Bischoff Caleb J, Rucinski Kylee, Hoskins Wayne, Haase Douglas R, Bellamy Jaime L
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO; and.
Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO.
J Orthop Trauma. 2025 May 1;39(5):207-210. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002960.
The 22-modifier in the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) system indicates increased surgical procedure complexity, aiming to secure greater reimbursement for surgeons. This study investigated the 22-modifier on reimbursement amounts after acetabular fracture fixation.
Retrospective cohort study.
Academic Level I Trauma Center.
Included were patients with third-party reimbursement for acute acetabular fracture (AO/OTA 62A-C) fixation through an open approach from 2005 to 2021 as identified using CPT codes 27226, 27227, and 27228.
Chart review identified procedures where the 22-modifier for obesity or fracture complexity was applied. A cohort without the 22-modifier matched by diagnosis, primary CPT code, and insurance carrier was made for comparison. The primary outcome measure was the difference in financial reimbursement when the 22-modifier was used. Secondary outcomes were the difference in billed charges and operative time.
A total of 785 cases were initially identified with 747 meeting the inclusion criteria, and 73 having the 22-modifier applied. After removing surgeries that did not receive compensation from their insurance, 52 of these patients were compared with 52 matched cases without a 22-modifier. The 22-modifier group and the nonmodifier group had no significant difference in reimbursed amounts ($4112.71 USD vs. $3851.00, P = 0.644). However, patients in the 22-modifier group had significantly greater billed charges ($8007.35 vs. $7120.94 USD; P = 0.0096), longer operative times (301.7 vs. 240.2 minutes, P < 0.001), and greater body mass index (43.1 vs. 29.3 kg/m 2 ; P < 0.001).
Despite increased complexity and greater billed charges, the use of a 22-modifier in acetabular fracture cases did not result in improved collected reimbursements, and reimbursement is equal to when the 22-modifier is not used. Policymakers and insurers should revise reimbursement structures to better align reimbursements for acetabular fixation with surgical complexity.
Economic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
现行程序术语(CPT)系统中的22修饰符表明手术程序复杂性增加,旨在为外科医生争取更高的报销费用。本研究调查了髋臼骨折固定术后使用22修饰符对报销金额的影响。
回顾性队列研究。
一级学术创伤中心。
纳入2005年至2021年期间通过开放手术治疗急性髋臼骨折(AO/OTA 62A-C)且有第三方报销的患者,使用CPT编码27226、27227和27228进行识别。
通过病历审查确定应用了肥胖或骨折复杂性22修饰符的手术。构建一个在诊断、主要CPT编码和保险公司方面匹配的未使用22修饰符的队列进行比较。主要结局指标是使用22修饰符时财务报销的差异。次要结局指标是计费费用和手术时间的差异。
最初共识别出785例病例,其中747例符合纳入标准,73例应用了22修饰符。在剔除未获得保险赔偿的手术病例后,将其中52例患者与52例匹配的未使用22修饰符的病例进行比较。22修饰符组和未修饰符组的报销金额无显著差异(4112.71美元对3851.00美元,P = 0.644)。然而,22修饰符组患者的计费费用显著更高(8007.35美元对7120.94美元;P = 0.0096),手术时间更长(301.7分钟对240.2分钟,P < 0.001),体重指数更高(43.1对29.3 kg/m²;P < 0.001)。
尽管髋臼骨折病例使用22修饰符后复杂性增加且计费费用更高,但并未导致报销金额提高,报销情况与未使用22修饰符时相同。政策制定者和保险公司应修订报销结构,使髋臼固定术的报销与手术复杂性更好地匹配。
经济证据四级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。