• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公共卫生团队参与当地酒精场所许可的创新与多样性:ExILEnS研究的定性访谈结果

Innovation and diversity in public health team engagement in local alcohol premises licensing: qualitative interview findings from the ExILEnS study.

作者信息

Purves Richard, Mohan Andrea, O'Donnell Rachel, Egan Matt, Maani Nason, Fitzgerald Niamh

机构信息

Institute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK.

School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jan;13(2):1-19. doi: 10.3310/RNVD1542.

DOI:10.3310/RNVD1542
PMID:39791531
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence suggests that controls on the physical and temporal availability of alcohol can reduce alcohol-related harms. Public health teams in England and Scotland have in recent years been given a statutory role in licensing systems through which premises are granted permits to sell alcohol. The Exploring the Impact of alcohol premises Licensing in England and Scotland study examined public health team efforts to engage in alcohol licensing from 2012 to 2019.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to describe the range of public health team practice in engaging with alcohol licensing across England and Scotland, with a particular focus on unusual or innovative practices.

METHODS

Two sets of interviews were conducted with 20 public health teams in England and Scotland who were actively engaged in alcohol premises licensing. Firstly, representatives of each public health team with experience of licensing activity took part in structured face-to-face or telephone interviews ( = 41) and provided documentation to identify how and when their team engaged with alcohol premises licensing. Secondly, members of public health teams took part in in-depth one-to-one interviews ( = 28) which focused on individual roles and responsibilities. Relevant public health team activity was analysed quantitatively within 19 activities in 6 categories using the 'Public Health engagement In Alcohol Licensing' measure, as well as qualitatively using NVivo (QSR International, Melbourne, Australia). Innovative practices were identified using the highest Public Health engagement In Alcohol Licensing scores for specific activity types across single or multiple 6-month periods.

FINDINGS

Within each of the six activity categories, a range of practices were observed. More unusual practices included having a dedicated post to work full-time on alcohol licensing; developing a standardised reviewer tool allowing the team to respond to applications and provide the most relevant evidence in a consistent and systematic way; committing to additional scrutiny of occasional licences or temporary event notices; maintaining a detailed database recording applications made, whether the public health team decided to object and the outcome of the licensing board's decision; engaging with applicants prior to them submitting an application; visiting proposed/current licensed premises to gather bespoke data; leading the writing of local licensing policy; and working closely with licensing standards officers.

CONCLUSIONS

Across six categories of public health team activity relating to the local alcohol premises licensing system, public health team practices varied, and some public health teams stood out as engaging in more innovative or intensive activities. The identified examples will be of value in informing public health team practice in what remains a relatively new area of work for many, despite limitations in the system. The inclusion of examples from both England and Scotland and from many public health teams will facilitate cross-fertilisation of ideas and practice across public health teams.

FUNDING

This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme as award number 15/129/11.

摘要

背景

有证据表明,对酒精的供应时间和场所进行管控可减少与酒精相关的危害。近年来,英格兰和苏格兰的公共卫生团队在酒类销售许可系统中被赋予了法定职责,通过该系统,场所可获得销售酒精的许可。“探索英格兰和苏格兰酒类销售许可的影响”研究考察了2012年至2019年公共卫生团队在酒类销售许可方面所做的努力。

目的

我们旨在描述英格兰和苏格兰各地公共卫生团队在参与酒类销售许可方面的实践范围,特别关注不同寻常或创新的做法。

方法

对英格兰和苏格兰20个积极参与酒类销售许可工作的公共卫生团队进行了两轮访谈。首先,每个有酒类销售许可活动经验的公共卫生团队的代表参加了结构化的面对面或电话访谈(n = 41),并提供文件以确定其团队如何以及何时参与酒类销售许可工作。其次,公共卫生团队的成员参加了深入的一对一访谈(n = 28),重点是个人的角色和职责。使用“公共卫生参与酒类销售许可”指标对六类19项活动中的相关公共卫生团队活动进行了定量分析,并使用NVivo(QSR国际公司,澳大利亚墨尔本)进行了定性分析。通过在单个或多个6个月期间特定活动类型的最高“公共卫生参与酒类销售许可”得分来确定创新做法。

