Müller Carolin, Kiver Verena, Solomayer Erich-Franz, Wagenpfeil Gudrun, Neeb Caroline, Blohmer Jens-Uwe, Abramian Alina Valik, Maass Nicolai, Schütz Florian, Kolberg-Liedtke Cornelia, Ralser Damian Johannes, Rambow Anna-Christina
Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.
Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Breast Care (Basel). 2023 Feb;18(1):31-41. doi: 10.1159/000527917. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy are considered standard-of-care for first-line therapy of patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative, advanced breast cancer (HR+/HER2- ABC). Superiority of combination therapy over endocrine monotherapy has been demonstrated in a multitude of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in phase III and IV. However, RCTs reflect clinical reality only to a limited extent, as narrow inclusion criteria lead to a selected patient collective. Here, we present real-world data (RWD) on CDK4/6i treatment in patients with HR+/HER2- ABC at four certified German university breast cancer centers.
Patients diagnosed with HR+/HER2- ABC who were treated in clinical routine with CDK4/6i between November 2016 and December 2020 at four certified German university breast cancer centers (Saarland University Medical Center, University Medical Center Charité Berlin, University Medical Center Bonn, and University Medical Center Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel) were identified and enrolled in this retrospective study. Clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes were recorded with particular emphasis on CDK4/6i therapy course [progression-free survival (PFS) following treatment initiation, toxicity, dose reduction, therapy discontinuation, prior and subsequent therapy line].
Data from = 448 patients were evaluated. The mean patient age was 63 (±12) years. Of these patients, = 165 (36.8%) were primarily metastasized, and = 283 (63.2%) had secondary metastatic disease. = 319 patients (71.3%) received palbociclib, = 114 patients (25.4%) received ribociclib, and = 15 patients (3.3%) received abemaciclib, respectively. Dose reduction was performed in = 132 cases (29.5%). = 57 patients (12.7%) discontinued the treatment with CDK4/6i due to side effects. = 196 patients (43.8%) experienced disease progression under CDK4/6i treatment. The median PFS was 17 months. Presence of hepatic metastases and prior therapy lines were associated with shorter PFS, whereas estrogen positivity and dose reduction due to toxicity were positively associated with PFS. Presence of bone and lung metastases, progesterone positivity, Ki67 index, grading, and mutation status, adjuvant endocrine resistance, and age did not significantly impact on PFS.
Our RWD analysis on CDK4/6i treatment in Germany supports data from RCTs regarding both treatment efficacy and safety of CDK4/6i for treatment of patients with HR+/HER2- ABC. In comparison to data from the pivotal RCTs, median PFS was lower but within the expected range for RWD, which could result from inclusion of patients with more advanced diseases (i.e., higher therapy lines) to our dataset.
细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂(CDK4/6i)联合内分泌治疗被认为是激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体2阴性的晚期乳腺癌(HR+/HER2-ABC)患者一线治疗的标准方案。在众多III期和IV期随机对照试验(RCT)中已证明联合治疗优于内分泌单药治疗。然而,RCT仅在有限程度上反映临床实际情况,因为狭窄的纳入标准导致入选的患者群体具有局限性。在此,我们展示了德国四家认证大学乳腺癌中心HR+/HER2-ABC患者接受CDK4/6i治疗的真实世界数据(RWD)。
在2016年11月至2020年12月期间,于德国四家认证大学乳腺癌中心(萨尔兰大学医学中心、柏林夏里特大学医学中心、波恩大学医学中心以及石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因大学医学中心基尔校区)接受CDK4/6i临床常规治疗的HR+/HER2-ABC患者被纳入本回顾性研究。记录临床病理特征和临床结局,特别关注CDK4/6i治疗过程[治疗开始后的无进展生存期(PFS)、毒性、剂量减少、治疗中断、先前及后续治疗线]。
评估了448例患者的数据。患者的平均年龄为63(±12)岁。其中,165例(36.8%)为初发转移,283例(63.2%)为继发转移疾病。分别有319例患者(71.3%)接受哌柏西利,114例患者(25.4%)接受瑞博西尼,15例患者(3.3%)接受阿贝西利。132例(29.5%)进行了剂量减少。57例患者(12.7%)因副作用停止CDK4/6i治疗。196例患者(43.8%)在CDK4/6i治疗期间出现疾病进展。中位PFS为17个月。肝转移的存在和先前的治疗线与较短的PFS相关,而雌激素阳性和因毒性导致的剂量减少与PFS呈正相关。骨和肺转移的存在、孕激素阳性、Ki67指数、分级、以及突变状态、辅助内分泌耐药和年龄对PFS无显著影响。
我们对德国CDK4/6i治疗的RWD分析支持了RCT关于CDK4/6i治疗HR+/HER2-ABC患者的疗效和安全性的数据。与关键RCT的数据相比,中位PFS较低,但在RWD的预期范围内,这可能是由于我们的数据集中纳入了更多晚期疾病(即更高治疗线)的患者。