Tauber Nikolas, Hilmer Lisbeth, Dannehl Dominik, Fick Franziska, Hemptenmacher Franziska, Krawczyk Natalia, Meyer-Lehnert Thomas, Milewski Kay, Princk Henriette, Hartkopf Andreas, Rody Achim, Banys-Paluchowski Maggie
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.
Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of Tuebingen, 72016 Tuebingen, Germany.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 5;17(1):145. doi: 10.3390/cancers17010145.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: This single-center analysis evaluated the number of potential candidates for endocrine-based oral maintenance therapy in a real-world setting, focusing on three therapeutic agents, namely, olaparib, abemaciclib, and ribociclib, for patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative early breast cancer.
All breast cancer cases from the past 10 years ( = 3230) that underwent treatment at the certified Breast Cancer Center of the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck Campus, were analyzed.
Of a total of 2038 patients with HR+ HER2- eBC, 685 patients (33.6%) qualified for one or more of the three agents-olaparib, abemaciclib, and ribociclib. Of these 685 patients, 523 patients (76.4%) had node-positive and 162 (23.6%) node-negative disease. Moreover, 368 patients (18.1% of a total of 2038 patients with HR+ HER2- eBC) were eligible exclusively for ribociclib, including all node-negative patients. A total of 141 patients (6.9%) met the criteria for all three agents. In contrast, 1353 patients (66.4%) had no indication for combined endocrine therapy.
To our knowledge, this is the largest analysis addressing all three therapeutic strategies for combined endocrine therapy. The broad indication criteria of the NATALEE study may increase clinic workloads due to more frequent physician/patient interactions. It also remains unclear how therapy recommendations will influence actual treatment, as increased visits and potential side effects could affect patient compliance and adherence.
背景/目的:本单中心分析评估了在现实环境中接受基于内分泌的口服维持治疗的潜在候选患者数量,重点关注三种治疗药物,即奥拉帕利、阿贝西利和瑞博西尼,用于激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HR+ HER2-)的早期乳腺癌患者。
对过去10年在吕贝克校区石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因大学医院妇产科认证乳腺癌中心接受治疗的所有乳腺癌病例(n = 3230)进行分析。
在总共2038例HR+ HER2-早期乳腺癌(eBC)患者中,685例患者(33.6%)符合使用三种药物(奥拉帕利、阿贝西利和瑞博西尼)中一种或多种药物的条件。在这685例患者中,523例患者(76.4%)有淋巴结阳性疾病,162例(23.6%)有淋巴结阴性疾病。此外,368例患者(占2038例HR+ HER2- eBC患者总数的18.1%)仅符合使用瑞博西尼的条件,包括所有淋巴结阴性患者。共有141例患者(6.9%)符合所有三种药物的标准。相比之下,1353例患者(66.4%)没有联合内分泌治疗的指征。
据我们所知,这是针对联合内分泌治疗的所有三种治疗策略进行的最大规模分析。NATALEE研究广泛的指征标准可能会因医患互动更频繁而增加临床工作量。目前尚不清楚治疗建议将如何影响实际治疗,因为就诊次数增加和潜在的副作用可能会影响患者的依从性和坚持治疗情况。