Suppr超能文献

修饰符-22对髋臼骨折固定术后报销的影响。

Impact of Modifier-22 on Reimbursement Following Acetabular Fracture Fixation.

作者信息

Bischoff Caleb J, Rucinski Kylee, Hoskins Wayne, Haase Douglas R, Bellamy Jaime L

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO; and.

Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO.

出版信息

J Orthop Trauma. 2025 May 1;39(5):207-210. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002960.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The 22-modifier in the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) system indicates increased surgical procedure complexity, aiming to secure greater reimbursement for surgeons. This study investigated the 22-modifier on reimbursement amounts after acetabular fracture fixation.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic Level I Trauma Center.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Included were patients with third-party reimbursement for acute acetabular fracture (AO/OTA 62A-C) fixation through an open approach from 2005 to 2021 as identified using CPT codes 27226, 27227, and 27228.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

Chart review identified procedures where the 22-modifier for obesity or fracture complexity was applied. A cohort without the 22-modifier matched by diagnosis, primary CPT code, and insurance carrier was made for comparison. The primary outcome measure was the difference in financial reimbursement when the 22-modifier was used. Secondary outcomes were the difference in billed charges and operative time.

RESULTS

A total of 785 cases were initially identified with 747 meeting the inclusion criteria, and 73 having the 22-modifier applied. After removing surgeries that did not receive compensation from their insurance, 52 of these patients were compared with 52 matched cases without a 22-modifier. The 22-modifier group and the nonmodifier group had no significant difference in reimbursed amounts ($4112.71 USD vs. $3851.00, P = 0.644). However, patients in the 22-modifier group had significantly greater billed charges ($8007.35 vs. $7120.94 USD; P = 0.0096), longer operative times (301.7 vs. 240.2 minutes, P < 0.001), and greater body mass index (43.1 vs. 29.3 kg/m 2 ; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite increased complexity and greater billed charges, the use of a 22-modifier in acetabular fracture cases did not result in improved collected reimbursements, and reimbursement is equal to when the 22-modifier is not used. Policymakers and insurers should revise reimbursement structures to better align reimbursements for acetabular fixation with surgical complexity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Economic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

目的

现行程序术语(CPT)系统中的22修饰符表明手术程序复杂性增加,旨在为外科医生争取更高的报销费用。本研究调查了髋臼骨折固定术后使用22修饰符对报销金额的影响。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

一级学术创伤中心。

患者选择标准

纳入2005年至2021年期间通过开放手术治疗急性髋臼骨折(AO/OTA 62A-C)且有第三方报销的患者,使用CPT编码27226、27227和27228进行识别。

结局指标及比较

通过病历审查确定应用了肥胖或骨折复杂性22修饰符的手术。构建一个在诊断、主要CPT编码和保险公司方面匹配的未使用22修饰符的队列进行比较。主要结局指标是使用22修饰符时财务报销的差异。次要结局指标是计费费用和手术时间的差异。

结果

最初共识别出785例病例,其中747例符合纳入标准,73例应用了22修饰符。在剔除未获得保险赔偿的手术病例后,将其中52例患者与52例匹配的未使用22修饰符的病例进行比较。22修饰符组和未修饰符组的报销金额无显著差异(4112.71美元对3851.00美元,P = 0.644)。然而,22修饰符组患者的计费费用显著更高(8007.35美元对7120.94美元;P = 0.0096),手术时间更长(301.7分钟对240.2分钟,P < 0.001),体重指数更高(43.1对29.3 kg/m²;P < 0.001)。

结论

尽管髋臼骨折病例使用22修饰符后复杂性增加且计费费用更高,但并未导致报销金额提高,报销情况与未使用22修饰符时相同。政策制定者和保险公司应修订报销结构,使髋臼固定术的报销与手术复杂性更好地匹配。

证据水平

经济证据四级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验