Fahrmann Johannes F, Yip-Schneider Michele, Vykoukal Jody, Spencer Rachelle, Dennison Jennifer B, Do Kim-Anh, Long James P, Maitra Anirban, Zhang Jianjun, Schmidt C Max, Hanash Samir, Irajizad Ehsan
Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Cancer Lett. 2025 Mar 1;612:217450. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2025.217450. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
In the current study, we assessed whether repeated measurements of a panel of protein biomarkers with relevance to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) improves lead time performance for earlier detection over a single timepoint measurement. Specifically, CA125, CEA, LRG1, REG3A, THBS2, TIMP1, TNRFSF1A as well as CA19-9 were assayed in serially collected pre-diagnostic plasma from 242 PDAC cases and 242 age- and sex-matched non-case control participants in the PLCO cohort. We compared performance estimates of a parametric empirical Bayes (PEB) algorithm, which incorporates participant biomarker history, to that of a single-threshold (ST) method. We demonstrated improvements in AUC estimates (2-13 %) for all biomarkers when considering the PEB approach compared to ST. For CA19-9, the PEB yielded an AUC of 0.88 when at least one repeat measurement was within 3 years of clinical diagnosis. At a specificity of 98.5 %, the PEB identified 15 of the 41 PDAC cases and signaled positive at an average lead-time of 1.09 years whereas the ST approach captured 11 of the 41 PDAC cases with an average positive signal at 0.48 years. Among CA19-9 low individuals, a PEB algorithm based on repeat measurements of TIMP1 yielded an additional 14 % sensitivity at 98.5 % specificity. An adaptive algorithm that considers repeated CA19-9 measurements improves sensitivity and lead-time detection of PDAC compared to a single-threshold method. Additional protein biomarkers may improve sensitivity for earlier detection of PDAC among cases with low CA19-9.
在本研究中,我们评估了对一组与胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)相关的蛋白质生物标志物进行重复测量,相较于单次时间点测量,是否能改善早期检测的提前期表现。具体而言,对PLCO队列中242例PDAC病例和242名年龄及性别匹配的非病例对照参与者的系列采集的诊断前血浆进行了CA125、CEA、LRG1、REG3A、THBS2、TIMP1、TNFSF1A以及CA19-9的检测。我们将纳入参与者生物标志物历史的参数经验贝叶斯(PEB)算法的性能估计与单阈值(ST)方法的性能估计进行了比较。我们证明,与ST方法相比,采用PEB方法时所有生物标志物的AUC估计值均有改善(提高了2%-13%)。对于CA19-9,当至少有一次重复测量在临床诊断前3年内时,PEB得出的AUC为0.88。在特异性为98.5%时,PEB识别出41例PDAC病例中的15例,平均提前期为1.09年发出阳性信号,而ST方法在41例PDAC病例中捕获了11例,平均阳性信号出现时间为0.48年。在CA19-9水平较低的个体中,基于TIMP1重复测量的PEB算法在特异性为98.5%时额外提高了14%的灵敏度。与单阈值方法相比,考虑重复CA19-9测量的自适应算法提高了PDAC的灵敏度和提前期检测能力。其他蛋白质生物标志物可能会提高CA19-9水平较低的病例中PDAC早期检测的灵敏度。