结果

在六个活动类别中的每一类中,都观察到了一系列做法。更不同寻常的做法包括设立一个专门职位全职从事酒类销售许可工作;开发标准化的审核工具,使团队能够以一致和系统的方式回应申请并提供最相关的证据;承诺对临时许可证或临时活动通知进行额外审查;维护一个详细的数据库,记录收到的申请、公共卫生团队是否决定反对以及许可委员会的决定结果;在申请人提交申请之前与其接触;访问拟议的/现有的许可场所以收集定制数据;牵头撰写当地的许可政策;以及与许可标准官员密切合作。

结论

在与当地酒类销售许可系统相关的六类公共卫生团队活动中,公共卫生团队的实践各不相同,一些公共卫生团队在参与更具创新性或密集性的活动方面表现突出。尽管该系统存在局限性,但所确定的例子对于为许多人来说仍是相对较新的工作领域的公共卫生团队实践具有参考价值。纳入来自英格兰和苏格兰以及多个公共卫生团队的例子将促进公共卫生团队之间思想和实践的交叉融合。

资金来源

本文介绍了由国家卫生与保健研究机构(NIHR)公共卫生研究计划资助的独立研究,资助编号为15/129/11。

相似文献

1
Innovation and diversity in public health team engagement in local alcohol premises licensing: qualitative interview findings from the ExILEnS study.公共卫生团队参与当地酒精场所许可的创新与多样性:ExILEnS研究的定性访谈结果
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jan;13(2):1-19. doi: 10.3310/RNVD1542.
2
Public health engagement in alcohol licensing in England and Scotland: the ExILEnS mixed-method, natural experiment evaluation.英格兰和苏格兰公共卫生部门在酒精许可证发放方面的参与:ExILEnS混合方法自然实验评估
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Feb;13(2):1-84. doi: 10.3310/FSRT4135.
3
Factors influencing public health engagement in alcohol licensing in England and Scotland including legal and structural differences: comparative interview analysis.影响英格兰和苏格兰酒精许可中公众健康参与度的因素,包括法律和结构差异:比较访谈分析
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Feb;13(2):1-42. doi: 10.3310/BGTR4277.
4
Exploring the impact of public health teams on alcohol premises licensing in England and Scotland (ExILEnS): procotol for a mixed methods natural experiment evaluation.探索公共卫生团队对英格兰和苏格兰酒类许可的影响(ExILEnS):一项混合方法自然实验评估的方案。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 6;18(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0573-z.
5
Measuring How Public Health Stakeholders Seek to Influence Alcohol Premises Licensing in England and Scotland: The Public Health Engagement In Alcohol Licensing (PHIAL) Measure.测量英国和苏格兰公共卫生利益相关者试图影响酒类经营许可证的方式:公共卫生参与酒类许可证(PHIAL)措施。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2023 Mar;84(2):318-329. doi: 10.15288/jsad.22-00020. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
6
Democracy and power in alcohol premises licensing: A qualitative interview study of the Scottish public health objective.酒类销售场所许可中的民主与权力:苏格兰公共卫生目标的定性访谈研究。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Jul;37(5):607-615. doi: 10.1111/dar.12819. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
7
Impact of public health team engagement in alcohol licensing on health and crime outcomes in England and Scotland: A comparative timeseries study between 2012 and 2019.英国公共卫生团队参与酒精许可对健康和犯罪结果的影响:2012年至2019年的比较时间序列研究。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Jun 30;20:100450. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100450. eCollection 2022 Sep.
8
Processes, practices and influence: a mixed methods study of public health contributions to alcohol licensing in local government.过程、实践和影响:公共卫生对地方政府酒类许可贡献的混合方法研究。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 18;18(1):1385. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6306-8.
9
Exploring the implementation of public involvement in local alcohol availability policy: the case of alcohol licensing decision-making in England.探索公众参与地方酒精供应政策的实施情况:以英格兰的酒精许可证决策为例。
Addiction. 2022 Apr;117(4):1163-1172. doi: 10.1111/add.15699. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
10
An 'alcohol health champions' intervention to reduce alcohol harm in local communities: a mixed-methods evaluation of a natural experiment.一项“酒精健康卫士”干预措施,以减少当地社区的酒精危害:一项自然实验的混合方法评估。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Sep;12(9):1-135. doi: 10.3310/HTMN2101.