants. Questionnaires assessing quality of life and symptom levels were emailed to both groups at baseline and 3 months. Descriptive statistics and statistical tests were used to analyze intragroup and intergroup differences, with Cohen d measuring effect sizes for significant results.
Over 3 months, participants showed substantial improvements in global symptom burden, general pain level, anxiety, depression, dysmenorrhea, dysuria, chronic fatigue, neuropathic pain, and endo belly. These improvements were significantly different from the control group for global symptom burden (participants: mean -0.7, SD 1.6; controls: mean -0.3, SD 1.3; P=.048; small effect size), anxiety (participants: mean -1.1, SD 2.8; controls: mean 0.2, SD 2.5; P<.001; medium effect size), depression (participants: mean -0.9, SD 2.5; controls: mean 0.0, SD 3.1; P=.04; small effect size), neuropathic pain (participants: mean -1.0, SD 2.7; controls: mean -0.1, SD 2.6; P=.004; small effect size), and endo belly (participants: mean -0.9, SD 2.5; controls: mean -0.3, SD 2.4; P=.03; small effect size). Participants' quality of life improved between baseline and 3 months and significantly differed from that of the control group for the core part of the Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (participants: mean -5.9, SD 21.0; controls: mean 1.0, SD 14.8; P=.03; small effect size) and the EQ-5D (participants: mean 0.1, SD 0.1; controls: mean -0.0, SD 0.1; P=.001; medium effect size). Perceived knowledge of endometriosis was significantly greater at 3 months among participants compared to the control group (P<.001).
This study's results suggest that a digital health program providing medical and scientific information about endometriosis and multidisciplinary self-management tools may be useful to reduce global symptom burden, anxiety, depression, neuropathic pain, and endo belly while improving knowledge on endometriosis and quality of life among participants.
子宫内膜异位症患者在确诊前平均经历7年的症状后,在无法治愈的情况下,对于如何控制症状往往疑问多于答案。为了帮助确诊后的子宫内膜异位症女性,我们开发了一个数字项目,该项目结合了用户研究、循证医学和临床专业知识。该项目围绕认知行为疗法和子宫内膜异位症健康状况评分中的生活质量指标构建,旨在指导参与者为期3个月。
本队列研究旨在衡量一个数字健康项目对子宫内膜异位症女性症状和生活质量水平的影响。
共有63%(92/146)的参与者被纳入试点研究,她们通过雇主医疗保险免费招募或通过个人直接报名参与。通过社交媒体和邮件活动招募了404名未参与该项目的子宫内膜异位症女性作为对照组,并根据初始疼痛水平进行抽样(n = 149,36.9%),以确保与参与者的疼痛情况相似。在基线和3个月时,通过电子邮件向两组发送评估生活质量和症状水平的问卷。使用描述性统计和统计检验来分析组内和组间差异,采用Cohen d来衡量显著结果的效应大小。
在3个月的时间里,参与者在总体症状负担、一般疼痛水平、焦虑、抑郁、痛经、排尿困难、慢性疲劳、神经性疼痛和子宫内膜异位症相关腹部不适等方面有显著改善。这些改善在总体症状负担(参与者:均值 -0.7,标准差1.6;对照组:均值 -0.3,标准差1.3;P = 0.048;小效应量)、焦虑(参与者:均值 -1.1,标准差2.8;对照组:均值0.2,标准差2.5;P < 0.001;中等效应量)、抑郁(参与者:均值 -0.9,标准差2.5;对照组:均值0.0,标准差3.1;P = 0.04;小效应量)、神经性疼痛(参与者:均值 -1.0,标准差2.7;对照组:均值 -0.1,标准差2.6;P = 0.004;小效应量)和子宫内膜异位症相关腹部不适(参与者:均值 -0.9,标准差2.5;对照组:均值 -0.3,标准差2.4;P = 0.03;小效应量)方面与对照组有显著差异。参与者的生活质量在基线和3个月之间有所改善,在子宫内膜异位症健康状况量表 -5的核心部分(参与者:均值 -5.9,标准差21.0;对照组:均值1.0,标准差14.8;P = 0.03;小效应量)和EQ - 5D(参与者:均值0.1,标准差0.1;对照组:均值 -0.0,标准差0.1;P = 0.001;中等效应量)方面与对照组有显著差异。与对照组相比,参与者在3个月时对子宫内膜异位症的认知明显更高(P < 0.001)。
本研究结果表明,一个提供有关子宫内膜异位症医学和科学信息以及多学科自我管理工具的数字健康项目,可能有助于减轻总体症状负担、焦虑、抑郁、神经性疼痛和子宫内膜异位症相关腹部不适,同时提高参与者对子宫内膜异位症的认知和生活质量。