Paranna Sujatha, Thosar Nilima, Kanitkar Aditi
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Sangli; Sharad Pawar Dental College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University), Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra, India, Phone: +91 7259215556, e-mail:
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University), Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra, India, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3339-781X.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2024 Sep 1;25(9):891-903. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3759.
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of build orientation on the mechanical and physical properties of additively manufactured resin using digital light processing (DLP).
The properties of 3D-printed materials are influenced by various factors, including the type of additive manufacturing (AM) system and build orientation. There is a scarcity of literature on the effect of build orientation on the mechanical and physical properties of additively manufactured resins using DLP technology in dentistry.
This study followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO. The formulated population, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) question was "What is the effect of build orientation on the mechanical and physical properties of additively manufactured resins produced using DLP in dentistry." The search strategy used three main electronic databases and an additional manual search was done until February 2024. All the studies that evaluated the correlation of build orientation and the properties of printed resin using DLP were included. Two different analysis was used for and studies to assess the risk of bias.
On search 237 studies were yielded for systematic review, out of which 13 studies were included for the systematic review evaluation. On evaluation and reviewing the included studies, though the build orientation angle influenced the properties of printed resins the results obtained were varied as 90° angle had increased compressive strength, low surface roughness, and best accuracy. The 0° angle had better wear resistance, tensile strength, and high flexural strength. There was no influence of build orientation on microhardness, shear bond strength, gloss and color difference. The studies on denture base showed that 45° build angle showed the truest with best accuracy.
The build orientation angle effects on both the mechanical and physical properties of the additively manufactured resin but varies with each property. The build orientation can be chosen based on the type of properties to be achieved based on the treatment modality.
Based on the systematic review results the specific build orientation angle should be used during fabrication of any denture designs, crowns, and bridges as it is correlated with the properties to be achieved by particular designs. How to cite this article: Paranna S, Thosar N, Kanitkar A. Effect of Build Orientation on Mechanical and Physical Properties of Additively Manufactured Resins Using Digital Light Processing Technology in Dentistry: A Systematic Review. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(9):891-903.
本系统评价旨在评估成型方向对采用数字光处理(DLP)增材制造树脂的机械性能和物理性能的影响。
3D打印材料的性能受多种因素影响,包括增材制造(AM)系统的类型和成型方向。关于成型方向对牙科中使用DLP技术增材制造树脂的机械性能和物理性能影响的文献较少。
本研究遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,并在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)进行了注册。制定的人群、干预措施、对照、结局(PICO)问题为“成型方向对牙科中使用DLP生产的增材制造树脂的机械性能和物理性能有何影响”。检索策略使用了三个主要电子数据库,并进行了额外的手工检索,直至2024年2月。纳入所有评估成型方向与使用DLP的打印树脂性能相关性的研究。对 和 研究采用两种不同的分析方法来评估偏倚风险。
在检索过程中,共获得237项用于系统评价的研究,其中13项研究纳入系统评价评估。在对纳入研究进行评估和审查时,尽管成型方向角度影响打印树脂的性能,但获得的结果各不相同,因为90°角可提高抗压强度、降低表面粗糙度并具有最佳精度。0°角具有更好的耐磨性、拉伸强度和高弯曲强度。成型方向对显微硬度、剪切粘结强度、光泽度和色差没有影响。关于义齿基托的研究表明,45°成型角显示出最真实且精度最佳。
成型方向角度对增材制造树脂的机械性能和物理性能均有影响,但因性能不同而有所差异。可根据治疗方式要实现的性能类型来选择成型方向。
基于系统评价结果,在制作任何义齿设计、牙冠和牙桥时应使用特定的成型方向角度,因为它与特定设计要实现的性能相关。如何引用本文:Paranna S, Thosar N, Kanitkar A. 成型方向对牙科中使用数字光处理技术增材制造树脂的机械性能和物理性能的影响:一项系统评价。《当代牙科实践杂志》2024;25(9):891 - 903。