Ryan Nicholas P, Catroppa Cathy, Botchway Edith, Sood Nikita Tuli, Crossley Louise, Crowe Louise, Hearps Stephen, Anderson Vicki
School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Brain & Mind Research, Clinical Sciences Theme, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Brain & Mind Research, Clinical Sciences Theme, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
J Affect Disord. 2025 Apr 1;374:238-246. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.01.023. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
Despite a well-documented association between childhood traumatic brain injury and elevated risk for internalizing and externalizing behavior problems, the mechanisms through which family functioning contributes to individual variation in these behavioral outcomes remains poorly understood. This prospective cohort study aimed to assess the respective contribution of family functioning and child emotion regulation (ER) to post-injury behavior problems at 1-year follow-up, with a specific focus on evaluating the role of ER problems in mediating the effects of familial affective responsiveness and communication on child behavioral outcomes.
The study included 129 participants, comprising 86 children with medically confirmed mild-to-severe TBI, identified from consecutive hospital admissions, and 43 typically developing (TD) control children, of similar age and sex. Participants ranged in age from 6 to 15 years (mean age = 11.2 years). Parents completed validated assessments of post-acute family functioning and child emotion regulation problems at 6 months post-injury, as well as measures of child behavior problems at 1-year post-injury.
Although group differences in internalizing behaviors did not reach statistical significance, the TBI group exhibited significantly higher overall externalizing symptoms and was significantly more likely to display clinically elevated symptoms than TD controls at 1-year post-injury. Compared to TD controls, the TBI group displayed significantly greater ER problems, which mediated the effects of lower familial affective responsiveness and communication on child behavior problems 1-year-post-injury.
Evidence for these robust, prospective associations suggests that child emotion regulation problems play a key role in mediating the effect of post-acute family functioning on long-term behavior problems in children with TBI. Early assessment and screening for relevant risk factors may help identify those children and families who could benefit from therapeutic interventions designed to address emotional dysregulation and mitigate risk for post-injury behavioral problems. Importantly, these findings underscore the value of adopting family-centred care approaches in rehabilitation, where involving families in therapeutic processes and addressing family dynamics may enhance child emotion regulation and improve long-term behavioral outcomes.
尽管童年创伤性脑损伤与内化和外化行为问题风险升高之间的关联已有充分记录,但家庭功能导致这些行为结果个体差异的机制仍知之甚少。这项前瞻性队列研究旨在评估家庭功能和儿童情绪调节(ER)对伤后1年行为问题的各自贡献,特别关注评估ER问题在介导家庭情感反应性和沟通对儿童行为结果影响方面的作用。
该研究纳入了129名参与者,包括86名经医学确诊为轻度至重度创伤性脑损伤的儿童(从连续住院患者中识别)以及43名年龄和性别相仿的典型发育(TD)对照儿童。参与者年龄在6至15岁之间(平均年龄 = 11.2岁)。父母在伤后6个月完成了对急性后期家庭功能和儿童情绪调节问题的有效评估,以及伤后1年儿童行为问题的测量。
尽管内化行为的组间差异未达到统计学显著性,但创伤性脑损伤组在伤后1年表现出明显更高的总体外化症状,且比TD对照组更有可能表现出临床升高的症状。与TD对照组相比,创伤性脑损伤组表现出明显更多的ER问题,这些问题介导了较低的家庭情感反应性和沟通对伤后1年儿童行为问题的影响。
这些有力的前瞻性关联证据表明,儿童情绪调节问题在介导急性后期家庭功能对创伤性脑损伤儿童长期行为问题的影响方面起关键作用。对相关风险因素进行早期评估和筛查可能有助于识别那些可从旨在解决情绪失调和降低伤后行为问题风险的治疗性干预中受益的儿童和家庭。重要的是,这些发现强调了在康复中采用以家庭为中心的护理方法的价值,让家庭参与治疗过程并解决家庭动态问题可能会增强儿童情绪调节并改善长期行为结果。