Ostoich Peter V
Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Dec 30;26(1):257. doi: 10.3390/ijms26010257.
Classical radiation biology as we understand it clearly identifies genomic DNA as the primary target of ionizing radiation. The evidence appears rock-solid: ionizing radiation typically induces DSBs with a yield of ~30 per cell per Gy, and unrepaired DSBs are a very cytotoxic lesion. We know very well the kinetics of induction and repair of different types of DNA damage in different organisms and cell lines. And yet, higher organisms differ in their radiation sensitivity-humans can be unpredictably radiosensitive during radiotherapy; this can be due to genetic defects (e.g., ataxia telangiectasia (AT), Fanconi anemia, Nijmegen breakage syndrome (NBS), and the xeroderma pigmentosum spectrum, among others) but most often is unexplained. Among other mammals, goats () appear to be very radiosensitive (LD = 2.4 Gy), while Mongolian gerbils () are radioresistant and withstand quadruple that dose (LD = 10 Gy). Primary radiation lethality in mammals is due most often to hematopoietic insufficiency, which is, in the words of Dr. Theodor Fliedner, one of the pioneers of radiation hematology, "a disturbance in cellular kinetics". And yet, what makes one cell type, or one particular organism, more sensitive to ionizing radiation? The origins of radiosensitivity go above and beyond the empirical evidence and models of DNA damage and repair-as scientists, we must consider other phenomena: the radiation-induced bystander effect (RIBE), abscopal effects, and, of course, genomic instability and immunomodulation. It seems that radiosensitivity is not entirely determined by the mathematics of DNA damage and repair, and it is conceivable that radiation biology may benefit from an informed enquiry into physiology and organism-level signaling affecting radiation responses. The current article is a review of several key aspects of radiosensitivity beyond DNA damage induction and repair; it presents evidence supporting new potential venues of research for radiation biologists.
我们所理解的经典辐射生物学明确将基因组DNA确定为电离辐射的主要靶标。证据似乎坚如磐石:电离辐射通常以每戈瑞(Gy)每个细胞约30个的产率诱导双链断裂(DSB),未修复的DSB是一种非常具有细胞毒性的损伤。我们非常清楚不同生物体和细胞系中不同类型DNA损伤的诱导和修复动力学。然而,高等生物在辐射敏感性方面存在差异——人类在放射治疗期间可能具有不可预测的放射敏感性;这可能是由于遗传缺陷(例如,共济失调毛细血管扩张症(AT)、范可尼贫血、尼曼-匹克氏病(NBS)以及着色性干皮病谱系等),但大多数情况下原因不明。在其他哺乳动物中,山羊似乎对辐射非常敏感(半数致死剂量(LD)= 2.4 Gy),而蒙古沙鼠具有抗辐射能力,能承受四倍于此的剂量(LD = 10 Gy)。哺乳动物中的原发性辐射致死最常见的原因是造血功能不全,用辐射血液学的先驱之一西奥多·弗莱德纳博士的话说,这是“细胞动力学的紊乱”。然而,是什么使得一种细胞类型或一种特定生物体对电离辐射更敏感呢?放射敏感性的根源超越了DNA损伤和修复的经验证据及模型——作为科学家,我们必须考虑其他现象:辐射诱导的旁观者效应(RIBE)、远隔效应,当然还有基因组不稳定性和免疫调节。似乎放射敏感性并非完全由DNA损伤和修复的数学原理决定,可以想象辐射生物学可能会受益于对影响辐射反应的生理学和生物体水平信号传导进行明智的探究。本文是对放射敏感性超出DNA损伤诱导和修复的几个关键方面的综述;它提供了支持辐射生物学家新的潜在研究方向的证据。