Fu Zhendong, Qin Jianwei, Zheng Kailian, Liu Xinyu, Shi Xiaohan, Wang Huan, Zhu Lingyu, Gao Suizhi, Wu Cheng, Yin Xiaoyi, Shi Meilong, Kang Xiaochao, Kang Yining, Guo Shiwei, Jing Wei, Jin Gang
Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Changhai Hospital Affiliated to Navy Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China; Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Lanzhou, China.
Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Lanzhou, China.
Surgery. 2025 Apr;180:109045. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.109045. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
Modern pancreatic surgery has gradually changed with the introduction of neoadjuvant therapy. For patients with pancreatic cancer involving peripancreatic visceral arteries who have received neoadjuvant therapy, periarterial divestment has gradually gained popularity, which represents an alternative to arterial resection. There is ongoing debate about whether this approach achieves curative tumor resection comparable to that of arterial resection, and the differences in terms of postoperative complications and oncologic outcomes between the 2 surgical procedures.
We retrospectively analyzed the perioperative and survival outcomes of locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients with celiac axis invasion who underwent distal pancreatectomy in our center from December 2016 to March 2023.
Ninety-five patients underwent neoadjuvant therapy as a priority after diagnosis, among whom 42.1% (n = 40) underwent distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis periarterial divestment, whereas 57.9% (n = 55) underwent distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection. Distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis periarterial divestment showed lower rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula, intraabdominal infection, and postoperative hepatic ischemia compared with distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection, with no significant differences in R0 resection rate, postoperative tumor recurrence, and survival. Furthermore, 46 patients diagnosed with locally advanced pancreatic cancer involving the celiac axis underwent upfront surgery of distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection without neoadjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy patients exhibited significant advantages in terms of tumor pathologic outcomes and survival compared with those undergoing upfront surgery of distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection.
After neoadjuvant therapy, distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis periarterial divestment in locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients with celiac axis invasion is deemed safe and feasible on the basis of adequate imaging evaluation combined with intraoperative judgment of the surgeons. This technique is recommended to be performed at high-volume pancreatic centers by experienced surgeons.
随着新辅助治疗的引入,现代胰腺手术已逐渐发生变化。对于接受新辅助治疗的累及胰周内脏动脉的胰腺癌患者,动脉周围剥离术逐渐受到青睐,它是动脉切除的一种替代方法。对于这种方法是否能实现与动脉切除相当的根治性肿瘤切除,以及两种手术方式在术后并发症和肿瘤学结局方面的差异,目前仍存在争议。
我们回顾性分析了2016年12月至2023年3月在本中心接受胰体尾切除术的伴有腹腔干侵犯的局部进展期胰腺癌患者的围手术期和生存结局。
95例患者在诊断后优先接受新辅助治疗,其中42.1%(n = 40)接受了腹腔干动脉周围剥离的胰体尾切除术,而57.9%(n = 55)接受了腹腔干整块切除的胰体尾切除术。与腹腔干整块切除的胰体尾切除术相比,腹腔干动脉周围剥离的胰体尾切除术术后胰瘘、腹腔感染和术后肝缺血的发生率较低,R0切除率、术后肿瘤复发和生存率无显著差异。此外,46例诊断为累及腹腔干的局部进展期胰腺癌患者未接受新辅助治疗,直接进行了腹腔干整块切除的胰体尾切除术。与直接进行腹腔干整块切除的胰体尾切除术的患者相比,新辅助治疗患者在肿瘤病理结局和生存方面表现出显著优势。
在新辅助治疗后,对于伴有腹腔干侵犯的局部进展期胰腺癌患者,在充分的影像学评估结合外科医生术中判断的基础上,进行腹腔干动脉周围剥离的胰体尾切除术被认为是安全可行的。建议由经验丰富的外科医生在大型胰腺中心进行这项技术操作。