Liu Xiaoyi, Wang Ke, Gou Xinyi, Lian Jianxiu, Zhang Yang, Hong Nan, Wang Jianliu, Zhou Rong, Cheng Jin
Department of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Philips (China), Beijing, China.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Jan 11. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04776-w.
Correctly classifying uterine fibroids is essential for treatment planning. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy and reliability of the FIGO classification system in categorizing uterine fibroids via organ-axial T2WI and to further investigate the factors associated with uterine compression.
A total of 130 patients with ultrasound-confirmed fibroids were prospectively enrolled between March 2023 and May 2024. These patients underwent MR examinations, including body-axial T2W (sagittal and axial) and organ-axial T2W (high resolution with oblique coronal and double oblique axial). For postprocessing, the interobserver agreements between two radiologists and the interagreements between two MR examinations and operational descriptions were evaluated via kappa statistics. The accuracy of axial and organ-axial T2W assessments in the FIGO classification of uterine fibroids was compared when surgical outcomes were used as the gold standard. The Kruskal‒Wallis test was used to compare the differences in cavity deformation across various FIGO classifications. Spearman's rank correlation test was used to analyze the correlation between the FIGO classification and the parameters of uterine cavity deformation.
In total, 170 fibroids from 130 patients were included. Compared with body-axial T2WI, organ-axial T2WI showed better interobserver agreement and greater interagreements with operational descriptions, with kappa values of 0.877 (P = 0.04) and 0.932 (P = 0.037), respectively. The accuracy of the organ-axial T2WI assessment in determining the FIGO classification of uterine fibroids was greater than that of the body-axial T2WI assessment, with an accuracy of 92.9% (P < 0.01). Thirty-two (38.1%) fibroids showed cavity deformation according to organ-axial T2WI, including fibroids with FIGO types 0-7 and 2-5. Among these factors, the size of the fibroids (S), base width (B), depth of compression (D), D/B, D/S, and compression angle (A) significantly differed among the different FIGO types of fibroids (P < 0.05). Compression angle exhibited a linear correlation with the FIGO type (P < 0.001).
Compared with body-axial T2WI, organ-axial T2WI provides greater accuracy on the basis of the FIGO classification, which is more consistent with surgical outcomes. Given the excellent reliability and accuracy of the preoperative FIGO classification, organ-axial T2WI can contribute to treatment planning.
正确分类子宫肌瘤对于治疗方案的制定至关重要。本研究的目的是评估国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分类系统通过器官轴位T2WI对子宫肌瘤进行分类的准确性和可靠性,并进一步研究与子宫受压相关的因素。
2023年3月至2024年5月期间,前瞻性纳入了130例经超声确诊为子宫肌瘤的患者。这些患者接受了磁共振成像(MR)检查,包括体轴位T2W(矢状位和轴位)和器官轴位T2W(高分辨率斜冠状位和双斜轴位)。对于后处理,通过kappa统计评估两名放射科医生之间的观察者间一致性以及两次MR检查和操作描述之间的一致性。以手术结果作为金标准,比较轴位和器官轴位T2W评估在子宫肌瘤FIGO分类中的准确性。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验比较不同FIGO分类中宫腔变形的差异。使用Spearman等级相关检验分析FIGO分类与宫腔变形参数之间的相关性。
总共纳入了130例患者的170个子宫肌瘤。与体轴位T2WI相比,器官轴位T2WI显示出更好的观察者间一致性以及与操作描述更高的一致性,kappa值分别为0.877(P = 0.04)和0.932(P = 0.037)。器官轴位T2WI评估在确定子宫肌瘤FIGO分类方面的准确性高于体轴位T2WI评估,准确性为92.9%(P < 0.01)。根据器官轴位T2WI,32个(38.1%)子宫肌瘤显示出宫腔变形,包括FIGO类型0-7和2-5的肌瘤。在这些因素中,不同FIGO类型的子宫肌瘤在肌瘤大小(S)、基底宽度(B)、受压深度(D)、D/B、D/S和受压角度(A)方面存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。受压角度与FIGO类型呈线性相关(P < 0.001)。
与体轴位T2WI相比,器官轴位T2WI在FIGO分类的基础上提供了更高的准确性,这与手术结果更一致。鉴于术前FIGO分类具有出色的可靠性和准确性,器官轴位T2WI有助于制定治疗方案。