Lindee M Susan
Department of the History and Sociology of Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
J Hist Biol. 2024 Dec;57(4):581-602. doi: 10.1007/s10739-024-09801-8. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
This paper explores the control of visiting "foreign scientists" at the Charles Darwin Research Station (CDRS) after it was established in the Galápagos Islands in 1959. Scholarly accounts of the creation of the Galápagos National Park and of the field station have emphasized their place in an international "land grab," as leading scientists and conservationists sought to control nature in places around the world that seemed less "civilized" to European thinkers. The actual administrative labor in the early years at this scientific field station, however, in practice struggled to control people widely taken to represent "civilization" in its highest form-European and American scientists. At the research station, European and American (but not Ecuadorian) scientists were the focus of a delicate choreography of discipline and acquiescence, as scientists were courted and refused, welcomed and limited, chastised and supported. Meanwhile CDRS fund-raising appeals promised that the station would control island residents, fishing crews, and invasive species. Such appeals did not mention controlling elite field scientists. Existing historiography has stressed how Western scientists were privileged actors in non-Western nature reserves and parks, their privileges coming at the expense of local communities. But scientists too faced new (quietly implemented) constraints as post-war conservation programs developed, and achieving their compliance with these new rules involved a process I call here "civilizing" elites.
本文探讨了1959年在加拉帕戈斯群岛设立的查尔斯·达尔文研究站(CDRS)对来访“外国科学家”的管控情况。关于加拉帕戈斯国家公园和该野外工作站创建的学术记录强调了它们在一场国际“土地抢夺”中的地位,因为顶尖科学家和自然资源保护主义者试图在欧洲思想家看来不那么“文明”的世界各地控制自然。然而,在这个科学野外工作站早期的实际管理工作中,却难以管控那些被广泛视为最高形式“文明”代表的人——欧美科学家。在研究站,欧美(而非厄瓜多尔)科学家是一套微妙的纪律与默许编排的焦点,科学家们时而被拉拢、时而被拒绝,时而受到欢迎、时而受到限制,时而遭到斥责、时而得到支持。与此同时,CDRS的筹款呼吁承诺该研究站将管控岛上居民、渔民和入侵物种。此类呼吁并未提及对精英野外科学家的管控。现有史学著作强调了西方科学家在非西方自然保护区和公园中是享有特权的行为者,他们的特权是以牺牲当地社区为代价的。但随着战后保护计划的发展,科学家们也面临着新的(悄然实施的)限制,而要让他们遵守这些新规定涉及一个我在此称之为“教化”精英的过程。