Isaac Sarah Mohsen, Dawes Mark, Howell Emily Ruth, Oladipo Antonia Francis
Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, 123 Metro Blvd, Nutley, NJ, 07110, United States, 1 7248419463.
Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Jan 6;12:e53057. doi: 10.2196/53057.
Transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) individuals are increasingly intentionally becoming pregnant to raise children, and hospital websites should reflect these trends. For prospective TGNB parents, a hospital website is the only way they can assess their safety from discrimination while receiving perinatal care. Cisnormativity enforced by communication gaps between medical institutions and TGNB patients can and has caused delays in receiving urgent care during their pregnancy.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the current prevalence of gender-inclusive terminology among labor and delivery services in the New York tristate area.
The labor and delivery web pages of 189 hospitals from New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut were examined for gender-inclusive language. "Fully inclusive" websites explicitly acknowledged lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and asexual plus other gender- and sexual-oriented (LGBTQIA+) parents, "inclusive" websites did not use gendered terminology for parents, and "noninclusive" websites used gendered terms at least once in the text reviewed. The hospitals' web pages were further stratified by Healthcare Equality Index scores and population classifications defined by the 2013 National Center for Health Statistics Urban-Rural classification given to the county that each hospital was located in.
Of the 300 hospital websites reviewed, only 189 websites met the criteria for inclusion. Overall, only 6.3% (n=12) of labor and delivery web pages were "inclusive" or "fully inclusive." No geographic areas (P=.61) or Healthcare Equality Index scores (P=.81) were associated with inclusive or fully inclusive language.
Hospitals need to use inclusive language to help TGNB people identify hospitals where their existence and needs are acknowledged and thus feel more comfortable in their transition to parenthood.
跨性别者和非二元性别者(TGNB)越来越多地有意怀孕以抚养孩子,医院网站应反映这些趋势。对于准TGNB父母来说,医院网站是他们在接受围产期护理时评估自身免受歧视安全状况的唯一途径。医疗机构与TGNB患者之间的沟通差距所强化的顺性别规范,可能且已经导致他们在孕期接受紧急护理时出现延误。
本研究的目的是评估纽约三州地区分娩服务中性别包容性术语的当前流行情况。
对纽约、新泽西和康涅狄格州189家医院的分娩网页进行性别包容性语言检查。“完全包容”的网站明确承认女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿、双性人、无性恋者以及其他性别和性取向(LGBTQIA+)的父母,“包容”的网站在提及父母时不使用性别化术语,“非包容”的网站在所审查的文本中至少使用一次性别化术语。医院网页还根据医疗平等指数得分以及各医院所在县2013年国家卫生统计中心城乡分类所定义的人口分类进行了进一步分层。
在所审查的300个医院网站中,只有189个网站符合纳入标准。总体而言,分娩网页中只有6.3%(n = 12)是“包容”或“完全包容”的。没有地理区域(P = 0.61)或医疗平等指数得分(P = 0.81)与包容或完全包容的语言相关。
医院需要使用包容性语言,以帮助TGNB人群识别那些承认他们的存在和需求的医院,从而在他们过渡到为人父母的过程中感到更自在。